Eq/test En Cycle Question

[maxpower]

If running 400mg EQ/wk, and 500mg TEST EN/wk, how long should i cycle for, and how soon into the cycle will i notice the effects?

 

[bigkb]

I would run a cycle like that for at least 12 weeks. With the test, you should begin to notice the effects around the 3rd or 4th week. EQ is slower, with the effects noticed around the 5th week or so. I'm speaking generally, as this can vary slightly.

KB

 

[Frankenstud]

depends on your age...8 weeks with hard training and good diet(4000-6000cal) will do you good....25-32 years old. forget 10+ weeks....it will kill your nat test supply. eating is EVERYTHING!!!

 

[Phreezer]

How old are you?

What are your goals for the cycle?

 

[bigkb]

depends on your age...8 weeks with hard training and good diet(4000-6000cal) will do you good....25-32 years old. forget 10+ weeks....it will kill your nat test supply. eating is EVERYTHING!!!

While it is true that eating is very important, I don't think that anyone can gain as much on a cycle that lasts only 8 weeks as they can on one that lasts 10 to 12 weeks or more, regardless of age. And as far as killing your natural test supply goes, that's something that just goes along with the territory when using steroids. Proper PCT should take care of that anyway.

I have always considered a steroid cycle as kind of an "investment". If you don't run it long enough, and put as much into it as possible, then you won't get as much out of it.

KB

 

[BigRanger]

While it is true that eating is very important, I don't think that anyone can gain as much on a cycle that lasts only 8 weeks as they can on one that lasts 10 to 12 weeks or more, regardless of age. And as far as killing your natural test supply goes, that's something that just goes along with the territory when using steroids. Proper PCT should take care of that anyway.

I have always considered a steroid cycle as kind of an "investment". If you don't run it long enough, and put as much into it as possible, then you won't get as much out of it.

KB

agreed with KB

 

[tonyatl]

eating is EVERYTHING!!!

so fucking true.....

 

[Achilles83]

Totally agree with KB, its a big investment, and with a compound like EQ, i would run it a minumum of 10-12 weeks, i prefer 15 weeks myself

 

[Deacon]

depends on your age...8 weeks with hard training and good diet(4000-6000cal) will do you good....25-32 years old. forget 10+ weeks....it will kill your nat test supply. eating is EVERYTHING!!!

this is inaccurate - EQ needs to be run 12 weeks min - I prefer 15 myself - and also while 400 mgs a week is a good starter most see better results at 600 mgs per week

run the test one week past the EQ before pct

 

[Silverback]

depends on your age...8 weeks with hard training and good diet(4000-6000cal) will do you good....25-32 years old. forget 10+ weeks....it will kill your nat test supply. eating is EVERYTHING!!!

8 weeks on eq is a waste of time!!! it should be run atleast 12 weeks --it is a slow gainer not a rapid builder

As far as 10+ weeks killing your nat test supply----Uhh somebody needs to do some research, your natural test will be shut down way before 8 or 10 weeks genius--TREN IS KICKING IN!!!!

but seriously listen to me and the other guys -- If you dont run the EQ for at least 10 weeks you will shrink!!!