wanted to get peoples opinions on this
over the years different compounds and choices seem to be changing, you hear some old timers who were dbol only or some who swear by deca and sustanon, it seems to be leaning more now towards primo and test, now with the shortages everyone seems to be going eq and test etc, regardless of this looking back as far as the 60s they all seem to have very good physiques
my question is this 90 percent of cycles start with the foundation of testosterone regardless of esters as it is the bio identical hormone, the secondary compounds other than affects that each compound might have wether its dht based or its a 19 nor, such as deca helping with joints or anavar potentially helping with visceral fat, or primo or mast being deployed so you can help keep your e2 in check, plus the synergy of the compounds working with each other
do any of these compounds actually build more muscle tissue than an another compound relative to the dose, im not talking about water here from raised e2 levels, because take dbol and you put 5 pound on overnight it seems like, im talking about solid tissue
if you took an amount of test that you didnt aromatise on lets say 300, 300t & primo vs 300 t and 300 deca, do all compounds accrue muscle tissue at the same rate if all variables are the same diet, supplements, timings etc
asking this question because iv seen a lot of conflicting views on this where some people believe one thing and others believe the opposite

over the years different compounds and choices seem to be changing, you hear some old timers who were dbol only or some who swear by deca and sustanon, it seems to be leaning more now towards primo and test, now with the shortages everyone seems to be going eq and test etc, regardless of this looking back as far as the 60s they all seem to have very good physiques
my question is this 90 percent of cycles start with the foundation of testosterone regardless of esters as it is the bio identical hormone, the secondary compounds other than affects that each compound might have wether its dht based or its a 19 nor, such as deca helping with joints or anavar potentially helping with visceral fat, or primo or mast being deployed so you can help keep your e2 in check, plus the synergy of the compounds working with each other
do any of these compounds actually build more muscle tissue than an another compound relative to the dose, im not talking about water here from raised e2 levels, because take dbol and you put 5 pound on overnight it seems like, im talking about solid tissue
if you took an amount of test that you didnt aromatise on lets say 300, 300t & primo vs 300 t and 300 deca, do all compounds accrue muscle tissue at the same rate if all variables are the same diet, supplements, timings etc
asking this question because iv seen a lot of conflicting views on this where some people believe one thing and others believe the opposite
