R
readalot
Guest
My bad. I thought this was sincere discussion rather than fun game of "stump the chump". Anyway, hope the references are useful to someone.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Steroid Bust Poland September 2025
- Thread starter Mediawelt
- Start date
R
readalot
Guest
Photon
Member
I've tried searching but those search terms aren't the best lol. Let me try again..
R
readalot
Guest
I will try to find it.
Photon
Member
Are you refering to this?
Good summary here.
Bacteria - Size, Shape and Arrangement
In studying bacteria found in various environments in nature, they widely vary in size, shape, and arrangement. Learn more here.
www.microscopemaster.com
0.1 smaller than 0.2. 0.2 should do the job.
R
readalot
Guest
Yeah. There go you. And even those little buggers (mycoplasmas) are tough with 0.1.Are you refering to this?
Good summary here.
Bacteria - Size, Shape and Arrangement
In studying bacteria found in various environments in nature, they widely vary in size, shape, and arrangement. Learn more here.
0.1 smaller than 0.2. 0.2 should do the job.
Am I not supposed to question his assertion that there is no endotoxin in a vial when it arrives to the user, especially when I have testing that shows otherwise? And based on that, I ask again, what procedure is usable by laypeople, and not a procedure in a research paper, to get rid of the endotoxin? And how are you being sincere giving me procedures I cannot use?
R
readalot
Guest
Question away. I am sure there is plenty of endotoxin count floating around in UG peptides. I never scratched the surface on that one based on personal interest/bias.
I don't know of one.
I was sincerely providing info. Made no claim otherwise than just sharing techniques that can be employed in industry.
I just thought you lovebirds comment was sort of chippy. But that is your perogative.
Anyway, wish you the best and always appreciate your brain.
Edit: didn't understand you were trying to identify a method to remove endotoxins from product in your possession. What did report state?
Last edited by a moderator:
I wouldn’t use 0.1 with hgh. But it works fine with other peptides.
Photon
Member
Due to shear stress?
Even 0.2 pes from cobetter doesn’t work with hgh without causing aggregates. (Unless I use the polysorbate 20 bac water to reconstitute, which protects against shear and hydrophobic interactions).
Obviously I’m not saying these aggregates are proven to be bad for you or anything but I prefer to get it right if I’m going to do it you know? Maybe they can affect the immune system or something and I’d prefer to avoid it.
I think there’s a combination of shear stress and hydrophobic-ness that causes it. Pes is generally hydrophilic but if the protein is sensitive then even the slight hydrophobicness can cause denaturing.
I was considering trying cobetter’s PVDF as they claim is even more hydrophilic and lower protein binding than their PES. Although I am not sure since I really need to stop buying stuff lol.
Likewise.
It's not my product, but it affirms my interest in endotoxin removal since filtering can only give me sterility. I am pro-filtering since I filter all of my peptides (my oils don't need to be filtered), but ghoul could never see that because once he gets a whiff of someone questioning him all he sees is an attack that must be dealt with.
The test in question actually exceeded the lab's detection limit of 500EU so it is somewhere, possibly much, north of that.
R
readalot
Guest
Photon
Member
The only peps i actually filter are carnitine and glutathione (just too lazy lol).
I need new filters for them as I'm running out and was considering 0.1 PVDFs because the price difference between that and 0.22 is pretty insignificant and also because i have visible crap in my SSA Mtren oil that I cant get out with a .22um PTFE...which made me wonder if .22 is sufficient..
Last edited:
R
readalot
Guest
Photon
Member
Anyone ever told you that you got some serious vision?
Its the boogieman in ma oils!
Anyone seen something like this?
SSA MTREN5, Jano tested with 95% overdose.
It dissolves clear when i shake the vial but this cloudy stuff forms after 48 hours or so. Already filtered twice with a .22 PTFE at room temp.
I'm sourcing for .1 PTFE now.
It doesn't look like crashing to me..
SSA MTREN5, Jano tested with 95% overdose.
It dissolves clear when i shake the vial but this cloudy stuff forms after 48 hours or so. Already filtered twice with a .22 PTFE at room temp.
I'm sourcing for .1 PTFE now.
It doesn't look like crashing to me..
Ghoul
Member
The bacteria below .22um pore size aren’t gram negative (all are larger than .3um) and aren’t pathogenic to humans, which is why that size is the standard used for sterilization by pharma. .1um will remove those smaller bacteria along with some large virii, so there’s a slight benefit, but at the cost of slower filtration and slightly (<1%) more peptide loss.
R
readalot
Guest
You put it through 0.2 um PTFE. Heat or shaking gets rid of it?Its the boogieman in ma oils!
Anyone seen something like this?
SSA MTREN5, Jano tested with 95% overdose.
It dissolves clear when i shake the vial but this cloudy stuff forms after 48 hours or so. Already filtered twice with a .22 PTFE at room temp.
I'm sourcing for .1 PTFE now.
It doesn't look like crashing to me..
Appears your oil is supersaturated and over time you get suspension with small particle size?
0.1 um won't touch it.
Dilute it.
Last edited by a moderator:
Photon
Member
It's 9.5mg/ml only tho.
Shouldn't it be crashing instead of turning into a suspension?
Ghoul
Member
No failed endotoxin tests of peptide vials, unlike the high rate of bacteria contaminated vials.
But let’s say there is endotoxin. What’s your point?
Similar threads
