Gay "marriage"

Bob Smith

New Member
10+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
What do you guys think of the whole gay marriage deal going on in San Fran today and the end of last week? It is in direct violation of CA law, yet the local judge chose not to block the marriage licenses.
 
Bob Smith said:
What do you guys think of the whole gay marriage deal going on in San Fran today and the end of last week? It is in direct violation of CA law, yet the local judge chose not to block the marriage licenses.

I don't know what's going on in San Fran and I also don't know what the US is coming to if gay marriage is going to be allowed, I think that lines need to be drawn, I don't beleive this country was founded to accept gay marriage nor do I beleive it is right.
 
A civil union is one thing I can accept, but the word marriage is meant for man+woman, I think it is wrong.
 
It is a crock of shit. Next thing we know there will be invitations to Louie and Hogg's "holy matrimony". That judge should be held in contempt. Look what they did to that southern judge that didn't want to remove the 10 commandments. Fucking faggots.
 
thick said:
It is a crock of shit. Next thing we know there will be invitations to Louie and Hogg's "holy matrimony". That judge should be held in contempt. Look what they did to that southern judge that didn't want to remove the 10 commandments. Fucking faggots.

LMAO....

But I do agree with the sentiment here... I do not support gay marriage.
 
Bob Smith said:
What do you guys think of the whole gay marriage deal going on in San Fran today and the end of last week? It is in direct violation of CA law, yet the local judge chose not to block the marriage licenses.

i think that they need mustard gas party poppers.thats a nasty,sickening thing and should not be allowed anywhere in the world.just wait,if the democrates win the election it will be legal in all 50 states.we will have prick and prats running all over hell and georgia,we has some stupid fucking people in the country.

maxx
 
Ok, Im not really looking for a commentary on the actual idea of gay marriage. Im talkin about the response from the judge and city of SF.
 
well next time clarify this ;) their decision is illegal. The judge has no more right to make a new law or decide not to enforce a law as we do. ANd san francisco needs to burn. Sorry but i had to add a little commentary on my feelings towards san fran. Fucking Big louie is a 9ers fan :confused:
Bob Smith said:
Ok, Im not really looking for a commentary on the actual idea of gay marriage. Im talkin about the response from the judge and city of SF.
 
Bob Smith said:
What do you guys think of the whole gay marriage deal going on in San Fran today and the end of last week? It is in direct violation of CA law, yet the local judge chose not to block the marriage licenses.

I'm all for gay marriage, just as long as it's a gay man and a lesbian who are getting married.
 
i thought the fight in mass was bad until i saw the line full of Neil & Bobs waiting to get married in SF on the news. they should accept civil union and free up our legislators' time for real issues. sad really.
 
Typical liberal nonsense. See what happens when you give a liberal power?



crewboss said:
i thought the fight in mass was bad until i saw the line full of Neil & Bobs waiting to get married in SF on the news. they should accept civil union and free up our legislators' time for real issues. sad really.
 
KTCKSports said:
Typical liberal nonsense. See what happens when you give a liberal power?


it's a big fucking mess, they need to sweep those picketers outta there before they get run the fuck over. fucking blow-hards, get a job. both strange and good to see speaker finneran and governor romney buddy up on this, i guess there's still a chance they could block it..
 
What happened to judges just interpretting the law instead of trying to make it? Particularly the 9th Circuit Court.
 
i think it's all going down in SF cause there's a huge gay community there so what better way for the mayor to get re-elected then let gays marry. i really dont see the big deal, other then useing the term marriage. they should just rename it to union or whatever, but it makes no differnece to me. "do what you will as long as you don't infringe upon the rights of others"
 
You know how you destroy a country you can't defeat militarily. You spent 40 years slowly destroying it from the inside, first you dumb down a generation ( school systems ) then you desrtoy the moral fabric( take god out of everything ) and now this. We'd better start making a stand before it's to late.......11
 
Bob Smith said:
Ok, Im not really looking for a commentary on the actual idea of gay marriage. Im talkin about the response from the judge and city of SF.

if its against CA. law, how are they getting married?is the judge just doing it to shut all the gay right liberals up?arnold needs to step in and do his fucking job!that judge should lose his bar card or what ever they have in that state.this isnt kickball,you cant just make up rules as you go.i havent seen anything on the suject personally,just know what you guys said about it.my thoughts are if its illegal then it cant happen or be a legal marriage.unless of course they have some loophole so that it can be legal in sf,but i dont know about legislation in cali.but i still think that queers shouldnt be able to get married,i dont give a shit where you are.after theyre married they will adopt a perfectly good straight kid and turn him/her queer also.where is our country going?

maxx
 
Back
Top