CNraws, Private source for members only

Just because I acknowledged hearing a rumor doesn’t mean I co-signed it. That’s basic reading comprehension.

As for “where did I see it?”... it's been floating around Telegram circles for a while. No, I don’t owe you a footnote citation. Anyone who’s been paying attention across platforms knows there’s chatter. Doesn’t mean it’s true. Doesn’t mean I believe it. I literally said I don’t.

Lashing out like a forum hall monitor having a meltdown over nothing isn’t the flex you think it is.

I’ll say it one more time for those in the back:
Mentioning a rumor ≠ spreading it.
Saying “I believe in his integrity” ≠ smearing.
Telling a rumor that only a bunch of little retards like you and others read on stupid telegram channel is = to showing what kind of a retard you are.

I mean you are in all the shitty telegram channels, because the few I'm, where guys that have been around 20+ years not one person would waste his time and oxygen in writing stuff like that.

Me having a meltdown? Lol kid
Why don't you go back to the communities that loves you.

You have 9 posts out of 10 fill with shit and useless crap. If I didn't know you I would think you were the alt of RekTest or Iris.
You useless the same
 
Telling a rumor that only a bunch of little retards like you and others read on stupid telegram channel is = to showing what kind of a retard you are.

I mean you are in all the shitty telegram channels, because the few I'm, where guys that have been around 20+ years not one person would waste his time and oxygen in writing stuff like that.

Me having a meltdown? Lol kid
Why don't you go back to the communities that loves you.

You have 9 posts out of 10 fill with shit and useless crap. If I didn't know you I would think you were the alt of RekTest or Iris.
You useless the same
Ah, classic. When someone doesn’t have a real counterpoint, they just throw insults like it’s 2006 Xbox Live. Lol

Let me walk you through this slowly: really really slowly

I said I saw rumors in some Telegram groups.

I explicitly said I don’t believe them.

I even said I think Jano has integrity.
Yet somehow that turned into a full-on meltdown from you, as if my post threatened your religion.


You keep flexing this "20+ year vet" badge, but all I’m seeing is someone who can’t read past a sentence without flying off the handle. That’s not wisdom.... it’s emotional fragility.

And no, I'm not anyone's alt. I'm just someone with critical thinking skills and a working brain. If you're triggered by mentioning a rumor with zero endorsement, that’s on you. Maybe channel that energy into something useful instead of typing entire essays attacking people who didn’t even insult you.



But hey if saying "I believe in his integrity" is what set you off, maybe you're not defending Jano. You're just desperate for a reason to swing at shadows.
 
Ah, classic. When someone doesn’t have a real counterpoint, they just throw insults like it’s 2006 Xbox Live. Lol

Let me walk you through this slowly: really really slowly

I said I saw rumors in some Telegram groups.

I explicitly said I don’t believe them.

I even said I think Jano has integrity.
Yet somehow that turned into a full-on meltdown from you, as if my post threatened your religion.


You keep flexing this "20+ year vet" badge, but all I’m seeing is someone who can’t read past a sentence without flying off the handle. That’s not wisdom.... it’s emotional fragility.

And no, I'm not anyone's alt. I'm just someone with critical thinking skills and a working brain. If you're triggered by mentioning a rumor with zero endorsement, that’s on you. Maybe channel that energy into something useful instead of typing entire essays attacking people who didn’t even insult you.



But hey if saying "I believe in his integrity" is what set you off, maybe you're not defending Jano. You're just desperate for a reason to swing at shadows.

And it was commanded, Thou shalt shun the unbeliever who questions He who Seeth All Things...

IMG_1080.webp
 
"on purpose" is really a terrible saying. :rolleyes:

There is always a picture of goods being sent out. That's our rules, including Photon's. The picture had been shown in few pages ago. Whatever, shit happened and what we need to do is to solve it. Photon is keeping in touch and he will get a solution. Thank you for concern!
 
"on purpose" is really a terrible saying. :rolleyes:

There is always a picture of goods being sent out. That's our rules, including Photon's. The picture had been shown in few pages ago. Whatever, shit happened and what we need to do is to solve it. Photon is keeping in touch and he will get a solution. Thank you for concern!
don't listen to that idiot schoolofretard, you are working with your clients to solve the issues, that's what we expect from a good dealer. Sending not good raws has happened to everyone, the difference between a good source and a bad one is that a good source will make it right.
 
don't listen to that idiot schoolofretard, you are working with your clients to solve the issues, that's what we expect from a good dealer. Sending not good raws has happened to everyone, the difference between a good source and a bad one is that a good source will make it right.

Thanks and hug you, mate! ;)
 
@Sampei


A few pages ago, you were right there with me saying the same thing: either Photon got sent degraded raws or he got bad raws to begin with.... and you literally said “that’s the only fucking option.” I agreed. We all did. That wasn’t slander, it was process-of-elimination reasoning based on the photo evidence and batch consistency


1000184035.webp







Now suddenly you're flipping the script, trying to make me look like I was attacking the source, when I’ve done nothing but defend them publicly. I literally got refunded. I said they were responsive. I praised their customer service. And yet here you are, twisting my words just so you can swing at me.


Sampei, I’m not even mad at this point.... Just confused how you managed to do a full 180 on your own logic

You, on the other hand? You flipped just to take a swing at me. It’s not about the raws for you. It’s about trying to win a pissing contest you started in your own head.

And for what? A few forum likes? Congrats?? You’re arguing against your own posts now.

It’s not about loyalty to the source for you.... it’s about using the source to take a shot at me. And that’s weak. That’s not respect, that’s opportunism?????

You don’t get to rewrite what you said. I have receipts. You said yourself that the only explanation was that bad raws were sent. So if you're calling me an idiot for repeating that logic now, what does that make you???



Either keep it real or stop talking. Because from where I’m sitting, your whole vibe right now is less “defender of the source” and more “fragile ego doing damage control.”


And just so everyone’s fucking clear.... I like this source. I’ve backed them publicly, even when I had every reason not. I said I’d test it first, and if it came back solid, I’d pay them anyway... even after they already refunded me. I could’ve been a scumbag, taken the product and the refund and disappeared. But I didn’t. I acted in good faith.

So stop trying to paint me as some villainous asshole when all I did was call out an obvious inconsistency.. the same exact conclusion you yourself said was the only possible option a few pages ago. Agreeing right along with me whether you know or not

I’m not the one switching sides. I’m not the one rewriting history. You want to kiss the source’s ass now? Cool. So do I!!!! They’ve treated me right?!! But don’t pretend your sudden loyalty isn’t fueled by ego and your obsession with dunking on me. Be real

And seriously.... Sampai.
Buddy. Pal...... take your own advice, pop a Xanax, and chill the fuck out. Or block me. Either way, stop acting like you’re the moral authority in here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top