Bill Roberts, Q regarding Cl I vs. Cl II steroids

No, see, that's where you're wrong bro. The model is a fiction that exists in the ether, holds a mythos, a mystique among bodybuilders.... and yet is totally fucking conjured out of someone's imagination.

I could have come up with something equally valid by just classifiying test/mast/tren in separate classes, place nandrolone in the 19-nortestosterone group, and then throwing darts at a dartboard to pick the rest at random.
I meant like in theory it would be best to stack from all 3 classes. I think what bill was trying to do with this is get the benefits of using a test, 19 nor, and dht all in one cycle with the idea that it would be optimal.
 
At the end of the day I think its best to stack drugs you have used before and know they work for you. There will be synergy no matter what the stack, I think thats just how steroids work.
 
Im a big believer in hitting every pathway for synergy. Test, slin, gh, and yk-11 is an amazing synergy. So what has worked for me is hitting the AR pathway, growth factors like gh insulin, and the myostatin pathway. In my opioning there would be more of an argument in the synergy of hitting every pathway over stacking drugs from each class.
 
When it comes to just the gear it probably is more about total mg and what gives u less sides. Imo

Like test tren " synergistic" some people cant eat or sleep on how can u grow like that and how can that be synergistic to that individual?

kinda throws a wrench in this synergy theory.

It does seem like it's best just go back to the basics. Start with test build that up then start experimentation with 1 anabolic stacked at a time an learn ur own body an personal response

Like u juice an some other guys love dbol
Too me its shit.
At the end of the day I think its best to stack drugs you have used before and know they work for you. There will be synergy no matter what the stack, I think thats just how steroids work.
 
Back
Top