Gen-Shi Masteron 500 - GC-MS/MS - 2015-12 - performed by ChemTox via AnabolicLab.com

[AnabolicLab.com]

Gen-Shi Masteron 500 (drostanolone propionate) aka masteron was determined to have actual content of 123 mg/ml drostanolone propionate.

Steroid analytics courtesy of AnabolicLab.com: Gen-Shi Masteron 500 Lab Test Results - Anabolic Lab

View media item 671
View media item 672

 

[bickel29]

Impressive! So with this particular batch, for every 5ml vial you bought, you would basically have had 6ml worth of mast.

 

[mercury]

after so many years of bunk masteron all turns out to be not only 100% legit but overdosed even.

the powder production and distribution must be under new management in China

 

[Wunderpus]

My head is exploding! Everything we've been told is a lie!

 

[bickel29]

after so many years of bunk masteron all turns out to be not only 100% legit but overdosed even.

the powder production and distribution must be under new management in China

What are you talking about, Mercury? Have you looked at ALL of the results, thus far? Your claim above is not even close to being correct!

You are making the comment that "all turns out to be not only 100% legit but overdosed even" but that's not true AT ALL! Four results have comeback so far - 2 were overdosed, 2 were underdosed (one at 73% and the other at 83%).

Either you failed to look at all 4 test results, or you are failing to acknowledge all 4 results. Either way, you are misrepresenting the facts.

I may be wrong, so I'll ask the question - are you doubting these results? Reading your comment above, it seems to me that this is the case - but perhaps I am misinterpreting your comment above, thus my asking for clarification.

Thanks in advance for clarifying.

 

[Docd187123]

What are you talking about, Mercury? Have you looked at ALL of the results, thus far? Your claim above is not even close to being correct!

You are making the comment that "all turns out to be not only 100% legit but overdosed even" but that's not true AT ALL! Four results have comeback so far - 2 were overdosed, 2 were underdosed (one at 73% and the other at 83%).

Either you failed to look at all 4 test results, or you are failing to acknowledge all 4 results. Either way, you are misrepresenting the facts.

I may be wrong, so I'll ask the question - are you doubting these results? Reading your comment above, it seems to me that this is the case - but perhaps I am misinterpreting your comment above, thus my asking for clarification.

Thanks in advance for clarifying.

The clarification you're likely to receive is you being told to Labmax the gear lol

 

[rpbb]

What are you talking about, Mercury? Have you looked at ALL of the results, thus far? Your claim above is not even close to being correct!

You are making the comment that "all turns out to be not only 100% legit but overdosed even" but that's not true AT ALL! Four results have comeback so far - 2 were overdosed, 2 were underdosed (one at 73% and the other at 83%).

Either you failed to look at all 4 test results, or you are failing to acknowledge all 4 results. Either way, you are misrepresenting the facts.

I may be wrong, so I'll ask the question - are you doubting these results? Reading your comment above, it seems to me that this is the case - but perhaps I am misinterpreting your comment above, thus my asking for clarification.

Thanks in advance for clarifying.

I've always felt mercury doesn't like the program, because it takes away from labmax sales

 

[weighted chinup]

My head is exploding! Everything we've been told is a lie!

The mast results are surprising, but not that surprising. I was never fully convinced that real mast doesn't exist anymore or is hard to come by, I don't think any steroid hormone is that elusive. So far we're seeing results back from the big international UGL's, so it's not completely surprising. These results will certainly be impactful for consumers considering how many threads and posts I've seen asking about finding real mast and how much confusion there is over this particular hormone.

 

[manafest]

after so many years of bunk masteron all turns out to be not only 100% legit but overdosed even.

the powder production and distribution must be under new management in China

The method used in testing the masteron is actually accurate compareds to other sub par standards people been using over the years.

 

[Wunderpus]

The mast results are surprising, but not that surprising. I was never fully convinced that real mast doesn't exist anymore or is hard to come by, I don't think any steroid hormone is that elusive. So far we're seeing results back from the big international UGL's, so it's not completely surprising. These results will certainly be impactful for consumers considering how many threads and posts I've seen asking about finding real mast and how much confusion there is over this particular hormone.

I agree.

I imagine the conspiracy around masteron has been from two major issues-

1. Labmax- the labmax testing for Mast. sucks. Period.

2. Results- people probably expect way more out of mast, or don't know how to use it properly. Also, the only REAL sides from mast. are occasional hair loss and acne... Unlike tren, test, etc. where the sides can be an easy way for some users to confirm hormone is present.

 

[weighted chinup]

I agree.

I imagine the conspiracy around masteron has been from two major issues-

1. Labmax- the labmax testing for Mast. sucks. Period.

2. Results- people probably expect way more out of mast, or don't know how to use it properly. Also, the only REAL sides from mast. is occasional hair loss and acne... Unlike tren, test, etc. where the sides can be an easy way for some users to confirm hormone is present.

I would also include the kind of UGL's people have purchased mast from in the past. Whether or not they were established manufacturers, or start-up operations could play a role as well. The latter is usually the type that attempts to setup shop here and in the past, the labs that gained a brief 'foot-hold' in the underground before going down were generally the amateurs, with some exceptions. Thankfully that is more or less a thing of the past now in the underground...

 

[bickel29]

The clarification you're likely to receive is you being told to Labmax the gear lol

I've always felt mercury doesn't like the program, because it takes away from labmax sales

You both obviously know where I was going with this...

 

[Wunderpus]

I would also include the kind of UGL's people have purchased mast from in the past. Whether or not they were established manufacturers, or start-up operations could play a role as well. The latter is usually the type that attempts to setup shop here and in the past, the labs that gained a brief 'foot-hold' in the underground before going down were generally the amateurs, with some exceptions. Thankfully that is more or less a thing of the past now in the underground...

Agreed.

Mast., primo. and 'var have some mythical aura surrounding them. So far, based on AL's results, they are more common than people think.

 

[mercury]

What are you talking about, Mercury? Have you looked at ALL of the results, thus far? Your claim above is not even close to being correct!

all samples do contain masteron prop close to the specification, which is good enough for me. I've just placed order for 250 vials. I think it does not matter that the vial says 100 mg/ml but in fact it is 123 mg/ml, 10% off is within acceptable error.

so at this point I do not know what you are asking me to clarify.

 

[bickel29]

all samples do contain masteron prop close to the specification, which is good enough for me. I've just placed order for 250 vials. I think it does not matter that the vial says 100 mg/ml but in fact it is 123 mg/ml, 10% off is within acceptable error.

so at this point I do not know what you are asking me to clarify.

So you are considering any sample that contains any amount of Masteron to be 100% legit, even if the label claim is 100mg/ml and the actual content is only 73 mg/ml?

I am confused.

 

[mercury]

So you are considering any sample that contains any amount of Masteron to be 100% legit, even if the label claim is 100mg/ml and the actual content is only 73 mg/ml?

I am confused.

73 mg/ml is not total bunk, you just pin more. it is better than all the bunk masteron I have seen before.

but you have to understand how the test method works usually the error is within 10%

so they give you average which is 73 mg/ml but in fact it can be 10% higher or lower for the type of equipment they use. there is also human error how the sample was prepared it can give you another 10% error. there is also something like making up the test results by somebody who does not care in the lab. send to different lab and you will see different number.

the measure error for HPLC and GC is different, so you will get different results for the same sample. you can get very accurate results on ICP/MS but it is very expensive equipment and very few labs have it.

 

[bickel29]

Well, the good news is that, even with the limitations you have cited Mercury, that we ALL agree that this Anaboliclab.com testing in tremendously more reliable than those Labmax tests.

I mean, it's ridiculous when we have 3 different people seeing three different things from one picture of one test.

Right?

 

[mercury]

listen I am just tired talking about labmax (I like the kit I have been using it for w while)

lab test is $300

labmax test vial is $5 ( if you buy the whole test kit for $200 with 40 vials inside)

what the fuck do you expect to get detailed lab analysis for $5

it tells you if you have right hormone inside, this is what you get for $5

send sample to labmax and they will test it at their lab for $300 and you will get detailed report.

 

[bickel29]

Dude, why are you so angry?

 

[Docd187123]

Dude, why are you so angry?

The butthurt is strong with this one Bick.