The-Squat
Subscriber
No, sorry, was a customers blind test.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
MESO-Rx Sponsor AASraw: GMP-Certified Steroid and Peptide API Manufacturer
- Thread starter AASraw
- Start date
The-Squat
Subscriber
If you were already planing to send in a test of finished test e, it don't matter which.
If you still have the raws, I'd see if he would retest free, otherwise you can actually just take a dose and draw blood in a week and see where the number are also.
If it don't matter to you that much, just let it be.
I think in your case if it was me and having been on test for at least 15 years straight, I'd just pin and draw blood and see what that says.
With all said just do what you feel is right for you, I just don't agree with that result.
Was this from the little bit they still had in stock? Or the new batch they just got from the factory?
I pinned it for a week at the end of my blast, 1g/wk before I tested it. It had me higher than my finished oil from a domestic source.
I also talked to someone that used my HPLC to brew from the same batch. They came out at 301mg/ml on a 300mg/ml bench mark. Their jano has their name on it so I won't share it.
But I'm willing to send mine in bc I've already paid for raws testing and two oil tests and wasn't sure what I wanted to send in.
To alleviate any concerns about a blend I think I'll send the Test E 400mg/ml batch. I think it's worthwhile to do considering the recent criticism jano has faced. I will post my reports along with the raws results from the recent Test C batch from AASRAWS.
I would just make a tiny batch of 100mg/ml and assume %100 purity. That will make it simple to calculate the purity off the result.
Photon
Member
It doesn't really matter.
tbh the best way is probably to just brew at 80% with enough raws leftover to correct it if needed. If overdosed, add oil, simple. If under dosed, well you have a bigger problem now -- you have <80% junk on hand.
It seems is like Jano is more sensitive when it comes to raws <90. AB and Jano both seem to have a consensus with higher purity raws, but diverge when purity gets lower and lower. It looks like the other labs are picking up something else as purity, what it is, whether it is right, we don't really know.
hcgfiend123456
Member
Quit being gay
hcgfiend123456
Member
Who's ppd?
RocketSurge0n
Member
Tough look to go calling people gay on other boards and then come asking to be spoon fed.
The-Squat
Subscriber
A lot of high school kids on this board.
The-Squat
Subscriber
I don't agree with this at all.
AlexDavis43
Member
The-Squat
Subscriber
But that's too much work!
Photon
Member
It's be much easier if they were on this board or are even willing to answer questions. It's hard enough paying AB to run tests.
Id think the labs are all using different reference standards for detecting compounds. Jano makes their own I believe, where does AB come from? I recently approached a lab for testing of some weird compound and they pretty much told me they had to order the standard, gave me the link of the company they're ordering for and said they will charge it to me for it. (E.g Sigma Aldrich)
There was recent testing done by a vendor for both Jano and AB and it's clear that there exists a 3-5 difference in results as purity starts to drop. Something is obviously being missed out by one party or added incorrectly by the other. Also pretty clear from the Tren raws that I and this vendor tested. Both came back 85% but AB gave an extra 10%! Where's that come from?
The-Squat
Subscriber
I mentioned earlier this is leftover stock they've been selling since summer, maybe even spring of last year until at least three weeks ago
Photon
Member
A different lab can give you the extra 10%.
I'm not taking sides btw.
If anything I'm waiting for AB to give me a quote.
Similar threads
