Bayer RIMOBOLAN 100mg amps

[mands]

As promised and just a little late...

Please see attached for testing on the Bayer RIMOBOLAN amps.

mands

 

[RThoads]

very nice.
Thanks again @mands

 

[franchise24]

@mands awesome testing. In depth and thank you. We will soon have some Abdi Ibrahim Anapolon to be tested and see what the results will be.

 

[mands]

I am actually going to introduce the lab that does my testing. He will be able to start his own thread so that he can answer any questions.

@Analyzer has done a great job and has been very helpful with my current testing. I would invite him to start a thread in the steroid lab testing section.

He will be open for MESO members to utilize very soon.

mands

 

[AnTabolic73]

And I'm not defending @jano , I never used his service, nor will I ever.

But It's interesting to me that you totally discredited him, and then introduce a new source for a similar service.

 

[mands]

And I'm not defending @jano , I never used his service, nor will I ever.

But It's interesting to me that you totally discredited him, and then introduce a new source for a similar service.

This is a joke correct?

I never once discredited him. He did that himself. I actually welcomed him and was hoping he would be good for MESO. I never discredited his type of testing either. He offered MS and HPLC testing as does @Analyzer.

I believe done by a educated and competent person that this type of testing is great. There is a ton of human error that can occur in testing and it's only as good as the tester.

If you don't believe in the tester than that's okay not to use them.

mands

 

[Ripped]

And I'm not defending @jano , I never used his service, nor will I ever.

But It's interesting to me that you totally discredited him, and then introduce a new source for a similar service.

I got no skin in this but I'm sure if you tag @mands he will respond to you.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Edit : beat me to it mands.

 

[mands]

This is a joke correct?

I never once discredited him. He did that himself. I actually welcomed him and was hoping he would be good for MESO. I never discredited his type of testing either. He offered MS and HPLC testing as does @Analyzer.

I believe done by a educated and competent person that this type of testing is great. There is a ton of human error that can occur in testing and it's only as good as the tester.

If you don't believe in the tester than that's okay not to use them.

mands

Also, did you see here or ever see at PM any data like I just posted? We asked him many times and he never once posted it up.

mands

 

[ronin17]

This is a joke correct?

I never once discredited him. He did that himself. I actually welcomed him and was hoping he would be good for MESO. I never discredited his type of testing either. He offered MS and HPLC testing as does @Analyzer.

I believe done by a educated and competent person that this type of testing is great. There is a ton of human error that can occur in testing and it's only as good as the tester.

If you don't believe in the tester than that's okay not to use them.

mands

Damn you @mands. How dare you make something available to us that helps us all out! WTF are you thinking?

 

[ronin17]

No good deed ever goes unpunished on meso.

 

[AnTabolic73]

I just found it interesting is all

 

[mands]

I just found it interesting is all

Okay I wasn't sure it was a joke but when I say you tagged Jano I figured you were up to something.

Please elaborate why you think it's interesting. I would like to hear your thoughts on the matter as you can see I stated mine.

mands

 

[AnTabolic73]

Interesting as in a strange coincidence. Didn't mean anything by it, I'm sure you have good intentions.

And no I'm not being sarcastic. I know it's hard to tell on the forums.

 

[mands]

Interesting as in a strange coincidence. Didn't mean anything by it, I'm sure you have good intentions.

And no I'm not being sarcastic. I know it's hard to tell on the forums.

I will tell you this. My intentions are pure as they alway are on MESO. You can always PM @Millard Baker if you ever need a judge of character about me.

I could see your concerns if I all of sudden started testing things for the members here and were charging them. This is not that. I am providing the members here with another avenue to keep them safe and have sources held accountable. That's all.

I hope you can understand that, because your statement stating you "didn't mean anything by it" surely states you did mean something or wouldn't have posted it as I see it.

Have a good evening.

mands

 

[mercury]

As promised and just a little late...

Please see attached for testing on the Bayer RIMOBOLAN amps.

mands

something does not add up when you look at the data sheet,

sample was run at least for a week

I have never seen lab using 2 types of equipment GC/MS and HPLC for one test

looks to me more like somebody putting a bunch of sheets together without making too much sense.

I see spectra run on 13 April then on 19 April they do not match each other

 

[mands]

something does not add up when you look at the data sheet,

sample was run at least for a week

I have never seen lab using 2 types of equipment GC/MS and HPLC for one test

looks to me more like somebody putting a bunch of sheets together without making too much sense.

I see spectra run on 13 April then on 19 April they do not match each other

They sample was ran twice. The first result he used an external standard and good for semi-quantitative. He then ran the sample a few days later and updated with new standard.

mands

 

[mercury]

They sample was ran twice. The first result he used an external standard and good for semi-quantitative. He then ran the sample a few days later and updated with new standard.

mands

do you realize what you wrote ? you just confirmed that they guy does not have clue what he is doing.

you cannot use your sample as standard.

like he is taking the test results from thin air

There is no semi-quantitative term used as a definition for HPLC on GC/MS testing. it would mean that the testing is inconclusive or presumptive.

 

[mands]

do you realize what you wrote ? you just confirmed that they guy does not have clue what he is doing.

you cannot use your sample as standard.

like he is taking the test results from thin air

There is no semi-quantitative term used as a definition for HPLC on GC/MS testing. it would mean that the testing is inconclusive or presumptive.

I'm sorry I stated that wrong. He didn't use my sample as a standard. He used the external standard for the second testing as the first test showed 86mg and he said there was some issues. I will let @Analyzer explain if you need it.

I just looked back I did not ever say he used my sample as standard. Keep picking bud.

mands

 

[ChestRockwell]

Thanks for posting this @mands

This checks out very well with my anecdotal experiences with the product.

 

[kunh]

I'm sorry I stated that wrong. He didn't use my sample as a standard. He used the external standard for the second testing as the first test showed 86mg and he said there was some issues. I will let @Analyzer explain if you need it.

I just looked back I did not ever say he used my sample as standard. Keep picking bud.

mands

so he did not no WHAT ws spposd to be in ther or how MUCH was supposed to be in there, rite?

I do have a question @mercury

How did he identify what the samples were that I sent in for testing? They were not marked or nothing was indicated on them what they were? He just happened to guess the substance and the mg.?

For not being qualified as you stated he must be the luckiest dude in the world.

mands

but he smhow KNOW that 86mg iz bad and needs rtest?

INTERESTING