GHK CU burns all day - even in a 50ml vial

[Proud Pangolin]

Some folks cant process this stuff well. My wife is also one of them. She gets a rash from it every time even at 1mg dose. Rash lasts about 2-3 days and she does say the area burns and is clearly inflamed. Same solution works fine for me and she is fine with other peptides and glp1s.

Another possibility is your BAC water. Too much alcohol will burn though not all day... not in my experience. I made some spicy BAC water in the past but its like a few minutes of burn at most.

Another is your compound is crap. Did you get it tested or are you relying on toilet paper COA by the seller? Those are worthless coming from a UGL. Literally worthless. You can assume they dont exist. Either test it or prepare for pain.

As for GHK-Cu, I did tons of research a month or two ago including reading the clinical trials. Most are trash. The only things I got out of them is surface level wound healing and collagen building (the two are not excluse per se). The latter has plenty of anecdotal account showing it works when microneedled. Not the same as injection but in theory, it should work within its half life.

The current reality is the peptide is overhyped thanks to influencers and retarded kiddie looksmaxers desperate for attention and sex, and it bled over to reddit where it hit less intelligent adultsand now people expect the moon. It absolutely will not remove wrinkles or scars. Not on its own. It cant do that because thats now how our skin works. To do those things you need to reset your collagen layer by damaging or melting it 1st. Then it can act as support at best. But without that, it wont do much which is what the trials showed. If you are older and have thin skin, it *might* help you a little to thicken it. This is beneficial but by how much? No idea. I wouldnt rely on it.

wait. What are people even expecting from it???

There are basically two reasons why you would use it:

1.You are already taking BPC-157,TB-500, maybe KPV and some GH/GHRH's for healing and you want to add something for healing: well GHK-CU would be a good addition. Even though i have to say, that simply taking more BPC-157 and TB-500 will result in a lot better results. However if you already taking a shit ton of those and considering the low price of GHK-CU why not add that.

2. You take it for your skin. Results are mixed though. And again, you will see real results if combined with other peptides as the other peptides are (pretty sure) the main driver.
The famous Glow or Klow stack.

Both BPC and TB-500 stimulate fibroblasts and collagen production, increase blood vessel growth, speed up skin cell migration and regeneration, reduce excessive inflammation. And the evidence is solid compared to GHK-CU

KPV: very effective at epithelial surfaces and gut (PepT1 uptake), good for barrier inflammation and dermatitis/IBD models.

KPV will there for many reduce a lot of acnea, bad skin, puffines.

So why even bother with GHK-CU?

Well because its pushed on social media obviously. But also, because its dirt cheap compared to thw other peptides

 

[thejumpingsheep]

wait. What are people even expecting from it???

You wouldnt believe the crap being peddled... skin tightening, scar removal, wrinkle removal, acne scar removal, and get this... one guy here actually said it cleared their "brain fog."

Im waiting for someone to claim its more anabolic than tren.

 

[mosmicatl]

You wouldnt believe the crap being peddled... skin tightening, scar removal, wrinkle removal, acne scar removal, and get this... one guy here actually said it cleared their "brain fog."

Im waiting for someone to claim its more anabolic than tren.

It will happen. People are idiots and want to believe regardless of what science and experience show. GHK-CU is such a farce. In the vein of reducing harm, you should be kicked off the forum for claiming it is effective.

 

[Proud Pangolin]

You wouldnt believe the crap being peddled... skin tightening, scar removal, wrinkle removal, acne scar removal, and get this... one guy here actually said it cleared their "brain fog."

Im waiting for someone to claim its more anabolic than tren.

its the same with Reta. Dont get me wrong GLP-1s are a revolution, however if you watch social media you get tge feeling reta is the cure for everything. Only yesterday i saw one claiming it cures cancer

 

[ostrichsak]

its the same with Reta. Dont get me wrong GLP-1s are a revolution, however if you watch social media you get tge feeling reta is the cure for everything. Only yesterday i saw one claiming it cures cancer

I haven't yet heard this claim but so far the early research on some if it's impacts have been pretty promising. Especially in areas of age-related cognitive decline such as Alzheimer's and dementia. When you consider the recent move to calling these types of ailments Type 3 diabetes because of their relation to glucagon commonality it's really not as much of a streatch to think that it could be impactful on some way since Reta's 3 (and strongest) agonist is a glucagon agonist.

Tirzepatide has been prescribed off-label for treating osteoarthritis with great success for quite a while now. I know people personally who were taking 1,600mg of Ibuprofin daily to keep their OA pain to around a 6 or so on the pain scale. Manageable. Those same folks take no NSAIDS now and their reported pain levels hover around a 2. One got off of them for surgery and the pain returned within a week or so as the steady-state levels in their body lowered.

Curing cancer? I don't know about that. That said, I'm not going to doubt the ability of any peptides until it's proven that they can't. We know that peptides tend to have a primary action but none of them do only that one thing due to the nature of how they work. Some of the other actions can be at a far more reduced role but if those benefits are silo'd out could actually be more impactful than the primary action. Imagine if they found a way to cure age-related cognitive decline using Retatrutide in a specific protocol. That may be as impactful or more than it's been for weight loss.

We're only just now getting into what these are capable of and the research is woefully underfunded since you technically can't patent a naturally occurring molecule. Don't you worry though, the deep pockets of big pharma are moving mountains as we speak to change that so they can. Once that happens we'll find out all of the best ways to deploy these to make us all juuuust healthy enough to keep paying them $10k per month to remain sick enough to need their help to live. /sarcasm

The irony is not lost on me at all how this community comes so hard against peptides sometimes when it was the exact same limited data & FUD for the use of steroids & then HGH only a few short decades ago. You'd think that exact journey would cause this community of all places to be a little more open minded to the potential of something not entirely FDA approved for how people are using them to become healthier versions of themselves. But, what do I know?

 

[johnjay06]

I haven't yet heard this claim but so far the early research on some if it's impacts have been pretty promising. Especially in areas of age-related cognitive decline such as Alzheimer's and dementia. When you consider the recent move to calling these types of ailments Type 3 diabetes because of their relation to glucagon commonality it's really not as much of a streatch to think that it could be impactful on some way since Reta's 3 (and strongest) agonist is a glucagon agonist.

Tirzepatide has been prescribed off-label for treating osteoarthritis with great success for quite a while now. I know people personally who were taking 1,600mg of Ibuprofin daily to keep their OA pain to around a 6 or so on the pain scale. Manageable. Those same folks take no NSAIDS now and their reported pain levels hover around a 2. One got off of them for surgery and the pain returned within a week or so as the steady-state levels in their body lowered.

Curing cancer? I don't know about that. That said, I'm not going to doubt the ability of any peptides until it's proven that they can't. We know that peptides tend to have a primary action but none of them do only that one thing due to the nature of how they work. Some of the other actions can be at a far more reduced role but if those benefits are silo'd out could actually be more impactful than the primary action. Imagine if they found a way to cure age-related cognitive decline using Retatrutide in a specific protocol. That may be as impactful or more than it's been for weight loss.

We're only just now getting into what these are capable of and the research is woefully underfunded since you technically can't patent a naturally occurring molecule. Don't you worry though, the deep pockets of big pharma are moving mountains as we speak to change that so they can. Once that happens we'll find out all of the best ways to deploy these to make us all juuuust healthy enough to keep paying them $10k per month to remain sick enough to need their help to live. /sarcasm

The irony is not lost on me at all how this community comes so hard against peptides sometimes when it was the exact same limited data & FUD for the use of steroids & then HGH only a few short decades ago. You'd think that exact journey would cause this community of all places to be a little more open minded to the potential of something not entirely FDA approved for how people are using them to become healthier versions of themselves. But, what do I know?

I agree 100%