BB I sent U a PM yesterday on another, yet related, topic did U receive it mate?
Best
Jimmy
Best
Jimmy
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Why so hard to find legit GH?
- Thread starter willis0522
- Start date
no worries jimbo- ben was able to reply based on my substandard, haphazard and ridiculous presentation of a question and his handle doesn't even allude to a possible phd. sorry to bother you.
jim,
i'm also going to put out there what is obvious to you that he didn't say and I dont know enough to ask. most of what I read about hgh is pros and cons type of stuff. testing parameters and units of measure that you asked about aee not the substance of the readings I happened accross. thats why I asked. I always get pissed when someone points out my ignorance, so my rancor was more a result of my own stupidity and resulting embarrasment and not from anything you said.
i'm also going to put out there what is obvious to you that he didn't say and I dont know enough to ask. most of what I read about hgh is pros and cons type of stuff. testing parameters and units of measure that you asked about aee not the substance of the readings I happened accross. thats why I asked. I always get pissed when someone points out my ignorance, so my rancor was more a result of my own stupidity and resulting embarrasment and not from anything you said.
I also type on a phone- I am not illiterate as my typing above would imply. I am also unable to edit.
No problem BUT, I'm still curious having a PhD, MD, MPH, MS and a three time winner of Mr O what the "40"
is supposed to represent
?
Is that 40IU/vial, 40IU/Kit, 40 mg/CC etc.
I mean really this question is about as relevant as they come "what are the units" being used by your source?
Otherwise you could be comparing Apples (generic GH given as IU/ml) to Oranges (Pharm Grade GH given as MG/ml)
The difference could have a significant impact on your gains.
However as BB mentioned generics not only have more side effects than Ph Grade but generic potency and efficacy pales in comparison to PG,
is supposed to represent
? Is that 40IU/vial, 40IU/Kit, 40 mg/CC etc.
I mean really this question is about as relevant as they come "what are the units" being used by your source?
Otherwise you could be comparing Apples (generic GH given as IU/ml) to Oranges (Pharm Grade GH given as MG/ml)
The difference could have a significant impact on your gains.
However as BB mentioned generics not only have more side effects than Ph Grade but generic potency and efficacy pales in comparison to PG,
pittbox
New Member
I've been laughing at this thread all night.
kits are 100iu hyges. he said the ones he "tested" ranged from fake to 20's and these tested at 40. from the way it was talked about I assumed he tested himself, and I thought I had heard other people talk about testing themselves with similar number ranges. maybe im an idiot running on misinformation.
No problem BUT, I'm still curious having a PhD, MD, MPH, MS and a three time winner of Mr O what the "40"
is supposed to represent
I'm curious if in that list of achievements you can also include a blue Brazilian black belt in Japanese ju jitsu; training as a research scientist with a Phd in statistics and getting tenured at an Ivy League school with full professorship in less than 6 months; and finally, did you win a Pulitzer Prize for writing a New York Times bestselling self-help book on the art of seducing women, especially asian women?
I ask because unless or until you surpass that list of accomplishments, Meso's reigning "greatest man in the world" will retain his position. IOW's, you have your work cut out for you.[
)][)][)][)]
Last edited:
Ok you "Brute" really the answer to whether a change will be noticable upon cycling from generic to Pharm grade is a big UNKNOWN. Why? Because we don't even know the dosage of that generic fella. However BB is on Spot the results should only improve once the Ph grade is started.
CBS I am honored and awestruck for you to even consider placing me alongside that Man of Meso Miracle, the great PERICLES! :notworthy:
But of course my achievements pale in comparison to Meso's MOM (Mentor Of Men)
Again I appreciate the kind words mate, NOT, HELL NO, HOW DARE YOU, AS OF THIS MOMENT OUR MESO FRIENDSHIP IS TERMINATED,
[)]
[)][)]
[)][)][)]
But of course my achievements pale in comparison to Meso's MOM (Mentor Of Men)
Again I appreciate the kind words mate, NOT, HELL NO, HOW DARE YOU, AS OF THIS MOMENT OUR MESO FRIENDSHIP IS TERMINATED,
[
)][
)][)][
)][)][)]
WMSuperSport
New Member
CBS, pardon my ignorance,
Whats IOWs?
Internet Online Warriors? Theres alot of those here... which 1?
Whats IOWs?
Internet Online Warriors? Theres alot of those here... which 1?
johnnyBALLZ
New Member
No problem BUT, I'm still curious having a PhD, MD, MPH, MS and a three time winner of Mr O what the "40"
is supposed to represent
Is that 40IU/vial, 40IU/Kit, 40 mg/CC etc.
I mean really this question is about as relevant as they come "what are the units" being used by your source?
I believe my man brutus is referring to the results on a GH serum test coming back in the "40's"..
From my understanding 20's are good and over 40 is excellent... However, as pointed out by the good Doc in an earlier thread, IGF testing may be more accurate.
In other words
WMSuperSport
New Member
I was way off 
Hey seems reasonable IMO because the high end peak is around 10ng/ml.
No doubt the "level" achieved would also correlate with the dosage of GH pinned.
That being said (as WSS mentioned) I've never been a big fan spot GH levels, (and preferred IGF testing), because even a three fold difference from baseline may be considered a normal variation.
There are several other causations of a falsely elevated GH level and for that reason, serial IGF testing over a 5-7 day period using a fixed dosage of roughly
5 IU/day, is a better means of analyzing the serological effects of GH based on existing evidence. (After all a change in IGF levels was the PRIMARY variable utilized to establish and standardize the GROWTH HORMONE INTERNATIONAL UNIT !!!)
jim
No doubt the "level" achieved would also correlate with the dosage of GH pinned.
That being said (as WSS mentioned) I've never been a big fan spot GH levels, (and preferred IGF testing), because even a three fold difference from baseline may be considered a normal variation.
There are several other causations of a falsely elevated GH level and for that reason, serial IGF testing over a 5-7 day period using a fixed dosage of roughly
5 IU/day, is a better means of analyzing the serological effects of GH based on existing evidence. (After all a change in IGF levels was the PRIMARY variable utilized to establish and standardize the GROWTH HORMONE INTERNATIONAL UNIT !!!)
jim
thanks dr! any good links for educating myself on hgh so I dont sound like a tool forever?
