MESO-Rx Sponsor AASraw: GMP-Certified Steroid and Peptide API Manufacturer

My top 3 are based off 100% not 91%

I would just add 10% to 91% to get it to be close to 100% then add more to the desire needed, I like 3% added.

91 + 10% = 100.1
91 + 13% = 102.83

250 / 100 = 2.5

2.5 x 100.1 = 250.25
2.5 x 102.83 = 257.075
I was just showing the simple math. Target mg, divided by percent of compound, times what ever % extra you want to add.= amount needed
Basically the same as you did above in a simple form.
 
I was just showing the simple math. Target mg, divided by percent of compound, times what ever % extra you want to add.= amount needed
Basically the same as you did above in a simple form.
That's what I thought, wasn't calling you on it. I wasn't sure if I came across clear in the original post.

Been a long day in the lab and will be another tomorrow lol.
 
@Diesel77

I'm going to believe the measuring method you mentioned is the biggest part of your problem, syringes and beakers are not accurate, the bigger they are the more they are off and the cheaper they are the more they are off.

As @Sampei says both can be off but you will not be accurate this way either.
What do you suggest as the most accurate method ? I thought weighing a known volume of oil was a better solution than beakers . And I figured syringes were also accurate . Open to suggestions
 
So my batch that tested 99% with AB that we can consider 98+, I'm going with 96% on the caution side. Still not use to seeing 99%, which is most likely 98+. It's not a big issue to me.

Even though the look is different a tad and a brighter tint than usual, it's very clean, it is pumping through the filters as usual.

This must be the cleaned up batch or post no melt batch or the no melt batch was something else, since nobody will test it we will never know.
 
So my batch that tested 99% with AB that we can consider 98+, I'm going with 96% on the caution side. Still not use to seeing 99%, which is most likely 98+. It's not a big issue to me.

Even though the look is different a tad and a brighter tint than usual, it's very clean, it is pumping through the filters as usual.

This must be the cleaned up batch or post no melt batch or the no melt batch was something else, since nobody will test it we will never know.
What are you considering no melt batch?
 
What are you considering no melt batch?
I think it was the 1st batches made and shipped with the pre orders, I waited for pro order to end.

It's hard to tell about the test c no melt without any tests done on the raws.

Could have been the wrong items shipped as it was crunch time.
 
I think it was the 1st batches made and shipped with the pre orders, I waited for pro order to end.

It's hard to tell about the test c no melt without any tests done on the raws.

Could have been the wrong items shipped as it was crunch time.
It tested at 95. 11/28 batch.
 
Last edited:
At one point the filtering slowed down a bit, still going just slower.

This is not normal and goes along with the filtering issues.
Are you using polycap(capsule filters) or bottle tops?

Just curious because I haven't noticed anything out of the ordinary filtering through my polycaps with these recent batches of Test C from them. Finished product is a little more yellow tinted than normal but thats about it.
 
My latest batch also has a slight yellow tint to it compared to a previous batch of raws that brewed clear.

Jano tests should be ready next week on both batches
 
Back
Top