Search results for query: Plausible deniability

Anemia would be the first one

It's all about Plausible Deniability. Anybody CAN mail anything to any address, for any reason. You have no idea where that package came from. However, go looking for a "missing" parcel, much harder to deny it or said contents. Address it with dragon because perhaps something could have broken...

...these packages as reshippable though. If you've been tracking your package from the day its shipped, you've already lost the plausible deniability battle. Tracking your package on USPS with no regards to your OPSPEC is a lost battle, especially if you've been tracking it from an informed...

I said I'd post a little bit about crypto and I'm bored. I took the day off today because it's gonna be really nice out, but it's 5 AM and I'm up. So as I drink my cavfefe I shall be writing this post to help bring further glory to Meso! How to buy Crypto is easy. I'm not gonna talk about that...

I've never ordered anything like this and don't sell anything. I was literally just trying to get enough test to not feel like a depressed fucking lump. Doctors only want to give you enough to be just above woman levels. I did stupidly track the package out of excitement though, so I guess I...

I understand your point and had a similar experience lol. It was fun to say, even though we knew it didn't add any plausible deniability. The fact is, the moment we talk about something and make a statement it connects us to whatever that is. Guess I'm stuck in the past with a few things

It's not private but it gives a layer of plausible deniability. And like I mentioned, if you send directly from Coinbase or whichever big exchange, you risk having your account banned if the address you sent to is later tied to some shady shit. Xmr is certainly a better option but not as widely...

Well, it is you, all 250 pounds of muscle, sitting there in an ill fitting suit looking ridiculous to a jury. I wonder if they will believe you ordered the steroids?

Get a UPS Store post box. Use fake name with your source. Store hands out mail by box number and not name. So now you have package not under your name going to a box instead of your house. Only way to go , tons plausible deniability

...you get a package you will maybe be prosecuted (even here) depends on the size of the package and contents but if you have done things properly they will have no proof it's you that bought that package, plausible deniability simple as that. Just shut the fuck up and ask for a lawyer. End of...

...where they busted people without signing for it. I get the idea that people say “oh if you don’t sign for it then you have plausible deniability” but everyone’s going to sign for any package if they get one. It isn’t really an admission of guilt. There’s plenty of stories of people getting...

...back in case they don't like the quality? Think about it, man. How much easier do you think it would be for the authorities to build a case if you purchase all of your illegal drugs through the mail paying with a credit card? At least using BTC can give you a chance of plausible deniability.

I thought you had to show ID to get a UPS Store mailbox, which puts it in your name? Or are you saying get the UPS Store mailbox in your legal name and then have your raws sent to it under a fake name? You don’t think the UPS employee would realize that’s not your name and withhold the delivery?

I thought it would be self evident that I was cracking a joke and not actually suggesting that the cartels had just not yet figured out the big secret of not signing for deliveries through the US mail . . .

Plausible deniability. If you sign for a package it’s hard to say “I didn't know what was in there” or “it’s not mine”.

Fake name means no objection to opening the package, because you have no interests under the Fourth Amendment to assert, cause its not you, right? So you lose one layer of protection. The employee at the UPS store is not a government employee like the USPS is. So if the officer says, "Hey, I...

They have to prove you received it either way, so the credit card aspect isn't really that big of a deal. They are going to get you when you take possession of it, whether you ordered it by credit card, or not. And if you are a dealer, they will get your bank records to see how often you made...

...word for it, ultimately. Sure, if the cops really want you, they can figure out some of a sources customers but having some plausible deniability is always the best bet. Nonetheless, it's far easier to trace a sale via cc than one made using crypto. If you do things right, it should be...

Do you access the UPS box on your own without being recorded. If you're recorded walking out with the pack you now have evidence of you receiving pack. If you get in your vehicle you are now fully in possession of something illegal. Of course you lock it up in the trunk in a safe box, but if...

I haven't yet, but I will be soon. Do you think if law enforcement wanted these labs, they could not find them? Mess with bitcoin, then your into the financial crimes arena, a whole new group of laws for them to prosecute you under, while doing illegal activity. No more easier than it would...

It would prove how poor the quality is. If they don't test, they can claim plausible deniability

VAT on every package. You have to declare all packages from outside of EU and sign on them, pretty much. There goes any plausible deniability.

I suppose youre right, but i think doing things right would be a much better plan for long term success. Unless he's just looking for a quick buck.

Is it now also riskier to order from a EU source to a non EU land like switzerland?

We've been doing this since last year. BarBender remains vague in order to maintain plausible deniability when cornered. He willfully allows speculation to be mistaken for fact rather than setting the record straight and then uses this as an excuse, ie: misinformation.