A alternative testing method at home

This guide is for anyone who wants to test the identity and general purity of steroid raw powders (like testosterone esters) at home without sending them to a lab every time. It’s cheap, effective, and uses a method called TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography)... The same principle labs use, just simplified.




What You’ll Be Doing (In Simple Terms)

You’ll dissolve a bit of your raw steroid, drop it on a special test plate, let it travel up using a solvent mix, and then shine a UV light on it to see how far it traveled.

If you compare this to a known good sample (reference), you can:

Confirm it’s likely the same compound

See if it’s pure or has extra stuff in it

Spot fakes or underdosed raws


This is a qualitative and comparative tool... not a lab-grade purity percentage, but a reliable way to validate batches, especially for consistency, identity, and visible impurity detection.




PART 1: What You Need (Shopping List)

TLC Plates (Silica Gel 60 F254)

Get pre-coated plates. Size 5x10 cm is good.

Amazon or eBay: ~$30–$50 for a pack


UV Light (254 nm)

MUST be 254nm shortwave (not just blacklight)

Use a portable handheld UV lamp

Amazon: ~$60–$90


Capillary Spotting Tubes or Micro-Pipettes

For applying small drops on plates

~$5–$15 per pack of 100


Solvents (Your Mobile Phase)

n-Hexane and Ethyl Acetate (or premix 4:1 ratio)

Hardware store-grade can work (e.g. VM&P Naphtha for hexane)

Optional pre-mix from Sorbtech or FisherSci


Sample Vials or Small Jars

To dissolve your steroid sample


Developing Chamber (Glass Jar w/ Lid)

Mason jar, peanut butter jar, or similar

Line it with a paper towel inside


Safety Gear

Nitrile gloves

Safety glasses (especially for UV!)


Reference Sample

A trusted raw powder you know is legit (e.g. old batch from a verified source)


Still Air Box (Optional but Recommended)

A plastic tote with arm holes to prevent contamination and hold fumes in ( need to vent be safe don't be dumb)




PART 2: How to Do It

1. Prep Your Plate

Use a pencil (not a pen!) to draw a line ~1 cm from the bottom of the TLC plate — this is your baseline.

Label where each sample goes.


2. Make Your Sample Solution

Put a few mg of your raw powder in a small vial

Add 1 mL of ethanol or acetone (or same mobile phase you’re using)

Do the same with your reference


3. Spot the Plate

Use a capillary to touch a small dot of solution on the baseline

Do one for the unknown and one for the reference

Let dry completely (you can re-spot to build up the same dot)


4. Develop the Plate

Pour your 4:1 hexane:ethyl acetate mix into your jar (only ~5 mm deep)

Stick the TLC plate in vertically, silica side down, spots above the solvent

Close the lid and let the solvent rise almost to the top

Pull the plate out, mark the solvent front with pencil, let it dry


5. Visualize with UV

In a dark room or inside your still air box, shine the 254 nm UV light

You’ll see dark spots on a glowing green background

Circle the spots with pencil


6. Calculate Rf

Measure from the baseline to each spot center

Measure from the baseline to the solvent front

Rf = (distance of spot) / (distance of solvent front)

Compare unknown Rf to your reference Rf


7. Interpret Results

Same Rf, one clean spot? Probably same compound, looks good

Extra spots? Probably impure or cut

Different Rf than reference? Might be fake or mislabelled




PART 3: Extra Tips

Don’t touch the silica surface

Always use pencil to mark

Spot small... big spots smear

Let your spot fully dry before developing

If your spots don’t move, use more ethyl acetate in your solvent mix

If spots run off the plate, reduce polarity (more hexane)

Work in a ventilated area, solvents are flammable

Always compare unknowns side-by-side with a known good batch

Use a co-spot (both samples mixed in one dot) to confirm identity if needed


FAQ

Q: Can I use this without a reference? A: Not reliably. Without a confirmed good raw to compare to, TLC won’t tell you what you're looking at. It’s for comparison, not blind identification.

Q: Will this tell me the exact % purity? A: No. TLC is semi-quantitative. It will show if something is mostly clean or if it's contaminated — but not down to a precise number.

Q: Is this safer than guessing or injecting unknowns? A: Way safer. This method can’t guarantee sterility or clinical-grade analysis, but it can flag obvious fakes, cuts, or totally mismatched raws before you brew and inject.

Q: Isn’t this too “backyard chemist”? A: TLC is used in legit chemistry labs all over the world. You're doing it on a small scale, but the principle is sound and reproducible. When done carefully, TLC gives you real insight into your raws.

Q: Is this cheaper than Jano? A: After 2–3 batches, absolutely. A full TLC setup can cost under $200 and be reused over and over. Jano is still the gold standard for full quantification, but this is perfect for screening multiple batches. In fact I recommend testing at jano anyways and if you happen to get a good raw sample. Keep it and use it with this method.

Q: Can this test fake gear? A: Yes. If it’s not the real ester, it won’t move the same on the plate. You’ll catch bunk or mismatched compounds easily if you have a legit sample to compare to.



Final Note to Critics: This isn’t meant to replace professional HPLC or lab-grade MS testing. But for DIY quality control, TLC is a proven, chemistry-backed method that costs a fraction of a full lab. If done correctly, it’s accurate enough to validate whether a raw is consistent with your reference and it’s way better than blind trust. For the average home brewer or hobbyist chemist, it’s a valuable, repeatable tool for self-protection and cost savings.
 
I have all this in a way more detailed guide for the less lazy I'm willing to to share. But this is the most simplistic version I could condense for the low attention span prone. This is a personal project I've been working on and have been researching for awhile. Figured I'd share here. My parts come soon.
 
I came for the gainz, muscles and roids now I’m learning compound lab work and chemistry lol.

Now make some space in your homebrew room.
My setup is slowly turning into a lab anyways. Metal table stainless steel. Autoclave. Beakers. Funnels. Flasks. I guess making steroids made me wanna learn other things. This is all just insanely fun for me and I never feel bored of it. Maybe my calling is chemistry...Iv ended up doing more than just steroids as my setup has improved. This is one of the long term projects I really want to get good at. Always thought it was weird no one has a at home testing method.
 
Just test you raws man. I assume the way you've been all over the place on multiple platforms you are making and selling gear.. I have no problem with that... but spend the money , do it right and test your gear..
 
Just test you raws man. I assume the way you've been all over the place on multiple platforms you are making and selling gear.. I have no problem with that... but spend the money , do it right and test your gear..
This wasn't about avoiding testing gear. This was about an alternative method that wasn't exactly known in this community that could be used for harm reduction if someone needed it. It's a bit like the Roid test kit.
 
Thin Layer chromatography is used for simple identifications based of polarity … not to fucking test gear moron… that’s what Jano is for… that’s what HPLC is for…
 
Thin Layer chromatography is used for simple identifications based of polarity … not to fucking test gear moron… that’s what Jano is for… that’s what HPLC is for…
:)
TLC isn’t about purity quantity.. true. But to claim it’s useless for gear ID is clown-tier logic. TLC absolutely detects fakes when the compound isn’t present or when there's a mismatch in Rf vs a known reference. If a vial's supposed to contain tren, and the TLC shows zero signal where tren should run, that’s proof of absence... not rocket science.

Purity? No.
Presence/absence? Hell yes.
You’re confusing resolution power with analytical utility.

Jano runs full spec because he's paid to do quantitative analysis. Doesn’t mean a $2 TLC plate can’t red flag bunk gear in 5 minutes.

Stay mad.

TLC can give relative purity insight... not as a percentage, but visually. One clean, sharp spot ≠ pure compound, but multiple spots or streaking = contaminated or mixed sample. That’s qualitative impurity detection, which is a component of purity assessment. Anyone who’s ever run TLC in a real lab knows this.

Nobody said TLC replaces HPLC. That’s a strawman.
TLC flags fakes and cuts quickly, especially in conjunction with co-spotting and reference controls.
It’s not about lab-grade certs... it’s about triage and pattern detection.

Trying to gatekeep chemistry knowledge with insults just exposes your insecurity. If you can’t distinguish between qualitative and quantitative analytical tools, maybe sit out the analytical convo
 
Last edited:
:)
TLC isn’t about purity quantity.. true. But to claim it’s useless for gear ID is clown-tier logic. TLC absolutely detects fakes when the compound isn’t present or when there's a mismatch in Rf vs a known reference. If a vial's supposed to contain tren, and the TLC shows zero signal where tren should run, that’s proof of absence... not rocket science.

Purity? No.
Presence/absence? Hell yes.
You’re confusing resolution power with analytical utility.

Jano runs full spec because he's paid to do quantitative analysis. Doesn’t mean a $2 TLC plate can’t red flag bunk gear in 5 minutes.

Stay mad.
Didn't you buy some raws a while back you said you were gonna send in for testing??
 
Didn't you buy some raws a while back you said you were gonna send in for testing??
Yup. Still am. I move on my own timeline. If someone wants instant results, feel free to sponsor it. I’m juggling multiple analytical and purification tracks right now, and this project snowballed fast... especially after linking with a full-scale UGL lab that saw what I was building and asked to collaborate.

Funny how no one else here bothered attempting this, yet somehow I’m the one getting questioned.


This thread wasn’t for applause.. it was to share something most didn’t even know was possible. I’ll update when I feel like it. The work’s being done either way.
 
Last edited:
Yup. Still am. I move on my own timeline. If someone wants instant results, feel free to sponsor it. I’m juggling multiple analytical and purification tracks right now, and this project snowballed fast... especially after linking with a full-scale UGL lab that saw what I was building and asked to collaborate.

Funny how no one else here bothered attempting this, yet somehow I’m the one getting questioned.


This thread wasn’t for applause.. it was to share something most didn’t even know was possible. I’ll update when I feel like it. The work’s being done either way.
Let's be real... your a bozzo.. whatever..
 
Let's be real... your a bozzo.. whatever..
Right. Let's revist this conversation in a year. Promise you EVERYTHING I'm doing right now is going to effect this market for the better. Mark my words.

You can throw your little-nonsense insults all you want. I'm enjoying the opportunity at hand and it's only going to get better. What will you do? You will watch. You will say a lot of things about nothing. Or perhaps maybe later change your tune when people are contributing for pure raws. Which is a win for everyone.
 
In a year? You guys would have zero shipments from China, what are you going to test? Baking powder or turmeric lol.
Well I was referencing the current supply we do have can "be made better". Who knows what happens with raws later on. I just know what we do have can be made much much better.
 
Back
Top