Cyclist Floyd Landis - Doping

Michael Scally MD

Doctor of Medicine
10+ Year Member
Blood Brothers
Floyd Landis, Lance Armstrong and Doping Allegations - WSJ.com

Cyclist Floyd Landis gives an exclusive tour through what he and others say is a culture of systematic doping in the sport.

By REED ALBERGOTTI And VANESSA O'CONNELL

Nine days into the 2004 Tour de France, the U.S. Postal Service cycling team, led by Lance Armstrong, checked into a hotel near the village of Saint-Léonard-de-Noblat.

It was July 12, one of two rest days on the Tour—the rare breaks that give riders a chance to rest and gird themselves for the punishing climbs and sprints that make this the most depleting event in professional cycling.

According to one of the U.S. Postal team's most prominent riders at the time, Floyd Landis, one room at the hotel had been set aside for a secret procedure.

Outside its door, Mr. Landis said, team staff members were stationed at each end of the hall to make sure nobody showed up unannounced. The riders were told before they went into the room not to talk when they got inside, he said. The smoke detectors had been taken down, he said, plastic was taped over the heater and the air-conditioning unit, and anything with a hole in it was taped over. The purpose, Mr. Landis figured, was to obscure the view of any hidden camera.

The riders on the team who participated in this procedure lay down on the bed, two at a time, Mr. Landis said, with a doctor on each side. Mr. Landis said he got a blood transfusion. He said he also saw Mr. Armstrong and two other team members, George Hincapie and José Luis Rubiera, taking blood. He said he didn't see any other riders getting transfusions that day.

The procedure, which enhances performance by boosting a rider's red-blood-cell counts, is considered cheating by the International Cycling Union, the sport's governing body.

Mr. Landis said that he isn't sure what happened to the empty blood bags, but that on other occasions he had seen team staffers dispose of them by cutting them into tiny pieces and flushing them down the toilet.

On July 25, after more than 2,000 miles of racing, the U.S. Postal team rode down the Champs-Élysées in Paris and over the finish line. Mr. Armstrong, the team's lead rider, had won by a dominant margin of more than six minutes. It was Mr. Armstrong's sixth victory in a row, a record.

Mr. Landis won't be riding in this year's Tour de France, which begins Saturday. He has few friends left in professional cycling. This spring, he launched an effort to expose what he says is the sordid reality of the sport. In hours of interviews with The Wall Street Journal in May, Mr. Landis detailed how he had used performance-enhancing drugs extensively during his career, and alleged that Mr. Armstrong and some others had done the same.

Three other former U.S. Postal riders told the Journal in interviews that there was doping on the team during the time Mr. Armstrong was its lead rider, and one of them admitted that he himself had doped. Several other riders said they had never observed such activity during their time with the team.

Doping is a scourge in professional athletics, and pro cycling has seen numerous scandals and suspensions over the past decade. The picture painted by Mr. Landis in the interviews, and in a series of emails he wrote to cycling sponsors in May, provides the most detailed view yet of what may be one of the biggest and most intricately coordinated cheating conspiracies in sports history. It involves blood transfusions taken in a bus on a remote alpine road, riders wearing testosterone patches to bed, and an operative posing as an autograph-seeking fan to deliver a bag of blood to a rider after a race.

Messrs. Armstrong, Hincapie and Rubiera didn't respond to requests for comment about Mr. Landis's allegations of doping. Speaking to reporters in May, Mr. Armstrong dismissed the accusations in Mr. Landis's emails as untrue, though he said he wasn't going to comment on specific claims.

"Floyd lost his credibility a long time ago," Mr. Armstrong said. "We have a person who has been under oath several times with a completely different version, written a book with a completely different version, someone that took money. He said he has no proof. It is his word versus ours. We like our word. We like where we stand and we like our credibility."

Mr. Landis was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France victory for doping, then lied about what he had done in his 2007 book, "Positively False," in which he also said he had no evidence that Mr. Armstrong had doped.

Mr. Armstrong and his advisers said Mr. Landis used the threat of going public with his accusations to try to get a job riding on Team Radio Shack, Mr. Armstrong's current team. Mr. Landis said he did ask for a job on the team last winter, but made no threats in the process.

Federal investigators are looking into Mr. Landis's allegations. The probe is being led by Jeff Novitzky, a special agent for the Food and Drug Administration's Office of Criminal Investigations who led the investigation of the Bay Area Laboratory Cooperative case that implicated many professional athletes in steroid use. Investigators are examining whether the U.S. Postal team defrauded its sponsors by using performance-enhancing drugs while vowing to race cleanly. Mr. Landis said he has shared with investigators details of many of the incidents he described in interviews with the Journal.

Chad Gerlach, who rode with the U.S. Postal team before Messrs. Armstrong and Landis were on it, said he's inclined to believe Mr. Landis's account of widespread doping based on what he saw during his own career. "I believe it because I have seen it personally," he said. "I am not ready to out my friends or provide names. I just saw it. It's just a systematic thing."

Mr. Landis's introduction to the elite ranks of professional cycling came in late 2001 when he was offered a contract to race for the U.S. Postal team. As a first step, he'd been invited to Austin, Texas, to participate in a training camp where the team members could get to know each other.

One evening during the camp, a handful of team members piled into a black Chevrolet Suburban for a night on the town, with Mr. Armstrong serving as the master of ceremonies.

Mr. Landis had met Mr. Armstrong briefly in the past, but most of what he knew about the world's most famous cyclist was what he'd read in Mr. Armstrong's 2000 memoir, "It's Not About the Bike." Mr. Landis had devoured the book, in which Mr. Armstrong chronicled his comeback from testicular cancer and portrayed himself as a modest and devoted family man.

Mr. Armstrong took the wheel of the Suburban and roared off through the streets. Stop signs didn't rate more than a tap of the brake, Mr. Landis said. Some traffic signals were wholly ignored and speed limits went unheeded. In the middle of the trip, Mr. Landis said, another rider asked, jokingly, "Are there no cops in this town?"

The journey ended at the Yellow Rose, a strip club on the north side of town. Don King, the club's general manager, said Mr. Armstrong and other cyclists on his teams have been coming to the club for about a decade. The riders were ushered into a booth. They ordered drinks and mingled with the dancers.

Later that night, some of the cyclists drove downtown to the offices of the agency that represents Mr. Armstrong. There, the party accelerated, according to Mr. Landis. Four strippers arrived at the offices with two bouncers and began performing a private show for the cyclists and others, he said. Mr. Landis and another young rider who attended, Walker Ferguson, said some people were snorting what appeared to be cocaine.

Mr. Armstrong didn't respond to requests for comment about Mr. Landis's description of the party. His lawyer, Tim Herman of Austin, said: "Mr. Armstrong had no contact with strippers or cocaine."

He was once one of Lance Armstrong's trusted teammates. Now Floyd Landis alleges that Armstrong's US Postal Service cycling team was involved in an elaborate doping scheme. WSJ's Simon Constable talks to reporter Reed Albergotti about the story.

Mr. Landis said he was surprised that Mr. Armstrong would be at such a party, but not offended. Mr. Landis had been raised by a Mennonite family in Pennsylvania's Amish Country but had distanced himself from the strict morality of his upbringing. If Mr. Armstrong was different in private than he was in public, he said, he could live with that.

"I made up my mind at that point that he's got his image, and then he's got the reality," Mr. Landis said. "He was the best bicycle racer in the world. I could respect that part, and I was happy to be around him for that."

By the time of the 2001 camp, Mr. Landis had been a professional cyclist for three years. He'd heard that the elite cyclists at the most grueling races used exotic and prohibited blood additives and synthetic drugs. Far from being repelled by this, he said, he had come to assume doping was part of the sport and, if he joined a top team, would be part of his job.

During the camp, Mr. Landis said, he had a private conversation with Mr. Armstrong's team director, Johan Bruyneel. Mr. Landis said he told Mr. Bruyneel that he wanted to be one of the eight riders who would ride with Mr. Armstrong in the Tour de France and that whatever he needed to do to improve beyond the typical training, he was willing to do. According to Mr. Landis, Mr. Bruyneel told him to just keep training, and when the time came, if it was necessary, they would figure it out.

Though nothing explicit was said about doping, Mr. Landis said, he believed the subtext—that Mr. Landis was willing to take performance-enhancing drugs—was clear to Mr. Bruyneel. "The fact that he didn't totally dismiss it was all I really needed to know."

Mr. Bruyneel did not respond to requests for comment. In a press conference in May after the publication of Mr. Landis's emails, which implicated Mr. Bruyneel in doping, Mr. Bruyneel said: "I absolutely deny everything he said."

The job of the eight riders Mr. Armstrong would select as his Tour de France "domestiques," or help riders, would be to shield him from head winds, insulate him from encroaching riders and fetch water bottles from team cars—anything they could to preserve his energy.

In May 2002, Mr. Landis said, Mr. Armstrong told him there was a chance he might be tapped to ride at the Tour. He offered to rent Mr. Landis an apartment in St. Moritz, the Swiss resort town where he was living during the cycling season.

Nearly every day for weeks the two men went on punishing rides in the mountains where, Mr. Landis recalled, he often had trouble keeping up. Mr. Armstrong's training adviser, an Italian doctor named Michele Ferrari, followed behind in an old station wagon stocked with food, water and warm clothes for the descents. At the top of a climb, Dr. Ferrari would pull over to analyze the wattage meters on their bikes that measured how much power they were putting into the pedals.

By June, Mr. Landis had shown great improvement. He finished second to Mr. Armstrong in the seven-day Critérium du Dauphiné Libéré, a warm-up race for the Tour de France. After the race, Mr. Landis said, he was packing to leave the hotel when Mr. Bruyneel, the team director, knocked on the door.

Mr. Landis said Mr. Bruyneel congratulated him and gave him the news he'd been hoping for—that he would likely be named to the nine-man Tour de France team.

According to Mr. Landis, Mr. Bruyneel told him that when he arrived back in St. Moritz, Mr. Armstrong would give him something to shorten his recovery time in the weeks leading up to the Tour. Mr. Landis said Mr. Bruyneel told him they were small patches that contained testosterone and that Mr. Landis should stick one on his stomach two out of every three nights before going to bed.

During this conversation, Mr. Landis said, Mr. Bruyneel also told him that before the Tour, Mr. Landis would have some blood extracted—blood that would then be put back in his body during the race. That process would boost his blood's ability to carry oxygen to his muscles.

Both testosterone patches and blood transfusions are banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency, which oversees drug testing in many international sports. If evidence of their use is found in the blood or urine of a cyclist, it usually results in a two-year suspension.

Mr. Landis said the conversation with Mr. Bruyneel didn't come as a surprise, and that he agreed without hesitation. He said he was motivated by the prospect of making more money as a racer, and was happy he was being introduced to doping by somebody he trusted.

That day, Mr. Landis boarded a helicopter with Mr. Armstrong for a flight back to St. Moritz. It was the first time Mr. Landis had been in a helicopter and he said he was awed by the view of the French Alps. "It was fun, man. Riding around with Lance was fun. We lived big."

When he arrived back in St. Moritz, Mr. Landis said, he went to a penthouse where Mr. Armstrong was living with his wife, Kristin, and his three children. While he was sitting at the kitchen table drinking espresso with Mr. Armstrong and his wife, Mr. Landis said, Mr. Armstrong handed him roughly 20 testosterone patches in silvery foil. According to Mr. Landis, Mr. Armstrong didn't say what the patches were.

Mr. Landis said he put them in his backpack. That night, he said, he put one on his stomach. It was the first time he had done anything that wasn't allowed under the rules of cycling, he said.

According to Mr. Landis, a few days later Dr. Ferrari, Mr. Armstrong's training adviser, asked him to lie down on a bed in Mr. Armstrong's St. Moritz apartment. He said Dr. Ferrari stuck a needle into his arm and extracted a half-liter of blood. Mr. Landis said the doctor told him blood would be transfused back into his body at the height of the Tour de France, when his body would be depleted of red blood cells.

A lawyer for Dr. Ferrari said he was unavailable for comment. In 2004, Dr. Ferrari was convicted by an Italian court of malpractice and sporting fraud for advising riders on the use of performance-enhancing drugs. Two years later, an appeals court threw out the verdict, acquitting him of malpractice and ruling that the statute of limitations had expired on the sporting-fraud conviction.

During their training rides in St. Moritz, Mr. Landis said, Mr. Armstrong explained the complicated logistics of transfusions, which involved carrying coolers with hidden blood bags across international borders. He said Mr. Armstrong told him that cyclists used to use erythropoietin, or EPO, a drug that controls red-blood-cell production, to enrich their blood during the Tour. But that substance was now detectable in tests, so riders had turned to transfusions.

In July 2002, with help from Mr. Landis, Mr. Armstrong won the Tour de France, claiming his fourth title, and the team rode with champagne through the streets of Paris. Mr. Landis, who said he'd received one transfusion during the Tour, collected a $40,000 bonus. His performance prompted the team to offer him a contract that would pay him over $200,000 a year for two years.

Less than nine months after having few prospects, and having considered selling his house to pay his bills, Mr. Landis was now an established rider with a bright future in the sport.

For the 2003 cycling season, Mr. Landis and many other American riders had rented apartments in Girona, Spain. Mr. Landis said blood that had been extracted from him, Mr. Armstrong and their teammate Mr. Hincapie was being stored in a refrigerator in the closet of Mr. Armstrong's Girona apartment. Before Mr. Armstrong left town, Mr. Landis said, he asked Mr. Landis to stay in the apartment and to monitor a digital thermometer to make sure the blood stayed at the optimal temperature just above freezing—around two degrees Celsius.

Mr. Hincapie did not respond to requests for comment. After Mr. Landis's emails, which described the blood storage, Mr. Hincapie, through a spokesman, denied the allegations.

The 2003 Tour de France proved a struggle for the U.S. Postal team. Mr. Landis, who had broken his hip in an accident in the off-season, wasn't as strong as he'd been the year before. Mr. Armstrong dueled for days with his main rival, the German Jan Ullrich, before securing what would become his fifth Tour victory.

For Mr. Landis, the race was the high point of his friendship with, and admiration for, Mr. Armstrong. "He's a fighter," Mr. Landis said. "He's a bad-ass bicycle racer. All the things I say about him, I don't in any way wish to take away from that."

By 2004, in his third full season with the team, Mr. Landis began to rival Mr. Armstrong in strength and fitness. He also began to get frustrated, he said, with the way the team revolved around Mr. Armstrong.

During an eight-day race in France in early March, Mr. Landis said, he was in position to win the sixth stage when his carbon-fiber bike frame snapped, nearly sending him over the handlebars. He said he complained to Mr. Bruyneel about not having access to newer bikes like the one Mr. Armstrong rode. Later, at a team gathering, he said, he groused: "There's a guy on the team that has a jet, and I can't get a bike?"—a reference to Mr. Armstrong's occasional use of a private jet.

By calling the team's equipment sponsors, Mr. Landis said, he was able to figure out that not all of the bicycle frames and equipment the team was given each year were going to the riders: About 60 bikes were not accounted for. He said he found out that some of the bikes were being sold for cash. Mr. Landis said Mr. Bruyneel told him that the money raised from the sales helped fund the team's doping program.

Federal investigators have contacted one of the team's sponsors, Trek Bicycle Corp., and asked about the sale of bikes, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Robert Burns, Trek's general counsel, said in an interview that the company was aware that bikes meant for U.S. Postal riders were being sold, but said it didn't know what the money was used for. "Occasionally, you'd see a bike on the Internet somewhere where it would surprise us," he said. "We didn't want to see that stuff getting sold on the market. It should be going to a better use than that." He declined to comment about whether Trek had been contacted by investigators.

According to some teammates, Mr. Landis began to grate on Mr. Armstrong and Mr. Bruyneel. "Landis is pushy," said David Clinger, a teammate on the 2002 U.S. Postal squad. Former teammate Benoit Joachim recalled that Mr. Landis had "no middle ground" emotionally. He was "either really, really funny and enjoying life, or aggressive and angry."

Later that season, Mr. Landis said, Mr. Bruyneel was giving a talk about team tactics before a race in France. When he got to Mr. Landis's role in the race, Mr. Armstrong wisecracked that Mr. Landis thought he was a world champion and deserved a jet. Mr. Landis said he shot back: "Not a jet, I want a bicycle. That's not too much to ask for."

After that exchange, Mr. Landis said, he didn't expect to be on the team much longer.

Using performance-enhancing drugs at the Tour de France is especially risky. There are frequent blood and urine tests on top riders. French police and customs agents are on the lookout for doping products, and have repeatedly confiscated them in raids. Journalists rummage through teams' garbage looking for incriminating evidence.

The transfusions in the hotel room near Saint-Léonard-de-Noblat weren't the only occasion during the 2004 Tour when some team members transfused blood, Mr. Landis said. The second time, he said, was an even stranger scene. After one day's stage, the team bus stopped on a remote alpine road. The driver opened the back of the bus to make it appear as though something was wrong, and set about pretending to fix it.

The bus had long benches on each side, and a couple of riders lay down on each one, Mr. Landis said. The doctors hooked them up, taping their blood bags to the sides of the bus, he said. Mr. Armstrong took his transfusion lying on the bus floor, he said. Mr. Landis said the process took about an hour.

At his press conference in May, Mr. Armstrong said: "What's gone on at U.S. Postal…and all of those Tours, we have nothing to hide." As for the specific allegations and claims, he said, "they are not even worth getting into."

During the 2004 Tour, Mr. Landis said, other cycling teams began courting him. Phonak Cycling Team, sponsored by a Swiss hearing-aid manufacturer, had approached him with a $500,000 contract, he said. U.S. Postal made a counteroffer, he said, but he rejected it and signed with Phonak.

Mr. Landis faced a number of challenges in the 2005 season. One of them was recovering from off-season hip surgery. Another, he said, was that his new team, Phonak, didn't have a doping program. He said he was never quite sure which doping methods worked or how a program was administered. But he said he didn't want to risk losing the edge doping might give him.

Organizing his own program, Mr. Landis said, was expensive and time-consuming. Much of the time he wasn't on the bike he was dealing with the logistics of his doping schedule and the transportation of blood and drugs. Mr. Landis said he teamed up with cyclists on other teams, such as fellow American Levi Leipheimer, on the logistics and transportation of blood. Mr. Leipheimer, who now rides for Mr. Armstrong's Radio Shack team, did not respond to messages seeking comment.

Mr. Landis said he hired a Spanish doctor in Valencia to take transfusions, and paid one person $10,000 to make two separate deliveries of half-liter bags of blood during the 2005 Tour de France. Each time, the person posed as a fan who wanted a jersey signed at the end of a stage. Mr. Landis signed it and the man handed him a nondescript package containing the blood, which Mr. Landis put in his jersey pocket, he explained. Mr. Landis said he transfused the blood himself.

Mr. Landis finished ninth in the 2005 Tour, more than 12 minutes behind Mr. Armstrong, who won his seventh title and then announced his retirement.

Before the 2006 season, Mr. Landis thought he had a good chance to win the Tour de France. That winter, Mr. Landis said, he sat down with Andy Rihs, owner of the Phonak team, and told him that to win the Tour he would need to carry out the same kind of blood doping he had done with U.S. Postal. Mr. Landis said Mr. Rihs supported the plan, and agreed to pay for Mr. Landis's program.

After Mr. Landis made that allegation in his emails, Mr. Rihs said in a statement: "Neither I nor the management of the team knew that Floyd Landis was doped." He denied that Mr. Landis informed him of any doping plan. A spokeswoman for Mr. Rihs said he declined to comment further.

Mr. Landis said money from Mr. Rihs allowed him to hire more people to handle logistics such as transporting blood.

On July 13, 2006, after stage 11 of the Tour, Mr. Landis's overall time was the fastest of any rider. For the first time in his career, he was awarded the yellow jersey that denotes the race leader.

Days later, Mr. Landis faltered badly. During the tour's 16th stage, he fell so far behind the Spaniard Oscar Pereiro that it looked as though he had no chance to win. The next day, however, Mr. Landis broke away from the pack in the mountains, leaving the Spaniard so far behind that he gained back nearly all of the lost time. He took back the yellow jersey in the final time trial against the clock and rolled into Paris with the overall win.

Then Mr. Landis's fortunes turned. Word leaked that a urine test after his miraculous mountain breakaway had revealed an abnormally high testosterone ratio. While another test still needed to be done, Mr. Landis's image had been badly damaged.

Mr. Landis said he had taken testosterone while training for the Tour. But, as he told officials for his Phonak team, he hadn't done so during the race. The next day, Mr. Landis said, team officials advised him to give a press conference to deny taking testosterone during the race. Mr. Landis flew to Spain, where a pair of Spanish lawyers had arranged what he thought was a meeting with a single reporter. Instead, he said, they ushered him into a giant press conference and handed him a statement that had been translated from Spanish. Mr. Landis tripped on the odd wording as he read the statement aloud. He said he realized immediately he had come off badly.

Minutes after the press conference ended, Mr. Landis said, he got a phone call. It was Mr. Armstrong.

Mr. Armstrong's message was simple, Mr. Landis said: If anyone asked if he had taken performance-enhancing drugs, he should respond "absolutely not," and stop talking. Mr. Landis said Mr. Armstrong advised him to get a lawyer and to not say anything else.

On the heels of the press conference, Mr. Landis said, Jonathan Vaughters, a former U.S. Postal rider, invited him to fly to New York and lie low for a while. There, Mr. Vaughters urged Mr. Landis to come clean—about everything he'd done.

Mr. Landis was conflicted. If he told the truth about taking blood transfusions, including the one he said he'd just taken during the Tour, he said he would have looked like a "lunatic" for giving that press conference. He said he was concerned the truth would not only jeopardize the careers of his friends and teammates, but might end his own.

At the same time, he felt wronged by the testing system. "I felt the punishment I received for what had happened was unfair, especially considering the magnitude of the problem and the people who were never punished."

By that fall, Mr. Landis had decided to appeal the drug test, he said, because he hadn't taken testosterone during the Tour. That, he believed, meant the whole testing protocol must have been scientifically unsound.

Pat McQuaid, president of the International Cycling Union, which usually oversees testing at the Tour, said Mr. Landis's subsequent appeals resulted in rulings that validated the testing protocol.

During a May 2007 arbitration hearing before the U.S. arm of the World Anti-Doping Agency, Mr. Landis repeatedly lied to a three-lawyer panel. He denied using testosterone or performance-enhancing substances while on the U.S. Postal team, and denied doping while on the Phonak team.

That September, Mr. Landis said, he was about to take a morning bike ride in Temecula, Calif., when his phone rang. His lawyer, Maurice Suh, told him the panel was about to make its decision. Mr. Landis said he went into the garage and cracked open a beer. "If there was ever a time to drink in the morning," he said, "that was it."

A couple of hours later, Mr. Suh told him he'd lost.

Mr. Landis said he walked upstairs to find his Tour de France trophy. With the iconic purple chalice in hand, he walked onto the balcony overlooking his driveway, hoisted the trophy over his head and threw it as hard as he could. It hit the pavement and shattered into hundreds of pieces.

In 2008, Mr. Landis appealed his case to the Court of Arbitration in Sport. He lost that appeal, too.

In February 2009, Mr. Landis came back to cycling after a two-year suspension. That same year, Mr. Armstrong also decided to return to the sport after a 3½-half-year retirement. Their experiences could not have been more different. Mr. Armstrong's team was invited to compete in the Tour de France, and he finished third.

Mr. Landis had a terrible showing at the 2009 Tour of California. Later, he fell off a ladder while painting his house and injured his leg. Mr. Landis said he began seeing a therapist—and discovered how liberating it was to tell the unvarnished truth about his career in cycling.

For the 2010 season, Mr. Landis joined the OUCH-Bahati Foundation cycling team, a lower-division club, and set his sights on the Tour of California, the biggest race the team could have participated in. But in March, Mr. Landis said, he found out his team would not be invited to take part. For Mr. Landis, it was the last straw. He decided to go public about cycling.

On a sunny, cool morning in late May, Mr. Landis sat on the deck of a small cabin in the San Jacinto Mountains southeast of Los Angeles, drinking coffee and eating an omelette. The cabin, which he bought in 2007, sits among pine trees near the end of a narrow, bumpy road wide enough for one car.

The living room, with its mismatched couches, looked somewhat bare—like a college student's first apartment. A Cannondale bike leaned against a window in the kitchen. On the refrigerator, there were nine stickers—U.S. Anti-Doping Agency notices of passed drug tests, all given since Mr. Landis's return to cycling.

Mr. Landis was about to go for a bike ride. He said he wasn't sure what he was going to do next. He had no races, nothing to compete for. He said he was planning to watch the Tour de France on television.
 
Report: Doping investigator may talk to Hincapie
http://www.statesman.com/sports/report-doping-investigator-may-talk-to-hincapie-795342.html

NEW YORK — The Wall Street Journal is reporting that American cyclist George Hincapie has been contacted by the lead investigator of a federal probe into doping in professional cycling.

In a story published Saturday, the Journal reports a person familiar with the matter says Hincapie is "likely" to agree to talk to lead investigator Jeff Novitzky when he returns to the United States after the Tour de France. Novitzky is a special agent with the Food and Drug Administration.

Zia F. Modabber, Hincapie's attorney, confirmed to the newspaper that he had spoken with Novitzky.

The federal doping investigation was spurred by allegations made by Floyd Landis. He said the use of banned substances was common on the US Postal team when he rode with seven-time Tour winner Lance Armstrong and Hincapie.
 
It is hard to believe that Novitzky is still leading the anti-steroid crusade for the government against what will presumably be Lance Armstrong after his disastrous role in the embarrassing and failed federal pursuit of Barry Bonds.
 
There may be substantial basis for Landis vs. Armstrong.

Cutting Edge Muscle Forums

Thanks I like Real Gains insight. I saved a lot of his posts from cycling forums where he posted similar commentary... however, cycling forums don't take kindly on truthful discussions of doping in their sport and he was inevitably banned there.
 
for those of you who could not read RG's response over in CEM.

It's only Lance that I have issues with, because he insists that he is clean and he has given cancer patients false hope by saying that he accomplished his goals clean and beat cancer too.
His whlole pure clean persona is sickening to me the current crop of pro's.

I don't give a shit if guys dope OBVIOUSLY...but I do take offense to what Lance has said over the years. He needs to shut the Fuck up. .

best to say no comment like Ullrich and Indurain than to make an ass of yourself by insisting you are clean and giving false hope to young clean talented riders and even cancer patient for fuck sakes.

This is only the beginning...you'll see....more of Lance's old team mates will be coming out...his dumping of Landis's 800cc blood refil down the toilet in front of Landis and the entire team was the straw that broke the camels back.


Here's a class act>>>>"Leave me in peace; everybody takes dope."
Jacques Anquetil 5 time TDF winner who had more natural talent in his baby finger than Lance has in his entire body.

RG
 
Here's a class act>>>>"Leave me in peace; everybody takes dope."
Jacques Anquetil 5 time TDF winner who had more natural talent in his baby finger than Lance has in his entire body.

RG

More about Jacques Anquetil and doping convictions from [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Anquetil"]Jacques Anquetil - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Anquetil_memorial_at_Quincampoix_02.jpg" class="image"><img alt="Anquetil memorial at Quincampoix 02.jpg" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Anquetil_memorial_at_Quincampoix_02.jpg/220px-Anquetil_memorial_at_Quincampoix_02.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@en/thumb/2/28/Anquetil_memorial_at_Quincampoix_02.jpg/220px-Anquetil_memorial_at_Quincampoix_02.jpg[/ame]:

Anquetil took a forthright and controversial stand on the use of performance-enhancing drugs. He never hid that he took drugs and in a debate with a government minister on French television said only a fool would imagine it was possible to ride Bordeaux-Paris on just water.

He and other cyclists had to ride through "the cold, through heatwaves, in the rain and in the mountains", and they had the right to treat themselves as they wished, he said in a television interview, before adding:

“ "Leave me in peace; everybody takes dope."[28] ”

There was implied acceptance of doping right to the top of the state: the president, Charles de Gaulle, said of Anquetil:

“ "Doping? What doping? Did he or did he not make them play the Marseillaise [the national anthem] abroad?"[29] ”

He won Liège-Bastogne-Liège in 1966. An official named Collard told him once he had got changed that there would be a drugs test. "Too late", Anquetil said. "If you can collect it from the soapy water there, go ahead. I'm a human being, not a fountain." Collard said he would return half an hour later; Anquetil said he would already have left for a dinner appointment 140 km away. Two days later the Belgian cycling federation disqualified Anquetil and fined him. Anquetil responded by calling urine tests "a threat to individual liberty" and engaged a lawyer. The case was never heard, the Belgians backed down and Anquetil became the winner.

Pierre Chany said:

"Jacques had the strength - for which he was always criticised - to say out loud what others would only whisper. So, when I asked him 'What have you taken?' he didn't drop his eyes before replying. He had the strength of conviction."[30]

Anquetil argued that professional riders were workers and had the same right to treat their pains as, say, a geography teacher. But the argument found less support as more riders were reported to have died or suffered health problems through drug-related incidents, including the death of the English rider, Tom Simpson, in the Tour de France of 1967.[8]

There was great support in the cyclist community, however, for the way Anquetil argued that, if there were to be rules and tests, the tests should be carried out consistently and with dignity. It was professional dignity, the right of a champion not to be ridiculed in front of his public, that he said led to his refusal to take a test in the centre of the Vigorelli track after breaking the world hour record.

The unrecognised time that Anquetil set that day was in any case quickly broken by the Belgian rider, Ferdi Bracke. Anquetil was hurt that the French government had never sent him a telegram of congratulations but sent one to Bracke, who wasn't French. It was a measure of the unacceptability of Anquetil's arguments, as was the way he was quietly dropped from future French teams.
 
Isn't anybody mad at the snitch. I mean everyone who is involved heavily with cycling HAS to know that it's going on. Just like BB. Just like the NFL, or any other ELITE athletic competition. AAS are involved. So, this guy get's popped and once lying over and over again doesn't work he resorts to the childish..."they started it!!"

What a joke. The guy milks the system for all it's worth, he went out and RECRUITED help from other riders when he switched teams, and then he turns around and stabs the guys who were helping him in the back.

And all to make money for a book. He can say what he wants about how "liberating" it is for him to tell the truth. If that was the case then he could have told the truth without mentioning names or specifics, he could have told the truth about what HE DID. Instead he's gotta go ruin it for everyone. What an ass.
 
Isn't anybody mad at the snitch. I mean everyone who is involved heavily with cycling HAS to know that it's going on. Just like BB. Just like the NFL, or any other ELITE athletic competition. AAS are involved. So, this guy get's popped and once lying over and over again doesn't work he resorts to the childish..."they started it!!"

What a joke. The guy milks the system for all it's worth, he went out and RECRUITED help from other riders when he switched teams, and then he turns around and stabs the guys who were helping him in the back.

And all to make money for a book. He can say what he wants about how "liberating" it is for him to tell the truth. If that was the case then he could have told the truth without mentioning names or specifics, he could have told the truth about what HE DID. Instead he's gotta go ruin it for everyone. What an ass.

I'll second that. Also, this guy admits to tinkering with one of the biggest sporting events in the world, and didn't do a day in jail or pay a fine! Think the cops would extend any of us that courtesy? I think not!
 
A Champion Against Cancer, Under Siege
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/sports/cycling/22armstrong.html?_r=1&hp

August 21, 2010

By BRUCE WEBER and JULIET MACUR

AUSTIN, Tex. — Barry Bonds. Marion Jones. Alex Rodriguez. Roger Clemens. There is no shortage of athletes who have fallen from grace, their achievements on the playing field and their public stature compromised by accusations of cheating or revelations of criminal or otherwise repugnant behavior.

The case of Lance Armstrong is far more complex. Having survived testicular cancer that metastasized to his lungs and his brain, Mr. Armstrong — who went on to win a record seven Tour de France titles — has become a powerful symbol of the possibilities of life after the disease. He has also become a world-class philanthropist, his Livestrong foundation doling out $31 million last year on behalf of cancer patients.

But now that he and his former team are subjects of a federal investigation into doping activities, those in the interdependent circles of his world are concerned that the inquiry will tarnish or erode all he has built.

“There are just so many unknowns at this point,” Doug Ulman, the chief executive of Livestrong and a cancer survivor, said in an interview at the foundation’s airy new headquarters here. “That’s the most frustrating thing.”

To Dr. John R. Seffrin, the chief executive of the American Cancer Society, the investigation should be irrelevant. Whatever Mr. Armstrong’s transgressions as an athlete, he said, they pale in comparison with the good he has done.

“Lance Armstrong has done more to destigmatize cancer than anyone,” Dr. Seffrin said.

Few would dispute that Mr. Armstrong is a splendid athlete, gifted and dedicated, or that he is a magnificent publicist for his cause. Since 2004, when Livestrong and its corporate partner Nikegave the world the yellow bracelet to signify that the wearer had been touched by cancer, more than 70 million have been distributed.

But his competitive side is also compelling. A power-wielding, polarizing figure in cycling, Mr. Armstrong, who turns 39 next month, has a reputation for being a brutal competitor and an aggressive self-promoter. A day after spending three weeks as his teammate at the 2009 Tour, the winner, Alberto Contador, who has supplanted Mr. Armstrong as the world’s best rider, said in Spanish: “He is a great rider and did a great Tour. Another thing is on a personal level, where I have never admired him and never will.”

Mr. Armstrong has long fended off suspicions that his Tour titles were tainted by his use of performance-enhancers, and he has never officially tested positive for any illegal substances. (At the 1999 Tour, he failed a test for a corticosteroid but produced a doctor’s note for it.)

Through one of his lawyers, Mr. Armstrong declined to be interviewed for this article.

During the Tour de France in July, he issued perhaps his most forceful statement on the issue: “As long as I live, I will deny it. There was absolutely no way I forced people, encouraged people, told people, helped people, facilitated. Absolutely not. One hundred percent.”

But Mr. Armstrong’s vehement claims of innocence amid the acknowledged widespread cheating in professional cycling strike many as far-fetched.

In cycling, he is also known as a control freak, an intense micromanager of his image and of the complicated apparatus that is a professional cycling team.

“He’s the most binary guy I’ve ever met,” said Bill Strickland, a cyclist and writer who has known Mr. Armstrong since 1994 and whose recent book “Tour de Lance” followed Mr. Armstrong as he prepared for the 2009 Tour after a three-year hiatus from the event. “He told me his motto is Win/lose, live/die. He equates winning with living and losing with dying. Every moment you’re around him, he wants to win. You can be in a conversation with him and he’ll try to get the upper hand. It never lets down.”

Cycling teams are built to focus on and nurture one star whom the other riders, known by the French word domestiques, support by protecting him from the wind, for instance, and ferrying water to him. And in his book, Mr. Strickland described a telling incident from the 2003 Tour.

Early in the race, Victor Hugo Peña, a domestique for Mr. Armstrong’s United States Postal Service team, briefly moved ahead of Mr. Armstrong in the standings and wore the yellow jersey signifying the overall leader. But Mr. Armstrong insisted that Mr. Peña continue to perform the chores of a domestique, a flagrant usurpation of Tour tradition, an embarrassment to Mr. Peña and a purposeful reminder of cycling’s social order.

“That was so typical of who he is,” Mr. Strickland said. “To those of us who saw that, it was criminal. And so perfectly Lance.”

At races, Mr. Armstrong is a titillating presence, always at the center of a throng. Fans, some living with cancer, gather several deep around his team bus, hoping to glimpse or touch him. “It’s like being at Lourdes,” Mr. Strickland said.

Some of what makes Mr. Armstrong’s character difficult to parse is the blinding sheen of his celebrity. Between his divorce from Kristin Richard, with whom he had three children, and his relationship with Anna Hansen, who is expecting their second child, his string of girlfriends included the singer Sheryl Crow, the actress Kate Hudson and the fashion designer Tory Burch.

“I just don’t see the whole ‘complicated’ thing,” said Ms. Burch, who has remained close to Mr. Armstrong. “He loves life. He’s a happy guy. He’s a great father; I’ve seen that firsthand. And I’m amazed by what he’s done for people with cancer — people I know and people I don’t.”

With 2.6 million followers on Twitter, Mr. Armstrong cultivates his fame, sharing personal activity reports, occasional shout-outs to cancer patients — “Pulling for Christopher Hitchens!” — and promos for Livestrong. A couple of weeks ago, Mr. Armstrong posted on Twitter that he would be leading a ride through the streets of Denver to promote a Colorado stage race in 2011. Two thousand riders showed up.

Some of this is certainly vanity — he sent a Twitter message about spending five hours with Bono talking about “Africa & Cancer & where the 2 meet” — but to be cynical about his cancer work would be unfair.

As chairman of Livestrong, he may no longer be involved in its day-to-day operation, but Mr. Ulman, its president, says that they speak each morning and that the organization relies on him not just as a spokesman, but also for relationship building and policy guidance.

Mr. Armstrong also served two three-year terms on the President’s Cancer Panel, which is charged with assessing the National Cancer Program. One of Livestrong’s newest ventures, a “navigation center” to help patients in Austin negotiate the health care system, is an idea Mr. Armstrong borrowed from the panel’s former chairman Dr. Harold P. Freeman, who founded the first such center, in Harlem.

“He came to see me at our center, which takes care of poor black and Hispanic people, many of whom have no health insurance,” Dr. Freeman said. “He showed a genuine interest in what I was trying to do and came back four different times. I see him as a compassionate person who cares about people who don’t have resources.”

Accusations Old and New

Not surprisingly, perhaps, Mr. Armstrong’s detractors in the cycling world are both legion and fearful, and the contentions of the few who have publicly spoken ill of him are well known. His critics include Floyd Landis, a former Postal Service teammate whose 2006 Tour title was annulled because he failed a drug test. Another former teammate, Frankie Andreu, said in a deposition for a civil lawsuit in 2005 that he and his wife visited Mr. Armstrong in the hospital during his cancer recovery in 1996 and heard Mr. Armstrong tell a doctor that he had used several performance-boosting drugs, including the endurance enhancer EPO. And Greg LeMond, who in 1986 became the first American to win the Tour de France, continues to assert that Mr. Armstrong cheated, although he acknowledges that he never saw Mr. Armstrong dope.

Mr. Andreu’s and Mr. LeMond’s accusations and the circumstantial case against Mr. Armstrong that the journalists David Walsh and Pierre Ballester laid out in their 2004 book, “L.A. Confidentiel,” are old enough to be stale.

But in May, Mr. Landis, reversing his years of denials, said publicly that he and Mr. Armstrong were active participants in systematic drug use and blood doping on the Postal Service team, which competed from 1999 to 2004. (According to a 2001 article in Texas Monthly, the Postal Service, a taxpayer-supported agency, paid Mr. Armstrong $8 million annually.)

Another former Postal Service rider confirmed to The New York Times recently that he used drugs himself and corroborated Mr. Landis’s statements that cheating was rampant on the team and that Mr. Armstrong encouraged it. The rider spoke on condition of anonymity because federal investigators told him not to speak publicly about the case.

Charges being considered in the investigation of the Postal Service team include fraud, drug distribution, tax evasion, money laundering and breaches of employment law, according to two people close to the investigation, who spoke on the condition they not be identified.

The lead investigator in the case, Jeff Novitzky, now a special agent for the Food and Drug Administration, is a formidable foe. Mr. Novitzky’s previous inquiry into drug use by athletes connected to the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative ensnared Mr. Bonds, who is facing trial next year on perjury charges relating to his 2003 grand jury testimony, and Ms. Jones, the Olympic sprint gold medalist, who went to prison partly for lying to investigators about her doping regimen. Novitzky also uncovered the first evidence against Mr. Clemens, who was indicted Thursday on charges that he lied before Congress about his use of performance-enhancing drugs.

None of Mr. Novitzky’s other targets, however, had Mr. Armstrong’s saintly aura among fans.

“His foundation has done so much for the public good, and there is no question that once the investigation turns into a prosecution, it’s going to tarnish the brand,” said William Moran, a New York lawyer who specializes in crisis management, adding that prosecutors should not risk moving forward unless they can win. “They need to have a slam-dunk here, because this is about more than Lance Armstrong.”

Thriving Foundation

Founded in 1997, two years before Mr. Armstrong’s first Tour title, Livestrong has defied the recession. According to the foundation’s 2009 annual report, revenue and earnings surpassed $50 million, by far its best year, coincident with Mr. Armstrong’s return to the Tour, where he finished a surprisingly strong third. (In this year’s Tour, which he said would be his last, he finished 23rd.)

Even after Mr. Landis’s accusations in May, Livestrong officials said, the foundation suffered no downturn in donations or in attracting volunteers. Business is proceeding as usual, Mr. Ulman, Livestrong’s president, said.

“We’re not naïve enough to think this couldn’t have an impact,” he said. “We just don’t know enough about what’s going to happen.”

Mr. Armstrong recently withdrew from the Leadville 100, a mountain bike race he won last year, saying he wanted to spend time with his children and was still smarting from a hip injury. This weekend he is in Philadelphia visiting cancer patients, courting top fund-raisers and, with about 5,000 others, riding in Sunday’s Livestrong Challenge, one of the foundation’s signature participatory events.

“I’d be devastated if, because of his situation, the foundation was hurt,” said Fayruz Benyousef, a consultant to nonprofit organizations, including Livestrong, whose father died of leukemia and whose own Hodgkin’s disease was diagnosed in 1988. “That would be a real sad day for everybody.”

So what are people to make of Lance Armstrong?

Jay Coakley, a sociologist and the author of “Sports in Society: Issues and Controversies,” said that he had no doubt that Mr. Armstrong was guilty of doping, but that it did not matter. For athletes, he said, the line between performance enhancement and medical treatment has become so fuzzy that it is impossible to discern.

“Deciding to use performance-enhancing substances and methods has nothing to do with lack of morality,” Mr. Coakley said. “It has to do with normative structure of elite sport, and the athlete’s commitment to his identity as an athlete.”

Not everyone in sports shares his view. But if Mr. Armstrong is found to have doped, then he will also be exposed as a liar. Playing out that hypothetical situation, Mr. Coakley said: “If he had told the truth, he’d be gone. How much money would he have raised for cancer?”

Whether charges will ever be brought against Mr. Armstrong or others associated with the Postal Service team is unknown, but the fallout from a long investigation could have implications well beyond cycling.

“Lance is an icon of hope and inspiration to millions and millions of people,” said Mark McKinnon, a business strategist and political media consultant who is also on Livestrong’s board. “So there’s a lot at stake.”
 
Back
Top