Okay, now we're getting somewhere. I understand what you're saying but allow me to provide an alternative perspective to consider. I'm going to quote your statements individually and respond to each.
"About the common theme on meso is talking shit about labs when you never tried there gear."
First, let me say that Meso is a different animal and like I mentioned, we have no mods or nannys telling us what to do. So, we rigorously vet sources here, especially ones that are unproven. I know its not a perfect system but there is a method to the madness and we are successful at weeding some out. It takes some people time to understand why we do what we do.
Now, I've made this argument before in this very thread but I will make it again: One does not have to try a source to have an opinion on the source - whether it be bashing, shit talking, concerned sentiments, or factually based comments on product, service, or character.
I'll even use the same analogy: Do you, ironball, have to first jump off the empire state building before you can have an opinion of what is likely to happen? It really is the same with sources - we can have negative or positive opinions about a source without trying it.
Another interesting question I would like you to answer candidly: Would you complain if we only made positive statements about sources?
"Refering to labs with good feeback and dudes complaining about lab results when they were posted and pretty decent."
Not sure what you're trying to say here but if I had to guess; you're saying that we complain about labs (UGL) with good feedback and complaining about lab results (blood work) even though the results were decent? If so, show me exactly what you mean by quoting the post and posting here.
Also, we never complain about blood work that is:
1. Done by someone with solid history here
2. Products were purchased anonymously and randomly
3. The blood testing protocol is well established and duplicated, meaning this member knows how his body responds to test and follows the same dosing/blood draw protocol as established one.
4. The results are not capped at 1500 if using enough test to surpass this number.
Also, Millard started Anabolic Labs as a harm reduction program that tests UGL products. In conjunction with this testing, we get to see how the products are dosed. I don't think many here complain about those results. Would you?
"But they want every lab ever created done."
Not sure what you mean here. Please explain.
"You run off good feedback and good testoserone results and you give it a shot, how can you say fuck this lab because the test you wanted wasnt posted."
I agree that the culture here at Meso does suppress source positive feedback and source positive blood work but that doesn't mean that's the reason they don't speak up or post it. Some members don't post positive feedback or blood-work on a source because they don't their feedback to be the reason someone buys. Why? Because sources can go south in a blink of an eye and they don't want to feel responsible for someone getting scammed or worse.
I'm not sure what you mean when you say, "how can you say fuck this lab because the test you wanted wasnt posted." Please be specific on what tests you're referring to.
Yes, things blew up but there is a reason. There were misunderstandings, a disagreement on who has the right to an opinion, the culture of Meso, and not to mention a few choice words thrown in for good measure lol