Dure Pharma Duretest-E - HPLC/TAMC/TYMC - 2017-07 - SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com

Is the information why SIMEC had stopped providing raw data with their results available?

Thanks.
SIMEC had to spend too much time explaining and teaching people how to interpret the data so they didn't want it publicly available for download.
 
SIMEC had to spend too much time explaining and teaching people how to interpret the data so they decided not to make it publicly available for download.
Had anybody actually contacted them to explain raw data available at Anaboliclab?

It is quite a pity, as I am among the few people who are qualified to review those data and there have been huge blunders found in those data before.

Usually the companies strive towards increasing transparency as they establish themselves in the field.
 
Had anybody actually contacted them to explain raw data available at Anaboliclab?

It is quite a pity, as I am among the few people who are qualified to review those data and there have been huge blunders found in those data before.

Usually the companies strive towards increasing transparency as they establish themselves in the field.
SIMEC is already established. If you have found "blunders" then you should publish them.
 
SIMEC is already established. If you have found "blunders" then you should publish them.
Yes, I do realize that they are established. That's what makes it interesting.

I actually did post about the blunders several times.

It's indeed quite hard to weight a standard when you use less than 10th of what you ought to have used on that certain analytical scale.

Regarding their HGH testing I've talked about it more than necessary and there are years of data available.

Not gonna throw the dirt here. Just wondered how you view it.

So had anybody actually contacted them directly to explain raw data available at Anaboliclab?

Because if that's the excuse to not publish the data I guess they were under great strain from the many emails received and somehow something prevented them from simply replying with "that's not our job."
 
Yes, I do realize that they are established. That's what makes it interesting.

I actually did post about the blunders several times.

It's indeed quite hard to weight a standard when you use less than 10th of what you ought to have used on that certain analytical scale.

Regarding their HGH testing I've talked about it more than necessary and there are years of data available.

Not gonna throw the dirt here. Just wondered how you view it.

So had anybody actually contacted them directly to explain raw data available at Anaboliclab?

Because if that's the excuse to not publish the data I guess they were under great strain from the many emails received and somehow something prevented them from simply replying with "that's not our job."
I prefer full data as well but I understand the reasons SIMEC doesn't want it available for public download. My understanding is that a lot of people have contacted SIMEC about the Anaboliclab data. And nothing has prevented them from saying it wasn't their job to teach people how to read the data. That's exactly what they are doing.
 
I prefer full data as well but I understand the reasons SIMEC doesn't want it available for public download. My understanding is that a lot of people have contacted SIMEC about the Anaboliclab data. And nothing has prevented them from saying it wasn't their job to teach people how to read the data. That's exactly what they are doing.
Is it available for you, if I may ask?
 
Back
Top