Filtering hgh

Doesn’t look like it’s a problem because Pes is low protein binding

Extracted from https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/...fA8U5BYtQbz-bQ7ojb3Q7_GEM1c61oYsipkGtZvCyLX5D



Agilent Captiva Premium PES syringe filters were evaluated and compared with other PES and PVDF syringe filters for filtration recovery, targeted to protein analysis and chemical cleanliness. For protein analysis, Captiva Premium PES syringe filters provided excellent and consistent filtration recovery for different proteins at low to high concentrations.


Compared to other PES and PVDF syringe filters, Captiva Premium PES syringe filters clearly teatured extremely low protein binding, thus significantly preventing protein analyte loss during filtration. In addition, they were also cleaner than other syringe filters, and therefore, did not cause chemical contamination during filtration. Captiva Premium PES syringe filters are the best option for the filtration of biological samples.”
Yes, I agree that pes are the lowest protein binding filter.
My concern is about it's compatibility with benzyl alcohol that's in bacteriostatic water
 
Interesting find. I have only filtered peptides when did 20 vials at once and I knew the needle will dull.

Looks like it's not compatible


Every AI search I do tells me its not compatible or caution advised.

But since bac water is .9% BA, maybe its fine?

If I do start filtering my peptides I will probably use hydrophilic pvdf filters that have 10% or less protein binding and are BA compatible , compared to pes that bind up to 5% but are not BA compatible.
 
Every AI search I do tells me its not compatible or caution advised.

But since bac water is .9% BA, maybe its fine?

If I do start filtering my peptides I will probably use hydrophilic pvdf filters that have 10% or less protein binding and are BA compatible , compared to pes that bind up to 5% but are not BA compatible.
Good find. But searching it up, it seems to be more an issue for degradation of the filter itself, so using it one time should be fine? Ive just seen any reconstitution with filtering video for peptides advise pes
 
  • Like
Reactions: chd
Good find. But searching it up, it seems to be more an issue for degradation of the filter itself, so using it one time should be fine? Ive just seen any reconstitution with filtering video for peptides advise pes
Could be just degradation over time or with higher percentage of BA, I have no idea.

Let say 1% BA isn't compatible with pes filters, it's always possible to just add it back in after filtering the peptides.

Reconstitute a few vials with WFI, let's say 7-10 day supply. Filter into a sterile vial, then add 1% pre-filtered BA back in
 
Every AI search I do tells me its not compatible or caution advised.

But since bac water is .9% BA, maybe its fine?

If I do start filtering my peptides I will probably use hydrophilic pvdf filters that have 10% or less protein binding and are BA compatible , compared to pes that bind up to 5% but are not BA compatible.
You're completely right.

It may be fine
 
@Ghoul


I entirely agree with you in terms of not using unfiltered peptides.

I was just wondering aloud whether there was any evidence of reduced efficacy (due to neutralizing antibodies) or long-term baseline IGF-1 reduction in those who have used unfiltered HGH, I suppose.

It doesn’t seem we have an epidemic of users having to take huge doses. Although I definitely have seen that with GLP-1s.
Would be a pleasure to talk with you in private messages. Same things on my mind
 
Back
Top