crispybacon!
Member
It was explained earlier in the thread. The stopper is never removed, so sterility is maintained.But without a flow hood doesn't this open up to contamination? I'm probably misunderstanding what's actually happening.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was explained earlier in the thread. The stopper is never removed, so sterility is maintained.But without a flow hood doesn't this open up to contamination? I'm probably misunderstanding what's actually happening.
Ok thanks I thought so but that post had me confused.It was explained earlier in the thread. The stopper is never removed, so sterility is maintained.
And he bought an expensive decrimper to be able to do this, which I appreciate.It was explained earlier in the thread. The stopper is never removed, so sterility is maintained.
This is my guess. I looked into it, and I don't think it yields any greater sterility or longevity of the product by doing this. Appears to be purely cosmetic. But I'm no expert, that's why I asked.I imagine it’s two things… 1, to add a cap, and 2, filling from the side prevents the piercing from being exposed.
Yes that's the reasonAnd he bought an expensive decrimper to be able to do this, which I appreciate.
This is my guess. I looked into it, and I don't think it yields any greater sterility or longevity of the product by doing this. Appears to be purely cosmetic. But I'm no expert, that's why I asked.
@sp5der
A 3 dollar bottle opener works... Lol... It won't remove the rubber stopperAnd he bought an expensive decrimper to be able to do this, which I appreciate.
Takes like 2 seconds too.
Actually take longer to remove the rubber than the cap.
View attachment 365830

