HGH or TB500 for the rest of your life

[Swedishsteel]

Im trying to figure out how many of the peptides i can remove and wich ones im going to keep in and continue to spend money on

Have anyone ever used a dose like 2mg every other day of tb 500 and ran it for over 6-12 months, and how were the results vs a 2 month cycle? I did this almost 15 years ago but cant remember the results really. plus now i have alot more injuries

The benefit of this peptide is so emence that now that we got acess to a better price i feel that would be extremely more effective vs a low dose GH

Im not talking about running 5-10iu gh per day with insulin for mass but a replacement dose for injuries n recovery vs TB.

As so many been using gh for the last 20-30 years at min replacement dose and the results seem "fine" but most are in pain, so how well do gh really
regenerate

What could possibly the effect be later down the line of continue the use of tb500 for a decades straight, possibly an entire different body vs someone else your age at 40-50-60 n up

 

[setters]

There is literally zero human data behind TB, and substantial data behind the role of GH in collagen synthesis and tissue repair. So that's your answer although this is a dumb theoretic question to begin with, since you don't have to pick between them.

 

[Swedishsteel]

There is literally zero human data behind TB, and substantial data behind the role of GH in collagen synthesis and tissue repair. So that's your answer although this is a dumb theoretic question to begin with, since you don't have to pick between them.

The pathways this peptide work is well stablished, you dont need human data for it but it would be better ofc. And we have 10 000s of people getting insaine benefits and miracolous regeneration, wich the animal studies show. wich is why we can draw the conclusion that they are correct

vs take something like kisspeptin. Sounds like a miracle in the studies and do close to nothing in real life (or we dose to low and it needs 500-1000mcg not 100mcg, wich some guys claim)

 

[setters]

The pathways this peptide work is well stablished, you dont need human data for it but it would be better ofc. And we have 10 000s of people getting insaine benefits and miracolous regeneration, wich the animal studies show. wich is why we can draw the conclusion that they are correct

vs take something like kisspeptin. Sounds like a miracle in the studies and do close to nothing in real life (or we dose to low and it needs 500-1000mcg not 100mcg, wich some guys claim)

lol ok yeah because there aren’t dozens of examples of things that work theoretically mechanistically, in vitro or in animals that don’t translate to humans.