H.g.h

[hockey1]

At 45 years old i tried gh last year along with other gear and it seemed to work.I found it good for the anti-aging effect on my skin and the extra shredded condition i was able to acheive with it.But even at my age and the desire to get bigger and what ever i think gh is a big waste of money.I was going to pick up 3 kits @ $400 each (Serostim) and then i thought about how much this shit cost and said screw it i'll buy extra gear from the best ug lab around,so i will have a great summer cycle.

 

[urbadside]

At 45 years old i tried gh last year along with other gear and it seemed to work.I found it good for the anti-aging effect on my skin and the extra shredded condition i was able to acheive with it.But even at my age and the desire to get bigger and what ever i think gh is a big waste of money.I was going to pick up 3 kits @ $400 each (Serostim) and then i thought about how much this shit cost and said screw it i'll buy extra gear from the best ug lab around,so i will have a great summer cycle.

You think GH is a waste of money....think again bro.....


Some of the benefits associated with GH supplementation include the reversal of common diseases associated with aging, improved brain activity and function, it strengthens connective tissue which reduces the probability of injury, incredible weight loss without any loss in lean mass, reduces wrinkles by rejuvenating the skin, it raises energy levels and brightens mood, promotes muscle growth, improves libido, improves functions of the lungs which increases the level of oxygen in the blood stream, provides immune system support and Thymus function, and probably the most impressive characteristic is, its ability to produce more muscle cells, something no steroid can do.

 

[hockey1]

Alot of the effects you claim are somtimes in the head more than in the system,Idid get some benefit from using it but for my money to benefit ratio as a bodybuilding issue it's not worth the money,better mood? who can prove that? I have done it and better mood can have nothing to do with G.H.

 

[Trenman]

Alot of the effects you claim are somtimes in the head more than in the system,Idid get some benefit from using it but for my money to benefit ratio as a bodybuilding issue it's not worth the money,better mood? who can prove that? I have done it and better mood can have nothing to do with G.H.

The problem with most people is that they don't use GH long enough. Like you for instance you probably bought one kit (was it even a 100IU) and used it a 2IU-4IU ed day right?

HGH is great when ran for a period of 3 months and longer. You were just starting to see the benifits of it when you stopped.

 

[biganth]

If you are getting GH at a good price then its worth using,but i wouldnt be using it if i was paying high $$ for it.I also agree with Trenman,at least 4iu ed for 12 - 16 weeks

 

[hockey1]

The problem with most people is that they don't use GH long enough. Like you for instance you probably bought one kit (was it even a 100IU) and used it a 2IU-4IU ed day right?

HGH is great when ran for a period of 3 months and longer. You were just starting to see the benifits of it when you stopped.

I did a 6 month cycle "trenman" and did use 6iu per day but i dont think it's worth the money,Im sorry if you sell it i just stated my opinion and i do know what im talking about but not as much as "trenman" I saw benefits also, again not worth the money,why do you have such issues with an opinion? Yours is no better than mine"trenman"

 

[hockey1]

By the way "trenman" lets see a photo of your great body,I will gladly post ONE FROM MY LAST SHOW.

 

[Trenman]

Let's measure our dicks while we are at it........... bro you didn't say one word about how long you used it or cycled it. I was making an assumption that it wasn't used correctly. It seems you did everything right and I'm very suprised you were not happy with your results.

#1 I don't sell it and never did.
#2 I don't compete or desire to.
#3 6'2" at 230 @ 9% is my best I've been
#4 I'm getting ready to try HGH after a buddy seemed to get great results. I'm teaming it with Test 750mg, Deca 600mg, EQ 200mg for 10 weeks and Abombs at 100mg for the first 25 days.(4th cycle at 27)
#5 I traded a bunch of gear for 2 100IU kits and still have to pick up 1 or 2 more.
#6 I'm going to bed.
#7 Don't take anything personal bro
#8 why "trenman" I am the all mighty trenman to you earthlings
#9 can't we all just get along
#10 are you tired of this yet and can we kiss and make up
#11 not literally kiss I ain't like that

 

[BEEFarmer]

Well here is my opinion on the subject-

****GH CAN be worth it to anybody and everybody (over 30)

1) hockey1 is right, GH is a WASTE of $$ if all you want to do is be a BB and get big, big BIG. Money is better spent on juice.

2) urbadside is also correct, it is an EXCELLENT product for the many health benefits it gives to older people. Even BB'ers who want to be the best they can be and can afford it.


You just have to ask yourself 1) Can I afford it? 2) Do I want to use GH soley for the mild BB effects it may have on me (since everyone is different), or do I want to use it to burn a little fat and all the other health benefits?

hmmm

its basicly a cost factor if you ask me.


If we could all afford it, we would probably all use it. But if $$ is tight (or all you want to do is grow muscles as quickly as possible) then stick with the juice.


thats that! LOL


now no more fighting or I will send you guys to your room!

 

[kemo]

Wow

HGH is probably one of the more controversial drugs on the BB side of the world. However, all of the stated claims do exist. Of all the drugs we have access to, HGH has the most scientific research conducted within the past 10 years. All of the scientific research still points to the same conclusiond: Used at 2-6 IUs per day for periods greater than 6 months will have all the benefits listed above.

Here is where I see the problem with most users of GH in the BB community: HGH is more of a subtle drug...similar to maybe a good dose of multi-vitamins (in noticeability of effects), not nowhere near the fast acting and highly noticeable AAS that we often compare it to.

Bottom line is this: If you are wanting to increase muscle size in a short period of time that is more susceptible to loss, then don't use HGH.

If you are wanting to add a little extra umph into your stack with something that helps increase the number of cells and therefore help you go beyond genetic limits while helping build muscle that is easier to hold, and you have some access to $$$$....use HGH. Bon't don't expect to notice a big gain unless you are already at your near your genetic limits and are an experienced AAS user.

If you are looking for a good health benefit, are not a heavy AAS user, and can afford to basically be "on" HGH for very long periods of time, then this truly is a wonder drug.

If you read closely, I think my post agrees with all the opinions on here, it is just we often judge HGH against different standards.

I hope this helps.....

Kemo

 

[Rotten_Dog]

HGH + IGF-1 + Insulin = $$$OUCH$$$

Lets not forget that most pro's use HGH with IGF-1 and insulin in a perfect combo to get the desired results. A lot of blood work and such go into this. BIG $$$

 

[RICKZILLA1]

Lets not forget that most pro's use HGH with IGF-1 and insulin in a perfect combo to get the desired results. A lot of blood work and such go into this. BIG $$$

I agree! I don't know if its a waste of money....I just don't have that kinda money to spend....If I did ,at 37 I'd jove to "waste some money". Since I don't TEST AND EQUIPOISE work fine for me!! Thank god for "P#" and "T#"

 

[urbadside]

I agree! I don't know if its a waste of money....I just don't have that kinda money to spend....If I did ,at 37 I'd jove to "waste some money". Since I don't TEST AND EQUIPOISE work fine for me!! Thank god for "P#" and "T#"

Hockey1

your a grumpy ass old man....

Have a nice day!