High deca/low test

have other variables changed that would determine gains on test and npp since you're last cycle? Doesn't make sense you'd make more gains on test alone and not on the same amount of test + deca.

If your Deca is legit my guess is that you are cutting your cycle too short as most experienced users say deca should be ran at least 16 weeks as it takes a long time to get into your system. Test + Deca should be Superior to just Test at the same dosage.
 
Never did a cycle to 16 weeks. If that is true about deca I'm not sure I am up for that length. Considering that npp sounds like the better choice for me for next time. 12 weeks was good though. Actually 12 plus the test prop about to start
 
NPP is awesome, it's in and out way way faster, the only downside is that it costs a lot more than deca.
 
Just to close this out. Finished out PCT described earlier and no signs of any sides. Strength and fitness gains were solid. On a clean diet I was up 13-15 lbs and retained 9-10 so far. That was not the primary goal. Strength gains and loss were noticeable and although I didn't notice joint relief from deca on cycle it was very noticeable once finished. Knees in particular. Only negative was high BP which is now back to normal range. Not sure if it was due to a switch from test e to test c. Test c was pharm and available at the time of planning. Test p toward the end of cycle was excellent. I think from now on i will open and close every cycle with it. 75-100mg 3x week was perfect for me.
 
Good job. I liked following this thread. Test P/NPP seem like a great way to start and end while the long esters buildup over time.
 
Back
Top