750 test should yield what result on blood work?

[MFAAS]

that's such bullshit. that would make you an 8.3x multiplier. not possible your test was way overdosed.

It is very possible. Studies have shown ranges of responses on the same dose and schedule from 4 to 9x multipliers. 180 mg pharma cyp puts me at a little over 1600 total. That is a little over 9x. 160 mg puts me at like 1440 total, also around 9x.

500 mg test cycle diminishes slightly but still gives between an 8x and 9x response. Check back at my post history, it was somewhere in the high 8.x range dose-response multiplier. Regardless, it is very possible and definitely shouldn't immediately be called bullshit.

It is very possible their test is somewhat overdosed, we don't really have any way to know for sure.

 

[Barbellsquad]

It is very possible. Studies have shown ranges of responses on the same dose and schedule from 4 to 9x multipliers. 180 mg pharma cyp puts me at a little over 1600 total. That is a little over 9x. 160 mg puts me at like 1440 total, also around 9x.

500 mg test cycle diminishes slightly but still gives between an 8x and 9x response. Check back at my post history, it was somewhere in the high 8.x range dose-response multiplier. Regardless, it is very possible and definitely shouldn't immediately be called bullshit.

It is very possible their test is somewhat overdosed, we don't really have any way to know for sure.

Agree with you. Me and my buddies use the same source and mine is highest test. Why should source even overdose every time i buy...makes no sense.

 

[Ambusher]

that's such bullshit. that would make you an 8.3x multiplier. not possible your test was way overdosed.

The upper end for a dose of 750 mg of Testosterone is 8816 ng/dL, so his “scoring” 6200ng/dL is quite achievable. If he were to perfectly metabolize and utilize the entire dose of Test, then 8816 is what he would see.

 

[grey]

If he were to perfectly metabolize and utilize the entire dose of Test, then 8816

What are you using as the calculation basis for these very exact numbers you are throwing out here?

 

[Piromanu87]

A thought occurs to me that free test is not bound, which means it can be metabolized. Maybe high free test means lower total test?

My total test did not seem low on the lower amount of the same stuff, though.

Scratching my head?

Not sure if you found the response to this. If you have low SHBG you will have lower total test and higher free test. Your body goes thru testosterone much faster with low SHBG.

 

[graciebjj]

The upper end for a dose of 750 mg of Testosterone is 8816 ng/dL, so his “scoring” 6200ng/dL is quite achievable. If he were to perfectly metabolize and utilize the entire dose of Test, then 8816 is what he would see.

Can you please show your work?

 

[graciebjj]

that's such bullshit. that would make you an 8.3x multiplier. not possible your test was way overdosed.

Not necessarily. Not that it matters a lot. There’s a ton of variance in how well people convert exogenous testosterone to blood levels, there’s variance in levels throughout the week depending on when you pin/draw. There could also be something simple overlooked like a low dose of nandrolone skewing results

 

[Barbellsquad]

Not sure if you found the response to this. If you have low SHBG you will have lower total test and higher free test. Your body goes thru testosterone much faster with low SHBG.

I have single digit SHBG, my total test 6200ng/dl

Can you please show your work?

It's not in English.

 

[grey]

I have single digit SHBG, my total test 6200ng/dl
It's not in English.

He wasn't asking you to show your work, he was asking @Ambusher to show his.

 

[Barbellsquad]

He wasn't asking you to show your work, he was asking @Ambusher to show his.

Oh my mad, sorry.

 

[grey]

Oh my mad, sorry.

No worries... always good to see results anyways!

 

[Ambusher]

Can you please show your work?

750 mg of Test yields roughly 72 percent of actual Test, which is 540. You think divide 540 by 175, and then by 7. Which yields .44081633. Multiply that number by 1,000,000 and you get 440,816.327. Divide that by 50 and you get 8816. Don’t ask me how it works, lol. But, it’s a formula I found here on MESO from 2010 and it converts the mg amount of Test to ng/dL.

 

[graciebjj]

750 mg of Test yields roughly 72 percent of actual Test, which is 540. You think divide 540 by 175, and then by 7. Which yields .44081633. Multiply that number by 1,000,000 and you get 440,816.327. Divide that by 50 and you get 8816. Don’t ask me how it works, lol. But, it’s a formula I found here on MESO from 2010 and it converts the mg amount of Test to ng/dL.

So you have no idea what any of the numbers mean along the way but you believe this to be the truth

 

[Ambusher]

So you have no idea what any of the numbers mean along the way but you believe this to be the truth

Testosterone Conversions mg->ng/dl?

Testosterone is normally measured in nanograms per deciliter (ng/dL.) Normally functioning adult male testicles produce an average of 7mg of testosterone per day, 1 milligram = 1,000,000 nanograms 1 liter = 10 deciliter There are 5 liters of blood in the average adult male body...

thinksteroids.com

Feel free to go through it, but I found it handy to approximate the upper end of the range that you would get on a certain mg of Test, or any compound, for that matter. Suprisingly, it lines up quite well with what studies show the levels to be in the people they give a certain of amount of Test.

 

[grey]

Feel free to go through it, but I found it handy to approximate the upper end of the range

Thanks! I appreciate the link. Hadn't seen that thread here before.

I would agree that this is an approximation only but nothing wrong with it as a very general rule of thumb.

 

[Gbro]

750 mg of Test yields roughly 72 percent of actual Test, which is 540. You think divide 540 by 175, and then by 7. Which yields .44081633. Multiply that number by 1,000,000 and you get 440,816.327. Divide that by 50 and you get 8816. Don’t ask me how it works, lol. But, it’s a formula I found here on MESO from 2010 and it converts the mg amount of Test to ng/dL.

Did you account for quantum flux?

 

[Ambusher]

Did you account for quantum flux?

Only quantum entanglement and wounded quark emission.

 

[LSDPowerlifting]

The problem with syringes larger than 3 cc is that it is very, very difficult to depress the plunger. The syringe is not just longer. It is wider. Physics. I tried 5 cc more than once. I ended up tossing all the 5 cc syringes. It was like trying to push wet concrete out the 25G needle. It might work with a much larger gauge needle.

Think of a woman standing on snowshoes, spreading her weight. Now think of her putting all her weight on little tiny heels. Or, think of a sharp knife point as opposed to pushing forward with the flat side of a piece of plywood. The smaller the plunger, the easier time you will have squirting that oil out.

Same here, I threw out all of my 5cc's.

Don't buy 5cc's people