GE-TM E-Meth "Primo"

Musclemonster

New Member
So I started with a E-Meth only cycle, I injected 400 mg on monday and was planning on injecting 400 mg more today, but yesterday I went to get my blood work done in a lab.


Test 33 ng/ml 20 - 49 years : 2.18 - 9.06 (Range)

So I'm up in testosterone, I shouldn't since primo shouldn't raise your T levels, it should lower them a bit. So what is your opinions guys?

Fake? is it really Test blend?.
 
To the best of my knowledge Primo shouldn't raise test levels. As mentioned Primo is faked a lot and most of what is out ther is bunk. When faked you either get nothing, some test, Test/Deca or some other Test mixture.. Enjoy your test.
 
Primo is far and away the most faked steroid as is the most expensive steroid. Primo should also be dosed weekly at a bare minimum of 600mg even if it happens to be the finest primo known to civilization and even then really should be at 800mg/ew and should be run for a min 20 weeks, IMO, if not longer. You can see how all these factors lead to a costly relationship with the drug.
Real primo is a great drug. Hit it at 1200mg/ew and only positive things occur. No negative sides associated with primo no matter how high you run it. Just positive shit.
Scammers that want to do the best job at fooling customers into believing they are getting the real deal Holyfield will substitute EQ/bold in its stead. EQ also should be run for a relatively long cycle to see optimum results as does primo. EQ will give what could be seen or compared to results seen with primo.
Primo gains are said to be of a superior quality gains meaning no bloat and gains that are not lost after cessation of the drug. Both primo and eq are considered "mild" and both can be and are run year round.
 
Primo is far and away the most faked steroid as is the most expensive steroid. Primo should also be dosed weekly at a bare minimum of 600mg even if it happens to be the finest primo known to civilization and even then really should be at 800mg/ew and should be run for a min 20 weeks, IMO, if not longer. You can see how all these factors lead to a costly relationship with the drug.
Real primo is a great drug. Hit it at 1200mg/ew and only positive things occur. No negative sides associated with primo no matter how high you run it. Just positive shit.
Scammers that want to do the best job at fooling customers into believing they are getting the real deal Holyfield will substitute EQ/bold in its stead. EQ also should be run for a relatively long cycle to see optimum results as does primo. EQ will give what could be seen or compared to results seen with primo.
Primo gains are said to be of a superior quality gains meaning no bloat and gains that are not lost after cessation of the drug. Both primo and eq are considered "mild" and both can be and are run year round.

Exactly bro, if you wanna run primo you must run what BB says and it's not cheap at the dosage you need to make it worthwhile.
 
It's a shame when people pay Primo prices for Test in a bottle, unless your "In the know" and know what one is getting I would stay away from it.
 
Is there a reason GE TM has not responded to this. Have you contacted them via email or PM to see what's up?

I know plenty of UGL labs that get all powders from China and do not have the means to test the powder they are using. They trust there source to give them what they ordered. There has been plenty of UGL sources reselling what they think might be legit, but then turns out not to be. If they continue to sell that product then this is bullshit. If they take it off their shelves, to me they care about their product and the community.

I think this lab should speak up about what's going on and what their plan of action is going to be...

mands
 
I know plenty of UGL labs that get all powders from China and do not have the means to test the powder they are using. They trust there source to give them what they ordered. There has been plenty of UGL sources reselling what they think might be legit, but then turns out not to be.

They probably do have the means. It's just an inconvenient and expensive step. They could also test the products they produce. But probably don't. No quality control at any level. There are a lot of unknowns. Just a lot of trust going on. Of course, some UGLs may do testing. The bigger ones may outsource production to China where there may be some semblance of quality control. I don't know.
 
They probably do have the means. It's just an inconvenient and expensive step. They could also test the products they produce. But probably don't. No quality control at any level. There are a lot of unknowns. Just a lot of trust going on. Of course, some UGLs may do testing. The bigger ones may outsource production to China where there may be some semblance of quality control. I don't know.

You really think so Millard? I would think 80%(just a guess) of all the UGL's out there don't have a clue where or how to test their powder or finished product for purity or concentration. So, maybe the have the means but not a clue... lol I could be wrong.

You are absolutely right on the unknowns and quality control.

mands
 
You really think so Millard? I would think 80%(just a guess) of all the UGL's out there don't have a clue where or how to test their powder or finished product for purity or concentration. So, maybe the have the means but not a clue... lol I could be wrong.

You're probably right! And I thought safely setting up an illegal drug distribution enterprise was the hard part!
 
I didn't reply to the thread, Millard, but I was looking at the one you had about HG vs UGL.

IMO, if you had 100% legit HG or Vet gear, like the 90s, vs the same compound from a UGL, you would be nuts not to take the HG. It's not really even a question IMO. And I'm not saying there aren't some great UGLs out there either...
 
I didn't reply to the thread, Millard, but I was looking at the one you had about HG vs UGL.

IMO, if you had 100% legit HG or Vet gear, like the 90s, vs the same compound from a UGL, you would be nuts not to take the HG. It's not really even a question IMO. And I'm not saying there aren't some great UGLs out there either...

I agree. All things being equal, everyone would choose HG and there would be no UGLs. But I understand the marketplace's response to AAS prohibition. UGLs fill a need and satisfy the demand. AAS consumers just face a lot more risks and uncertainties under this scenario :-(

True, there are good and bad players in any business whether it's the legal market or the black market. It's just infinitely more difficult to identify the good guys in the latter. :(
 
Is there a reason GE TM has not responded to this. Have you contacted them via email or PM to see what's up?

I know plenty of UGL labs that get all powders from China and do not have the means to test the powder they are using. They trust there source to give them what they ordered. There has been plenty of UGL sources reselling what they think might be legit, but then turns out not to be. If they continue to sell that product then this is bullshit. If they take it off their shelves, to me they care about their product and the community.

I think this lab should speak up about what's going on and what their plan of action is going to be...

mands

Spot on, Mands!

Your view on this reminds me of what my dad always used to tell me as a kid. Everyone and anyone can make a mistake or do something wrong. That is not what defines that person. What defines that person is what they do and how they respond once they realize their mistake. This is what defines that person.

If GE TM has/had bad raws and produced bogus Primo, they wouldn't be the first to do so. But it is how they respond to this, and how they handle this that will determine their worth as a source.
 
This is what's frustrating about a lab like this. I received some Tren E from GE_TM a while back and a buddy of mine ran it and he swears it's by far the best Tren he has ever used. So, they make unreal tren and perhaps fake Primo? It's frustrating to say the least.

mands
 
Hello,

I am sorry that I am reacting late, after I ve promised on GE-TM Labs thread that I will post a facts a few days ago.

The main two reasons why I havent posted it yet, is that I am planning to post really convincing facts based on a completely verified informations and analysis, so that I could convince you that GE-TM products are absolutely trustworthy and containing the declared substances and the amount.

Second main reason is mine and customers safety.

I quote biggerben69:

(Let's get back to basics making sure everyone is being as safe as possible. Focusing on "as possible". Remember, this is illegal...all of it. From these guys brewing to(manufacturing) to payment(wire and mail fraud) There's a huge audience here and lots of money to be made.)

Once I ll make sure that these two reasons are resolved,I ll publish all the facts I ve promised.

Best regards David
 
We are talking about the primo and whether or not it is genuine, correct? If the guys from Get M need time to get the stuff tested or something that's understandable, I suppose. I hope it's something that is important. If not, I don't appreciate be quoted to help lend credibility to stall tactics.
 
I'm not one to defend sources but before this thread goes too far, it's worth noting the OP showed up at the same time as the other 2 getm complainers. He only has 4 posts, all regarding gtem's primo which he was suspicious of before he even started using it.

OP should post his lab results and any AAS use leading up to the primo cycle before any conclusions are drawn.

CBS
 
That response from David is pretty fucking lame. Best to deal with any issue head on, not side step or put off till tomm.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top