Hilma - Oxandrolone Tested

Considering their oils came back contaminated I’d say this lab is shit...Inconsistencies between 2 pills also shows they’re not “pharma”

considering that no one user had got abscess and any kind of pip from hilma, and considering that simec was repeatedly forced to retract the reports due to sensational errors (recently with the report of test E balkan), I wouldn't take the fact of contamination too seriously. Also because reading all the threads in underground section it seems that hilma, is the lab that has the least complaints, about the pip.

regarding hilma oxandrolone I tested last year 2 different batch and the results showed that was little overdosed. It is all documented in this section.
 
considering that no one user had got abscess and any kind of pip from hilma, and considering that simec was repeatedly forced to retract the reports due to sensational errors (recently with the report of test E balkan), I wouldn't take the fact of contamination too seriously. Also because reading all the threads in underground section it seems that hilma, is the lab that has the least complaints, about the pip.

regarding hilma oxandrolone I tested last year 2 different batch and the results showed that was little overdosed. It is all documented in this section.
they retract reports due to compounds/dosages or due to being contaminated/non contaminated
 
they retract reports due to compounds/dosages or due to being contaminated/non contaminated
If these reports are posted on meso, how exactly is hilma able to retract them? If customers post results from having their products tested, hilma has no power to delete what is said. Or are you saying they pay for testing but only post the tests if it puts them in a positive light? I'd rather have gear that was a bit overdosed than under, but accurate is what inspires confidence. This latest test doesn't inspire confidence when there is that much of a discrepancy in the dosages that should be the same. Customers blind testing should carry more weight regardless. It's great when a source sends out what they offer for testing but obviously having customers able to send out blind samples is more valuable and helps to keep sources honest and on point. If they also had a recent test with gear showing contamination, I would steer clear of these guys personally.
 
If these reports are posted on meso, how exactly is hilma able to retract them? If customers post results from having their products tested, hilma has no power to delete what is said. Or are you saying they pay for testing but only post the tests if it puts them in a positive light? I'd rather have gear that was a bit overdosed than under, but accurate is what inspires confidence. This latest test doesn't inspire confidence when there is that much of a discrepancy in the dosages that should be the same. Customers blind testing should carry more weight regardless. It's great when a source sends out what they offer for testing but obviously having customers able to send out blind samples is more valuable and helps to keep sources honest and on point. If they also had a recent test with gear showing contamination, I would steer clear of these guys personally.
The tests are posted in the lab section and if I’m not mistaken there were 2 contaminated vials.
 
Back
Top