Hilma biocare Oxandrolone (lab test by janoshik)

[Goro]

Right? How is EVERYTHING he tests properly or over dosed. Come on...

Did you ever see source who posted bad lab results of his product?... no... that's why you see only good results Jano is ok... I sending same sample to Analizer ,Jano , Lab4Tox. All results was similarly

And another things.... why doing underdose ? Is now very easy access to raws and huge competition.... not like in 90'
.

 

[CompoundLifts31]

These tests results always bring back jano drama...

Question...can I have a list of what jano can/can't detect?
I have many raws from several sources
I mentioned in other thread. Maybe jano will test something free for someone. Send two samples with only a number on it. See what he comes back with. He should pick me lol... but I'd like to see anyone send samples without telling him what it is.
All my extra money goes to my health issues...I'm not paying for anything till I'm healed lol.

He needs to prove he's actually testing compounds somehow. I don't believe anything since the HGH deal.

 

[onslaughter]

He needs to prove he's actually testing compounds somehow. I don't believe anything since the HGH deal.

Then one of us needs to send him samples.
For free would be ideal...

Seeing how "bad he is" gets annoying...true or false, it's repetitive.

 

[janoshik]

Then one of us needs to send him samples.
For free would be ideal...

Seeing how "bad he is" gets annoying...true or false, it's repetitive.

A lot of "you" already sent the samples.
You are in a thread of such a guy.

Another well known member, @NandroXL who tried out multiple testing sources reviewed my services as well, just two posts above yours.

 

[Den84]

He needs to prove he's actually testing compounds somehow. I don't believe anything since the HGH deal.

This story are getting old..

 

[S.B.C]

actually I know of at least one that did just that

Because he's paid by sources to make up "99% pure" results.

When was the last time you saw a source say
'Dear customers
Our gear came back as only 70% pure
but don't worry, you're all entitled to a 30% discount'

 

[Den84]

actually I know of at least one that did just that

yes, surely your cousin, or a friend of your cousin. lol

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Did you ever see source who posted bad lab results of his product?... no... that's why you see only good results

Yes. One, actually. Steroaas, the guy that got hacked, then told everyone to prepare for police raids and such. He tested his own line of gear. His Test E (i believe it was) came back underdosed and he still posted the testing results.

 

[Klimmzugernie]

I use hilma from October 2017, I know very well that they are producing high quality products. I also saw a lot of laboratory tests on hilma. all always perfect. You can also find the primobolan hilma lab test, on the anaboliclab website promoted by this forum. results was 99.9 mg /ml of methenolone enantate.

these my lab tests on hilma, I did them only to check the constancy from year to year.

I have not found any hilma products tested on anaboliclab
Com

 

[MisterSuperGod]

I have not found any hilma products tested on anaboliclab
Com

Only one, it would appear.

Hilma Biocare Archives - Anabolic Lab

 

[CompoundLifts31]

I use hilma from October 2017, I know very well that they are producing high quality products. I also saw a lot of laboratory tests on hilma. all always perfect. You can also find the primobolan hilma lab test, on the anaboliclab website promoted by this forum. results was 99.9 mg /ml of methenolone enantate.

these my lab tests on hilma, I did them only to check the constancy from year to year.

I think Hilma is gtg. Wasn't disagreeing there. Janoshik seems to be trying to do the right thing. I just don't know. I'm glad you are happy with his services. I wasn't saying anything negative about you or your character.

 

[CompoundLifts31]

To @master.on defense Jano did post due to the amount of time it takes to detect and test that he will ask you to provide 3 substances it could be.

If I have time I will dig up his post.

I think that is what he is referring to.

I feel that info shouldn't be needed at all....
That's the whole point of the damn thing isn't it? Other than actual potentcy?

 

[janoshik]

I feel that info shouldn't be needed at all....
That's the whole point of the damn thing isn't it? Other than actual potentcy?

I requested that only at certain points in time when I was extremely busy with samples, because it saves time with preparation - standards can be prepared in advance. If the customer refused to provide that info, I either refused the job or told the customer to wait a few weeks if he's not comfortable with that.

I probably asked for it in 20-40 out of last 1000 samples and not once in recent months and I don't see anything wrong with that.

Hope that clears it up.

 

[Holidaypay]

I'm on the fuck jano train to but I don't give sources second chances but either way guys lets keep it in the jano thread an let this man post his result
@Den84 Thank you for posting test for us to see

Hey @janoshik eat a dick

 

[CompoundLifts31]

I requested that only at certain points in time when I was extremely busy with samples, because it saves time with preparation - standards can be prepared in advance. If the customer refused to provide that info, I either refused the job or told the customer to wait a few weeks if he's not comfortable with that.

I probably asked for it in 20-40 out of last 1000 samples and not once in recent months and I don't see anything wrong with that.

Hope that clears it up.

So if you know what sunstance you're testing for it must make it easier? Also, its probably cheaper to not test for all compounds vs a few, I'm assuming?
Did you ask strictly because the amount of business you were doing? Or was it more of a financial thing?
Thanks for your time!

 

[janoshik]

So if you know what sunstance you're testing for it must make it easier? Also, its probably cheaper to not test for all compounds vs a few, I'm assuming?
Did you ask strictly because the amount of business you were doing? Or was it more of a financial thing?
Thanks for your time!

If I know what is to be expected in the sample, then I can prepare a standard sample beforehand, saving me some time, as I can do that during the sample run.

If I have no idea what is being tested, then I have to for the sample analysis to finish first and only afterwards I can prepare the standard.

Doesn't have much point ever since I'm testing so many samples that I have to prepare them all for each batch and with the changes to operating protocol that I've made a while ago.

There is no financial difference. Hope I explained it comprehensibly enough.