Connor 25257
Member
@Primal_Pharma sent you an email about something 
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Use email for this. Don't tie your username to the personal info on your order.@Primal_Pharma can I have assistance with an order I placed?
He got tired of being crapped on.What happened to @readalot?
A few more weeks and your testicles will ascend!Ride it like I do and you’ll be fine. People obsess over 2.8 vs 3.0 like it’s a death sentence. It isn’t.
From my personal field research, the only thing that showed noticeable growth at higher Z-scores wasn’t my jaw, hands, or shoe size. Let’s just say my jeans got tighter for reasons science doesn’t want to discuss.
Bloods fine. Health fine. Ego slightly inflated for unrelated reasons.
View attachment 376576
@Primal_Pharma … this one.
Yeah, This was the batch where the raws produced a Primo 100, but the Primo 200 came out as 180 and was discounted. There was only a vendor GCMS of the Primo 200/180 and not a GCMS of the Primo 100 until now
Claimed to have been brewed in Miglyol 812. I don't see anything that contradicts the claim....and now wish i'd got more.
The Primo 200 GCMS shows BB, whilst the Primo 100 one doesn't, both fit Migoyl i think.
What's your concern about the differences? I think Jano already cleared up that both contained BB and BA, but wasn't reported on the ME100 GSMS. Neither look like chinese oil, but look like Migoyl as promised.
For reference here are the two GCMS
It’s different than all the new ones just posted as well as the 200 that was posted at the release, which might lead one to believe the 100 was selectively not included in vendor GCMS testing. Oh and the mg/ml was spot on and the 200 was considerably off.What's your concern about the differences? I think Jano already cleared up that both contained BB and BA, but wasn't reported on the ME100 GSMS. Neither look like chinese oil, but look like Migoyl as promised.
For reference here are the two GCMS
Not for nothing but how could you look at those and suggest they’re the same?What's your concern about the differences? I think Jano already cleared up that both contained BB and BA, but wasn't reported on the ME100 GSMS. Neither look like chinese oil, but look like Migoyl as promised.
For reference here are the two GCMS
I didn't say they were the same. But i did see two Migoyl based Primo's. One looked like it had more oxidation, which i assumed to be from heat during the brewing process. I am happy to defer to wiser folk though of course. I'm learning with every question too.Not for nothing but how could you look at those and suggest they’re the same?
I didn't say they were the same. But i did see two Migoyl based Primo's. One looked like it had more oxidation, which i assumed to be from heat during the brewing process. I am happy to defer to wiser folk though of course. I'm learning with every question too.
I'm not negging you asking questions. Just wondering what the concern was so there's specific questions rather than "please comment".
They’re all trace, could be the result of the customer handling?I didn't say they were the same. But i did see two Migoyl based Primo's. One looked like it had more oxidation, which i assumed to be from heat during the brewing process. I am happy to defer to wiser folk though of course. I'm learning with every question too.
I'm not negging you asking questions. Just wondering what the concern was so there's specific questions rather than "please comment".
Good questionThey’re all trace, could be the result of the customer handling?
They’re all trace, could be the result of the customer handling?
Wow. I felt cocky with just a single case.Same here lol, I've got about 10,000 or so Easy Touch I stocked up on, and now I find out there's a better and cheaper option. Son of a...
View attachment 376624
Why does the stuff we would expect in the most abundance, typically show up with the largest “area”? Aside from the volatile compound limitations?What we have is not a quantitative gcms.
None of us here can afford it.
The gcms only answers one question "does it exist or not".
Ignore the numbers.
The vial could be full of it.
Or trace.
We don't know.
$$$
Wh
Why does the stuff we would expect in the most abundance, typically show up with the largest “area”? Aside from the volatile compound limitations?
Because we already have quantitative HPLC methods developed. Why develop (lot of time and $) and maintain for GCMS too?Hi. Just curious why your GCMS service is not quantitative?
It's HPLC-DAD gradient methods, some details are here: https://janoshik.com/details/Where can I find the assays/methods used for qualitative and quantitative AAS tests advertised on your website?
ICP MSICP-OES for metals?
Thank you.
I have a habit of stocking up on things lolWow. I felt cocky with just a single case.
You stocking up on thing..... never. I wish you were my best friend at the gym and one day I finally found out who you really are.I have a habit of stocking up on things lol
Between my wife and I, we go through almost 20 a day
