MESO-Rx Sponsor Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

Happy New Year everyone! I hope this new year starts in a positive direction in all of our lives and everyone enjoys a good 2026.

Reminder, Basicstero only takes orders through the official site (link in the code box below). Be careful, there are a lot of scammers, counterfeits, and fake sites etc. Order and communicate with the source through the official site only.

Basicstero.ws is the Official Direct from Pharmacom Labs Store.
When ordering from the Basicstero store, customers can be confident they will receive genuine Pharmacom Labs products.
Regardless of warehouse choice, Basicstero customers are always guaranteed authentic Pharmacom Labs products!
Basicstero is Pharmacom Labs, NOT a reseller.
Code:
https://basicstero.ws
Important: This source does not take orders via email.
If anyone tries to get you to place a new order via email or a site/link other than the basicstero.ws official store, it may be a scam.
BEWARE OF SCAMMERS! ALL ORDERS SHOULD ONLY BE PLACED AND PROCESSED THROUGH THE CHECKOUT PROCESS IN THE OFFICIAL STORE!
 
Tirzepatide from Pharmacom Labs is Now Available at Basicstero
IFL6ORX.jpg


JAROS is the new tirzepatide product from Pharmacom Lab and can be found in the Basicstero store at the link in the code bow below.
Code:
https://basicstero.ws/fat-loss/jaros

Tirzepatide Information
Tirzepatide is a prescription injectable medication used for the treatment of chronic weight management in adults with obesity or who are overweight with a weight-related condition, Type 2 diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). It is also known under the brand names Zepbound (for weight loss and sleep apnea) and Mounjaro (for Type 2 diabetes).

How It Works
Tirzepatide is a first-in-class dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist.
It works by mimicking the natural gut hormones GIP and GLP-1 to:

• Stimulate the pancreas to release more insulin when blood sugar levels are high.

• Reduce the amount of sugar the liver produces and releases into the bloodstream.

• Slow down the emptying of the stomach, which helps a person feel fuller for longer and reduces appetite

• Target areas in the brain that regulate appetite and food cravings, which helps lower overall food intake and leads to weight loss.

Always consult with a healthcare professional before starting treatment with tirzepatide to ensure it is appropriate for your health condition and to discuss any potential risks or interactions with other medications you may be taking.

 
The volunteering package is at Jano (received confirmation yesterday morning (31-12). Just a few days of waiting left!

Please do remember I’ve send in an unopened/untouched vial with the box and booklet. Just like it was shipped to me :)
 
When is OXANDROLONOS 10 and OXANDROLONOS 25 back in stock for international warehouse ?
I don't think it will be in stock anytime soon.

There are no more high-quality raw materials being produced. So, everyone can only work with the raw materials that are left on hand from before the chemical plants stopped making AAS raw materials. As a result, the availability of AAS will continue to be rarer and prices of existing products may increase because the basic economic principle of supply and demand. In the case of these products, there are no more new supply production, but there is very high demand.
Be careful with anyone that makes other claims. Low prices or easy availability are very suspicious given the raw material situation.

Please watch this interview with Janoshik (the founder of the very popular analytic lab) to better understand some of the consequences of this situation:
View: https://youtu.be/Vf__M0KLNzQ?si=IXPRgRSTeb1ue8xz&t=1410

Summary at: https://thinksteroids.com/community...ro-com-store.134363986/page-1668#post-3613388

This situation means that AAS sources cannot make new batches when their current stock of raw materials runs out. The shortage is at the base of the supply-chain at the chemical plant level; therefore, if any AAS producers claims to have access to high-quality raw materials to make new batches of these products, proceed with caution because they may be being deceitful or its likely their own ignorance may have been exploited (they could have been scammed by a raw material seller) by someone further up the supply chain.
 
I don't think it will be in stock anytime soon.

There are no more high-quality raw materials being produced. So, everyone can only work with the raw materials that are left on hand from before the chemical plants stopped making AAS raw materials. As a result, the availability of AAS will continue to be rarer and prices of existing products may increase because the basic economic principle of supply and demand. In the case of these products, there are no more new supply production, but there is very high demand.
Be careful with anyone that makes other claims. Low prices or easy availability are very suspicious given the raw material situation.

Please watch this interview with Janoshik (the founder of the very popular analytic lab) to better understand some of the consequences of this situation:
View: https://youtu.be/Vf__M0KLNzQ?si=IXPRgRSTeb1ue8xz&t=1410

Summary at: https://thinksteroids.com/community...ro-com-store.134363986/page-1668#post-3613388

This situation means that AAS sources cannot make new batches when their current stock of raw materials runs out. The shortage is at the base of the supply-chain at the chemical plant level; therefore, if any AAS producers claims to have access to high-quality raw materials to make new batches of these products, proceed with caution because they may be being deceitful or its likely their own ignorance may have been exploited (they could have been scammed by a raw material seller) by someone further up the supply chain.

But they are recently available stealth, is this the same powder?
 
I don't think it will be in stock anytime soon.

There are no more high-quality raw materials being produced. So, everyone can only work with the raw materials that are left on hand from before the chemical plants stopped making AAS raw materials. As a result, the availability of AAS will continue to be rarer and prices of existing products may increase because the basic economic principle of supply and demand. In the case of these products, there are no more new supply production, but there is very high demand.
Be careful with anyone that makes other claims. Low prices or easy availability are very suspicious given the raw material situation.

Please watch this interview with Janoshik (the founder of the very popular analytic lab) to better understand some of the consequences of this situation:
View: https://youtu.be/Vf__M0KLNzQ?si=IXPRgRSTeb1ue8xz&t=1410

Summary at: https://thinksteroids.com/community...ro-com-store.134363986/page-1668#post-3613388

This situation means that AAS sources cannot make new batches when their current stock of raw materials runs out. The shortage is at the base of the supply-chain at the chemical plant level; therefore, if any AAS producers claims to have access to high-quality raw materials to make new batches of these products, proceed with caution because they may be being deceitful or its likely their own ignorance may have been exploited (they could have been scammed by a raw material seller) by someone further up the supply chain.

Damn I thought it was just masteron and primo mainly. I didn’t think that Anavar was affected. So pretty much all AAS is an issue
 
Damn I thought it was just masteron and primo mainly. I didn’t think that Anavar was affected. So pretty much all AAS is an issue
I think the raw material shortage situation will most AAS.
What that interview and check out other threads/source that are already out-of-stock of testosterone etc.

But they are recently available stealth, is this the same powder?
Please see the my comment to a similar question. It is my opinion; I can;t be sure about the decision of exactly how to use remaining resource because I do not have any authority over these choices.
...I think Basicstero is trying to gain access to more shipping options. Also, there is a raw material shortage, so I think it is important that remaining raws are utilized as efficiently as possible, the lowest additional costs for packaging etc., and the products have the highest chance of successfully reaching the customers.

As for Primo itself, I don't know if there is any material left, or if there are some reserves, will new bachtes be produced anytime soon.
I just don't know.

If I were a source and had some good raw materials left in reserve, I would save them because the products should be worth more in the future as things become increasingly rare.
If suddenly, there are new raws, it would be ok because then I could simply resume business as usual. So, its a win-win to wait and hold rare chemicals. They either become worth more or it doesn't matter because normal business can resume.
But such choices are up to each business -- I don;t have any authority or influence in that regard.

Basicstero fulfilled their promise!

I received the 320$ shopping credit as promised :)
Thanks again for sending a sample and sharing your Jano results.
Hopefully others will see this and be willing to send a sample for the testing project now that they can be confident that Basicstero keep their promises.
 
Thanks for this friend. Curious now as to what other variables could have caused the other guys results to be skewed from the same batch.
I sent you a PM with some of my thoughts.
I would post my ideas here but many member of this community are too dramatic, easily triggered, ignorant, and aggressive, which makes interaction unproductive and toxic.
Time here should be a positive thing, working together with people that share the same interests so we help each other reach our goals, or there are much better things we can do with our time.
Its not worth it to me to argue all day with illogical people that have dogmatic prejudices, or push some agenda, and not genuinely interested in figuring things our or exploring ideas.
 
I am sorry for falling into the trap and thought that the fake brand .ltd was the same as .com, my apologies. I have tried removing the post but I can’t. Will message a mod and ask it to be deleted. @RThoads
I understand. Its no big deal bro. I'm sure you meant well and were trying to be helpful. We all learn more of these details as we go -- that's what this community is all about.
There are a lot of fake results online. Maybe one day, if I have the time, I can try to collect some of them and make an informative post about it with examples. Telegram groups keep posting results of counterfeits. Sometimes I wonder if they have an agenda, such as work for a competitor (not uncommon), and are bashing some sources to try to influence customers.
Fake counterfeits. Good eye and catch @Nick_Vaz, you're correct.

I was done visiting this thread but someone mentioned to me that people are showing results for fake products now, so I wanted to comment about it to help everyone be more aware.

Zoom in really close on the product photo, look at the product label -- it is from a known fake scam site with the pharmacomlabs.ltd address printed on the product, not the genuine pharmacomlabs.com site.

Unfortunately, it may not always be so easy to identify fakes, but this counterfeit brand put their fake website address so people will check the fake verification code on their fake website.
A lot of fakes may not be this easy to catch, so be careful.
Some of the results you find and share are from counterfeits, not genuine products.

Please see the post linked below for some examples of the known fakes and scammers.


Here are some of the authenticity protections that can help



And, you can check if a source is an official authorized seller or not at the link in the code box below.
Code:
https://pharmacomlabs.com/dealers

Be careful because some of the fakes and scams may be dangerous (I've heard of some having toxic chemicals and/or dangerous drugs in the counterfeits).
I hope this information helps everyone be safe.
 
I'm currently using this same batch test E, don't know feels like any other test I took before. I only do TRT doses tho.
Underdosing test E in a blend and not the mast e which is basically unubtanium and 5 tines the price is really odd
My test is arriving in a few weeks. I placed the order back in dec I hope mine is not the same batch number btw I buy from basicstero which is a valid source. @RThoads Would the offer be open for PHARMASUST 300 as well ? I have an idea it wont be but hey might as well try anyways right ')
that's rough news about Pharmacom. Used to be the go-to, now it's just another overpriced gamble. Guess I'll be hunting for a new reliable source too. Anyone got any leads on brands that are actually dosed correctly these days?
Ty for testing!! What a bummer :( ..i’ve got some of the Test E… had my eye on that Mast Mix too! Shoot :/
Guys, please see the posts quoted below.
Another customer sent in a sample from the same batch.
Also, there is still an outstanding offer for up to two more customers to send in samples from that same batch (see one of the posts quoted below for more details). The results below are customer samples.

And, think logically, what seems more reasonable...
Maybe the anomalous results were not accurate for some reason?
Or, are all the many years of good results (including from other customers and testing groups etc.) and these most recent customers' results all wrong, so only the one set of outlier results are correct?
Just ask yourself, why some of you think all the other results, including customers' results, new and old, do not count, but magically only the anomalous results count? Do you have a cognitive bias? Does your position make logical sense?


Here is the anonymous customer's analytic result recently found on Reddit for the Drostanolone (Masteron) MIX-M.
5X52zST.jpg
and the source's testing on what is most likely the same batch of TEST-E300 (link in the code box below).
Code:
https://basicstero.ws/uploads/pdf/pdf-1749152142-u8b1cgy6be_120_200_0.png

Basicstero's offer to people that have the same batch to get more testing done.
Basicstero is looking for 3 volunteers to get analytic testing performed on the specific TEST-E300 and MIX-M batches listed below.

The MESO community and Basicstero want to see additional analytic results for the exact same batch that is in question so we can get more data and Pharmacom Labs may make improvements, if an issue that can be improved upon is identified.

If you have any brand-new unopened samples of the following products, please consider volunteering for this project. Volunteers may be selected or declined at Basicstero’s discretion.

PHARMA TEST-E300: batch #PHT300014EV

PHARMA MIX-M: batch #PHDR00007MV

Please reply here in the Basicstero thread if you meet the requirements and are interested in volunteering.

Basicstero is primarily interested in the TEST-E300 result because this is one of the most popular and common products and there are still some other moderate to long ester replacements available to customers at this time.
The MIX-M result is also of some interest but it is understood that this is a much less common product and there are no analogous replacements available to customers because of the raws shortage – there are no new batches currently planned as a result of the raw material shortage.
The NPP result is not of interest because the result in question is already extremely close to being a pass in the +/- 10% acceptable tolerance range and these is some variance in testing results.

Requirements: each volunteer must have a brand-new unopened sample from the exact same batch (listed above) that BigJP had tested and be able to provide the valid Basicstero order number for the purchase of each sample.
Please provide photographs of the sample to clearly show the batch number.
The sample must be sent to, and received by, the analytic service in brand-new and unopened condition (the top cap must still be sealed on the vial as it comes from the store), to help eliminate as many variables as possible.

The volunteers must each agree to send the sample of the specific batch in question to Jano* and pay for their own testing expenses.
The volunteers must also agree to provide Basicstero and Pharmacom Labs access to the results and grant Basicstero and Pharmacom Labs the permission to share the results anywhere at any time (the client’s name and any other personal identifying information will be redacted on the analytic report before it is shared).

Compensation: Basicstero agrees to the following compensation package for each volunteer; the value of the compensation will be issued as Basicstero store credit, added to the volunteer’s Basicstero account balance (which may be used in the Basicstero store at any time), after the analytic results are completed and the final reports are made available to Basicstero.

1) $120 USD credit for “Common AAS Screening Quantitative” (Janoshik Analytical).

2) $100 USD credit for the donated TEST-E300 sample (this is more than anyone paid for a single TEST-E300 product from Basicstero, so it clearly covers the cost of an analogous replacement from any warehouse).

Or, If the donated sample cost the customer more than $100 USD, then the exact cost of the sample will be credited instead (so the customer will get the greater amount), which can be verified by the order number (to show from which warehouse the sample was purchased and the cost can be verified).

In the rare event an individual volunteer has samples of both products in question (TEST-E300 and MIX-M), then the sum of the exact costs of the samples will be credited, because the cost of both products combined may be greater than the $100 reward.

3) $100 USD credit additional bonus to thank the volunteer for his or her time and effort in helping us all with this project, and to offset shipping expenses.

Therefore, the compensation credited to each volunteer’s account will be no less than $320 USD total.

*NOTE: Jano appears to be the most popular analytic service available at this time; nonetheless, if a volunteer strongly prefers to use a different analytic service, we can discuss it and present the idea to Basicstero for consideration; approval for a different analytic service must be obtained from Basicstero before moving forward with the project. However, the analytic service used must be well-known and reputable and the cost must be very similar to Jano’s service (not something such as double the cost).

IMPORTANT: please do not take it upon yourself to send a sample and expect Basicstero to compensate you; Basicstero is not required to compensate you unless it has been agreed upon and it is publicly stated here in the thread that you have been selected.
You must volunteer, have a sample that meets the requirements (you may be asked to provide the product photo to show you do have a brand-new unopened sample from the correct batch to ensure no one’s time or resources are wasted), and get approval to consider it an agreement.

Thank you all for your consideration.





@BALLISTIC and @Raww
Thanks again for the good suggestion.

By the way, even if the anomalous results were accurate, how bad did they hurt you? Look at the math in the quote below -- was the overly dramatic reaction, like something horrible happend, necessary?
+/-10% of label claim is widely considered a good result; the TEST-E result that trigger so many people was 86% of label claim and confirms the correct compound; in other words, it wasn't even a bad result (I bet if the raw materials shortage continues, soon many guys will be looking for some good clean testosterone, confirmed by analytic testing, like the product here).
By the way, even if these alleged "bad" results are accurate, everyone should ask themselves how "bad" was the situation really was?
Does anything in your life really change? would your results in the gym really be any different? Was anything dangerous or toxic exposed in these results?
The reaction in the results thread (were the source really cannot defend itself) and damage to the business here was disproportional.

Everyone could have explained and explored the possible reasons for the results, or, even if you don't understand that there may have been an error, you could have explained that the results don't show anything significant or dramatic.
But, instead of being reasonable, the first few guys that reacted pounces on a chance to act very negative and dramatic and accuse the source of being bad. So of course, the sheep will follow because of the cognitive bias that was established and the need to fit in with the crowd.
If the first few guys were calm and explained what I will explain, most people would have reacted much differently.

You can see that a lot of guys only read the first post so no matter what happens after that or what details are discussed, the damage is done -- congrats, your reactions (not BigJP or the results) hurt one of the best AAS sources you will ever find.

This is a strange place where most of the people here use AAS, but then they act like the hate AAS sources.

Maybe one day the haters will get their way and all the AAS sources will go under -- what a victory. We will show those nasty sources, that produce the products we all want, what's up.
Then, all us AAS users can celebrate having no access to AAS.

Ahh, time will tell -- especially with the lack of raw materials -- the future is going to be interesting. I have a front row seat to watch how it all unfolds.

I haven't done it until now, because I really didn't want to waste more time debating random names on a website, but let's crunch the actual numbers to see how tragic this historic situation was that traumatized people like it was Pearl Harbor or Covid.

Keep in mind that +/- 10% has been the widely accepted tolerance for many years including the pass/fail threshold for testing projects such as AnabolicLab.
Therefore a 90% to %110 would have been considered a good result.

Trigger warning: don't look at the math or anything else stated below if you're easily offended and dramatic, you've been warned so get ready to clutch your pearls and act traumatized like something really significant in life just happened...

TEST-E300:
258.28 / 300 = 86%

MIX-M:
163.68 / 200 = 82%
82.86 / 100 = 83%

NPP:
89.13 / 100 = 89%

Some of these were very close to being in the acceptable range to have been considered a "pass." Who knows if we sent a few samples from each batch, what would the averages look like?

But as I have already said, even if the results are true, nothing there shows any dangerous risks -- the results don't even claim that the wrong AAS were used.

That is not the same as having the wrong active agent or dangerous contamination. I respect anyone is free to disagree (no one is forced to shop here) but I will still be using these products even if the results were accurate, and I still consider this one of the best sources of which I'm aware. (on a side note, I really don't have other sources right now, so if you're very confident that you know of a much better option than what I have, anyone is free to shoot me a PM and let me know about it -- I have helped a lot of guys here, so its fair if people help me too, and it never hurts for me to have some other options).

So, I feel like people are just excited to pounce on any opportunity to bash this source, and I don't understand why. It’s as if they are excited and want to see Basicstero have a problem -- as if they want there to be a problem here, but I don't understand why?

To be clear, and I've already said it many times before but people seem to want to misunderstand me to make drama, so I'll say it again...
I'm not blaming @BigJP for any of it -- I thanked him.
He was completely calm and kind to me every time I've ever talked to him. He didn't get all offended or dramatic like some guys here.
If more people here were like him, this would be a much better community.
 
Last edited:
Guys, please see the posts quoted below.
Another customer sent in a sample from the same batch.
Also, there is still an outstanding offer for up to two more customers to send in samples from that same batch (see one of the posts quoted below for more details). The results below are customer samples.

And, think logically, what seems more reasonable...
Maybe the anomalous results were not accurate for some reason?
Or, are all the many years of good results (including from other customers and testing groups etc.) and these most recent customers' results all wrong, so only the one set of outlier results are correct?
Just ask yourself, why some of you think all the other results, including customers' results, new and old, do not count, but magically only the anomalous results count? Do you have a cognitive bias? Does your position make logical sense?




and the source's testing on what is most likely the same batch of TEST-E300 (link in the code box below).
Code:
https://basicstero.ws/uploads/pdf/pdf-1749152142-u8b1cgy6be_120_200_0.png

Basicstero's offer to people that have the same batch to get more testing done.


By the way, even if the anomalous results were accurate, how bad did they hurt you? Look at the math in the quote below -- was the overly dramatic reaction, like something horrible happend, necessary?
+/-10% of label claim is widely considered a good result; the TEST-E result that trigger so many people was 86% of label claim and confirms the correct compound; in other words, it wasn't even a bad result (I bet if the raw materials shortage continues, soon many guys will be looking for some good clean testosterone, confirmed by analytic testing, like the product here).
My statement was bias to nothing is was just stating a observation that makes zero sense . Test e being underdosed while costing 800 a kg and still available versus masteron 5000 a kg and currently impossible to get makes no sense I would tend to question the analysis because I can't see a motive for that.
 
My statement was bias to nothing is was just stating a observation that makes zero sense . Test e being underdosed while costing 800 a kg and still available versus masteron 5000 a kg and currently impossible to get makes no sense I would tend to question the analysis because I can't see a motive for that.
No problem, I understand. I did not mean that you are accusing the source or not. I just included people that I saw comment about it so everyone can see more of the information. I wanted to share the info I have collected but that other section of the forums is not for it. So, I shared the details here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top