DavidZ said:
Isn't saying that a man's fertility is "adequate" about as useful as saying that a man's T is "normal?"
I understand the issue, but I think it is an abstraction that lacks practical value.
We, on this board, understand that "normal testosterone," conventionally understood, is a statistical phenomenon that doesn't really say anything about what is optimal and healthy for the individual.
"Adequate fertility" only has meaning if a guy fathers a child. If he does, bingo, he is adequately fertile. But, if he doesn't, is he not adequately fertile? Who can say? You're right. "Adequate fertility" is pretty hard to pin down without the endpoint of fathering a child.
But all of this needlessly complicates the issue when SWALE was merely observing that appropriate TRT will not adversely affect a man's fertility. I would understand that to mean that whatever fertility level, adequate or not, a man comes to TRT with, he can expect that appropriate TRT will not adversely affect it.
Enhancement of fertility, or correction of "inadequate fertility" is a separate, but certainly closely-related, issue.