I prefer it over the 600mg/ml. It’s nice to only need to inject .5ml. It’s actually not terribly pippy. I pin it in my pecs pretty regularly.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Defiant Pharma (US Domestic)
- Thread starter Defiant Pharma
- Start date
RockyP
Member
I have tried a few different 600 / ml L-Carn, one that tested at 750. No PIP to speak of. I've heard of others with same or less concentration with horrible pip, so the way it's made seems to matter quite a bit.
I would be interested in a blend of L-Carn (at least 500 / ml) with those other aminos
I would be interested in a blend of L-Carn (at least 500 / ml) with those other aminos
Turkeybuilder
Member
My current carn tested at like 670/ml and 1ml gives me 0 problems
Infernalmango
Member
You made that or sourced it? Iv never seen it get made that thicc. You use it daily or pwo?
Sourced it. It’s been out of stock every time I’ve tried to order more though, so when I run out, I guess I’ll be back to 600mg/ml. I use it every day. I take it pre-cardio on non-training days.
Photon
Member
Fill up the syringe
throw the whole syringe in the baby wipe warmer
pin when warm
smooth even @ 700mg/ml
don't put the whole vial in, extended heat exposure makes it turn cloudy
I sit my vial on a mug warmer, used to do it daily, but I noticed that by the time I get halfway through the vial it started to turn a tren looking color, so now I warm it once to draw up pins for the entire week, then just warm 1 syringe daily.
Infernalmango
Member
Yeah I keep mine refrigerated during use. Although I took a month break from everything per surgeon orders, so I took my vial out and left it room temp for the month to see what happens (if you remember my first batch it turned a weird yellow very quickly, like within a week), but this vial is still crystal clear.
You brew yours as a mix of carn/glut 700/700? And the glut doesn’t make it oxidize super fast in the baby wipe warmer?
Photon
Member
250T/400Bold.
I ran a couple cycles at something like 200-300T/400-600Mast like 6-7 years ago. I didn't keep good notes on it unfortunately, but I recall it basically being side-effect free. I was using both E and P esters, I preferred E just cuz I preferred less frequent pinning.
Mast blocks estrogen activity in certain tissues (though its not considered a SERM? I've never quite understood the classification). Including in skin. Estrogen is really important for keeping your skin looking nice. So people who run a lot of high mast cycles tend to age quickly (Todd Lee being probably the most famous current example, of someone who takes a shitload of mast and looks like shit). Of course, not true for everybody. I look younger now than I did when I ran my mast cycles but that's because I actually take care of my skin and health now. Alcohol and smoking probably age you worse, and I quit both of those since I last ran mast. I still have some mast on hand, I'll probably run it again some day, but maybe just at low doses towards the end of a cut to look shredded for a few weeks rather than a primary compound to gain mass with.
Defiant Pharma
Subscriber
Good Monday fellas!
Got a few test results back today but just the finished oils samples I sent in. Still waiting on the raw test results.
Here are the 3 finished oils below.
Not sure what happened with the Deca300(MCT). My measurements were right on, I accounted for the 91% purity and did a 2% overdose. Over the years with Jano, it seems Deca is always a problem child, at least for me. I've had numerous Deca samples come back low even after taking purity and overdose % into account. Is there any possible explanation as to why this might happen? @janoshik
The EQ300 and Test P100 were pretty much spot on, so y'all know I'm not retarded.
Anyway, I guess I can just make my own labels for the Deca 270 and obviously discount it some from the normal price.
Got a few test results back today but just the finished oils samples I sent in. Still waiting on the raw test results.
Here are the 3 finished oils below.
Not sure what happened with the Deca300(MCT). My measurements were right on, I accounted for the 91% purity and did a 2% overdose. Over the years with Jano, it seems Deca is always a problem child, at least for me. I've had numerous Deca samples come back low even after taking purity and overdose % into account. Is there any possible explanation as to why this might happen? @janoshik
The EQ300 and Test P100 were pretty much spot on, so y'all know I'm not retarded.
Anyway, I guess I can just make my own labels for the Deca 270 and obviously discount it some from the normal price.
I wish I knew. We use same process and formula for raws/oils pretty much, so it can't be that.
My suspicion is it's less stable than we always assumed.
Inkniron87
Member
Is that eq about to be sold now that results are back?
Defiant Pharma
Subscriber
When you say "less stable" what exactly are you referring to brother?
Thanks for chiming in so quick btw.
Defiant Pharma
Subscriber
Yes sir, about to throw it on the list here in just a few minutes and update the pastebin.
The Deca and Test P will be going on there too.
Brewing process or storage of raw with already high impurities having negative effects on the raw is the only line of thought that makes sense at this point.
Defiant Pharma
Subscriber
Just updated the pastebin and adjusted the pricing for the Deca300(270mg/ml)
I think that's a pretty fair discount on the Deca.
I will update again when I get test results for the raws.
regards,
D.
I think that's a pretty fair discount on the Deca.
I will update again when I get test results for the raws.
regards,
D.
Defiant Pharma
Subscriber
Gotcha. Yeah, the brewing process and storage is the exact same as the other two samples sent in, so who the hell knows. The raws were also compounded within 2 weeks from when I sent the samples in so I wouldn't think they would degrade too much that quickly but who knows. Appreciate the input.
Similar threads
