Crazy how much difference there is between just 100 vs 200 vs 300 test

marsupial

Member
Whether it’s bulking, cutting, or maingaining. Progress is far faster and more productive at a higher dose. It seems exponential too. That old study demonstrating log-linear gains from test 150 vs 300 vs 500 vs 600 was probably legit at least in that one aspect. 100 really isn’t much better than natty for most people unless you’re older (40+) and hypogonadal because of that.
 
That said, obviously more health risks with a higher dose. Can be mitigated enough by keeping body fat low, blood donations, not letting E2 run high, cardio, etc
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top