jesus take the wheel
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
MESO-Rx Sponsor AASraw: GMP-Certified Steroid and Peptide API Manufacturer
- Thread starter AASraw
- Start date
Photon
Member
What do our more chemistry minded guys think is causing these issues? I've been around for over 20 years and even sourced powders myself before the Beijing Olympics in 08. I've never seen raw material like this.
Al3s
New Member
Excellent, I was looking those up at aliexpress but I was not sure if syringes would fit right
Feel free to post here too
I would take the claim with a grain of salt, I myself am not brave enough to infer that much.
Attachments
hcgfiend123456
Member
Welp looks like I am headed back to my TRT clinic for a while
IndividualMan
Member
i think they are tryingto screw people, one way or another.
In reality, this probably just means the people this vendor is buying their raws from are using horrendous, old equipment, to the point where it is literally falling apart.
Or they are transporting it mixed with other stuff, which would be even more stupid.
Lends more credibility to my idea of the circumstances/environment under which these things are produced being incredibly subpar nowadays, appearently not only on the human capital front, but also in regards to equipment.
then again, why were the first few batches of cyp better than this? are they really relegating Testosterone production (and other, easier compounds) to some team of chemistry dropout chuds? how can you fuck up production this much?
dinfar1337
Member
maybe you missed it
just scared of it being automated now that we're getting double compounds and theres not anyone checking it through manually.
Photon
Member
I think the more important question is
How does one order 2 bags of raws, receives 2 bags at the same time and 1 bag of raws brews and other doesn't?
dinfar1337
Member
do gcms in raws, where we actually found it xd oils cant be confirmed but we did in raws so theres that link from a meso test group we did back in summer. all it takes was reading the first 2 messages from @Photon
The output on the raw data is automated.maybe you missed it
just scared of it being automated now that we're getting double compounds and theres not anyone checking it through manually.
Double compounds is perfectly normal for multitude of reasons:
1) bad peak shape: not all compounds are perfectly volatile, so peaks of same compound may split
2) GCMS IDs peaks as "nearest" hit. Eg. to put it into perspective - if there is "pink" and "purple" in there, but GCMS doesn't have "pink" or "purple" in database but it has "magenta", then both will end up identified as "magenta"
Photon
Member
The NPP and TC purity is all over the place.
89-96%
It almost feels like different people are receiving different stuff..
I wonder what that the undissolvable one tests like..
The TRA and TRE so far seems to test within 1%, but the purity isn't good..
Will it help if I buy chocolate for my rep?
The-Squat
Subscriber
Looking promising at this point for TC, last 2 Test C reports shown here are 96% and 94.72%. That's pretty close but would like to see 96% 98% soon.
All the issues with dissolving are from 2 things, the 1st batches and non tested.
I agree with @Photon , we need to see the results of the undissolved raws.
All the issues with dissolving are from 2 things, the 1st batches and non tested.
I agree with @Photon , we need to see the results of the undissolved raws.
Photon
Member
Some vendors got lower..
This month.
Not just the first batch was bad either..
It's very odd
Similar threads
