Apotheka Bayer Rimobolan 100mg/ml amps

[JackSmooth]

I sent @Apotheka rimobolan to @Weights & Measures and am pleased with both the product and lab service itself.

For those who can’t see the pic it tested as 110mg/ml.

Big thank you to @24hreup-rep for paying half of the lab testing fee.

 

[picholas]

View attachment 101239
View attachment 101238
I sent @Apotheka rimobolan to @Weights & Measures and am pleased with both the product and lab service itself.

For those who can’t see the pic it tested as 110mg/ml.

Big thank you to @24hreup-rep for paying half of the lab testing fee.

Thanks for checking out the new source and contributing back.

 

[ProfessorX]

Thanks for the effort....BUT...


Did you send the actual ampule or as an unmarked sample

My experience with labs using GC/MS:

Identify and purity of an API - Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (powder/raw) ONLY....

Tablets and finished oils were never quantified correctly using GC/MS

Example: 100 mg Bayer (110 mg)

LC/MS/MS
HPLC

For quantifying tablets and finished oils (formulated)

It would be best to send 2 unmarked samples (one sample being a known or control sample) if using this testing method to quantity and check their accuracy

This Assay/GC/MS result looks more like SteroidCheck....and

Their quantitative results for formulated or finished products (tablets/oils) were never accurate unfortunately (mg-mg/mL)

 

[movingiron88]

View attachment 101239
View attachment 101238
I sent @Apotheka rimobolan to @Weights & Measures and am pleased with both the product and lab service itself.

For those who can’t see the pic it tested as 110mg/ml.

Big thank you to @24hreup-rep for paying half of the lab testing fee.

Thanks for testing brotha. I think it would be good to post in W&M thread.

 

[24hreup-rep]

Thanks for the effort....BUT...


Did you send the actual ampule or as an unmarked sample

My experience with labs using GC/MS:

Identify and purity of an API - Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (powder/raw) ONLY....

Tablets and finished oils were never quantified correctly using GC/MS

Example: 100 mg Bayer (110 mg)

LC/MS/MS
HPLC

For quantifying tablets and finished oils (formulated)

It would be best to send 2 unmarked samples (one sample being a known or control sample) if using this testing method to quantity and check their accuracy

This Assay/GC/MS result looks more like SteroidCheck....and

Their quantitative results for formulated or finished products (tablets/oils) were never accurate unfortunately (mg-mg/mL)

He sent it unmarked

 

[ProfessorX]

He sent it unmarked

Nice.....thanks

 

[master.on]

Yet more and more made up BS
These "reports" mean nothing and are probably made up.

1 You don't identify any compounds in GC-MS using its retention time alone.
That's the whole purpose of MS to break up compounds into smaller fragments yielding a (virtually) unique m/z chart for each compound.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry - Wikipedia
No m/z chart or library match report was shown.

2 GC-MS ain't very good at quantifying. That's why HPLC should be used.

3 No indication on how they calibrated GC-MS for quantifying, or what peak they used for that.

 

[rpbb]

Yet more and more made up BS
These "reports" mean nothing and are probably made up.

1 You don't identify any compounds in GC-MS using its retention time alone.
That's the whole purpose of MS to break up compounds into smaller fragments yielding a (virtually) unique m/z chart for each compound.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry - Wikipedia
No m/z chart or library match report was shown.

2 GC-MS ain't very good at quantifying. That's why HPLC should be used.

3 No indication on how they calibrated GC-MS for quantifying, or what peak they used for that.

How about you go buy an testing rig and do this stuff yourself

 

[master.on]

How about you go buy an testing rig and do this stuff yourself

There's no money to be made in steroid testing as @Dr JIM cleverly pointed out

and its illegal in the States
also, uncle Sam harasses testing labs abroad, even if gear is legal there. Just look at Simec, it stopped receiving samples mailed from outside Europe.

 

[ProfessorX]

Yet more and more made up BS
These "reports" mean nothing and are probably made up.

1 You don't identify any compounds in GC-MS using its retention time alone.
That's the whole purpose of MS to break up compounds into smaller fragments yielding a (virtually) unique m/z chart for each compound.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry - Wikipedia
No m/z chart or library match report was shown.

2 GC-MS ain't very good at quantifying. That's why HPLC should be used.

3 No indication on how they calibrated GC-MS for quantifying, or what peak they used for that.

It would be nice to see more info like this:





(Library Match/ DataBase Standard)
Test Propionate / Benzyl Benzoate



But again, this is just to identify and not quantify (mg/mL)

I honestly don’t know enough about testing methods

Only my experience with using labs abroad and US Toxicology Labs

GC/MS quantitative results (mg/mL) were never accurate with finished products Vs HPLC / LC/MS/MS (identify-quantify)

For raws is was fine (identify - purity)

I do appreciate the testing tho

THX @JackSmooth

I’d just like to see more results for finished oils

 

[rpbb]

There's no money to be made in steroid testing as @Dr JIM cleverly pointed out

and its illegal in the States
also, uncle Sam harasses testing labs abroad, even if gear is legal there. Just look at Simec, it stopped receiving samples mailed from outside Europe.

Than go away, you're not helping

 

[master.on]

Than go away, you're not helping

Helping what?
Helping scammers and liars get away with it?
Then no, I'm not helping.

 

[Turkish Pharmacy]

Than go away, you're not helping

He seems to be helping. He told exactly what should have been done to get the real results in his reply here:

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/apotheka-bayer-rimobolan-100mg-ml-amps.134394970/#post-2294970