Survivalism
New Member
I’m curious where people here land on this, especially long-timers.
Do you get more enjoyment from:
1) The physical results
Size, strength, performance, physique, etc.
OR
2) The process itself
Cycle planning, managing sides, bloodwork interpretation, pinning frequency, and leveraging one compound’s mechanism to offset or amplify another.
Personally, I’m finding more appeal in the application and problem-solving side of things. The results are obviously welcome, but they’re not the only draw.
Not asking from a beginner standpoint or looking for advice — more interested in how perspectives shift after multiple cycles and years of use.
Do you get more enjoyment from:
1) The physical results
Size, strength, performance, physique, etc.
OR
2) The process itself
Cycle planning, managing sides, bloodwork interpretation, pinning frequency, and leveraging one compound’s mechanism to offset or amplify another.
Personally, I’m finding more appeal in the application and problem-solving side of things. The results are obviously welcome, but they’re not the only draw.
Not asking from a beginner standpoint or looking for advice — more interested in how perspectives shift after multiple cycles and years of use.
