Napsgear.net review

yes naps definitely made it right. i just cant understand why the dbols arent doing anything. oh well it doesnt really matter because naps sent me stuff, so im still happy for the most part. just unnecessarily spent a lot of money on food. btw biggerben. i most definitley want u to do a review on that gp superdrol. i ran the real superdrol a while back and gained 34 pounds in like 5 weeks. lost 11 tho in the first couple weeks coming off. but i was even newer than i am now and i wanted to cut immediately like a dumbass
 
yes naps definitely made it right. i just cant understand why the dbols arent doing anything. oh well it doesnt really matter because naps sent me stuff, so im still happy for the most part. just unnecessarily spent a lot of money on food. btw biggerben. i most definitley want u to do a review on that gp superdrol. i ran the real superdrol a while back and gained 34 pounds in like 5 weeks. lost 11 tho in the first couple weeks coming off. but i was even newer than i am now and i wanted to cut immediately like a dumbass

Food is an unavoidable expensive.
 
That being said when problems like hercs surface! Do you think its more of there beginning powder being inferior or a case of underdosing/cutting product?

I do not believe any lab with the long term plans is going to underdose the product on purpose. Tough competition and the labs trend to overdose their products these days. The main issue is the chinese raw suppliers and their unstable quality. This is why it's crucial to have a verified and reliable raw supplier. From my experience, some raws I've been testing ranged from 40 to 98%. It takes time to find a good and reliable supplier and even then there is no guarantee the supplier won't screw you one day.
 
Why on earth would we manufacture an underdosed product? A vial of test E costs us $3. We sell it at $43. What is the point if saving a dollar with such profit margins? I don't get it! Geneza OVERDOSES! the products by 10% min, each batch. The lab tests you can see on our website are real and were made by a Swiss laboratory. I just don't get it when some people suspect the gear is underdosed. One should be really stupid to underdose a $3 product while selling it at $43 and higher.
Anyone wishing to do the blood tests and post it on the board is welcome to PM me!
Damn, 50 tabs Oxandrolone with the quality raws from one of the most expensive supplier cost us $4. We sell it at $60. Tell me one single reason we would underdose the four dollar product and not overdose it actually!

I am going to support it. The most expensive gear is primo and you cannot brew it cheaper then $25/100mg/10ml vial. So if your source sells primo for $40 you should walk away. Product like deca, EQ, test, test blend is $2-$3 maximum. Tabs are even cheaper. Everyone knows that you can make fortune on steroids. It's more profitable then street drugs.
 
Anyone wishing to do the blood tests and post it on the board is welcome to PM me!

Here is the blood work example to support my words. Customer is on a TRT dose - 0.5ml of GP Test Cyp 250. Test levels are 1185. Not bad for 125mg/week dose.

Code:
http://www.eroids.com/pics/gp-test-cyp250-lab-results
 
From my experience, some raws I've been testing ranged from 40 to 98%.

Naps, for us neophytes, could you give some insight into what the remainder (2-60%) of the raws are, then? Like, what is most commonly used to cut raws and are the fillers usually innocuous or harmful? Thanks.
 
Naps, for us neophytes, could you give some insight into what the remainder (2-60%) of the raws are, then? Like, what is most commonly used to cut raws and are the fillers usually innocuous or harmful? Thanks.

I’m not a chemist but I’m sure good portions of the remainder are hormones derived from the main hormone synthesis. It’s like brewing for example 10 liters of wine. You fucked up the technology you still get 10 liters of something but you can’t call it wine anymore. This is why you may see different peaks on the HPLC graph when testing a certain hormone.
 
Back
Top