Process? Are you referring to a basic TAMC/TYMC assay that Jano offers?
I don't have a process but have been pushing for improved standard for UGLs.
More info:
Some thoughts/suggestions for discussion after looking around here.
Realistic, overkill, get what you pay for, don't care?
Would like to hear members' thoughts, counterpoints, etc. especially on cost vs quality. The path to quality is known. Will people pay or too much for UGL customers?
=======
Every Source should provide with each shipment ...
1. 3rd party C of A on finished product batch specific to that shipment
- endotoxin screen
- metals with ICP
- purity(ies) / concentration(s) using hplc plus ms (or gcms)
2. C of A for bulk api for each batch (hplc plus ms or gcms)...
Hey guys, Its Dirthand... I am starting this Thread for
@readalot . This man has been going around this forum preaching this that an the other about his concerns and mission of heavy metals and crap in the gear that we use. I never really read much of the stuff he wrote but what i always noticed is that he always catch a lot of hell for. He always seem to take the criticism without resorting to low class retaliation of personal insults and so i kind of respected that. Anywho after his sabbatical (or whatever) he came back to the forum and seen that i had been making some gear and...
Database of vendors participating in the testing along along with tests performed:
Thread to track all of the great vendor / member activities in the enhanced testing arena. The
other thread covers only Projects 1 - 3 (demonstration); vendor/member activity can be found.
Slowly a surveillance database for raw AAS and GH quality/impurities can be built for additional testing (additional to API purity, HPLC, etc ). If nothing is found then that's a great result to track as well. The data will be available for those interested.
Scope:
1.
Hplc Purity
2. GCMS
3. Expanded metals list
4. Endotoxins
5. Residual solvents
6. Sterility