Home-made cycle?!

Ironhorse

New Member
10+ Year Member
I read this on another site and wondered if anyone here has ever tried this. Im not that desperate at this point, but still curious.


I've been a protagonist of ordering steroids in powder/oil for a while now. Problems with shipping amps and vials internationally make it near impossible to create good odds on it arriving without spending a fortune on the way of shipping. And the risks of using domestic sources make that an option I usually avoid as well. But many seem reluctant to go this way, because they feel they couldn't make their own injectable compounds. Yet this is quite easy.

What you need is either arachis or sesame oil, some benzyl alcohol, syringes and clean containers. Say you want to do a 10 week cycle of 500 mg per week test enanthate, so you order 5 grams of test enth powder. At 250 mg/ml that means 20 ml of gear. Take your syringe and fill your container with pure water, but keep track of the amount. When you have 20 ml in there, mark it. Empty the container. Calculate 3%, in this case 0.6 ml. Heat the oil to 100 degrees C or 212 degrees F. let it cool. Dump the powder in the container, then add oil to just below the 20 ml mark, Then use a syringe to add 0.6 ml of Benzyl alcohol and if its still below the 20 ml mark, add some more oil til you reach that mark. Shake it up real well, and voila : one cycle's worth of testosterone enanthate. Seem like a lot of trouble, but if you can guarantee delivery of the product its a much safer option than internationally shipping vials, or risk prosecution with domestic sources.
 
Sounds like the 1st recipe ever written for homebrew :eek: ... Homebrew is very easy .. any questions just ask ..
 
i saw that thread as well. there's a lot of good info on homebrewing out there. the var with everclear sounds cool. both fixes at once :)
 
I feel better being in control & knowing exactly what is gone into my vial...as long as I have been very careful and clean....if you can't get human grade, then hombrew is the way to go!
 
Sounds like a rudimentary protocol with questionable sterilization. I wouldn't be OK with not running my oil though a very fine filter.
 
Conciliator said:
Sounds like a rudimentary protocol with questionable sterilization. I wouldn't be OK with not running my oil though a very fine filter.

I agree. BA is bacteriostatic at the concentrations that are not corrosive or painful. Whatever bacteria, fungi, etc in the vial will not be killed, just kept from multiplying. Having said that, I prefiltered the oil I was going to use through a .45 and the final product was done through a .22. I now have a lot of test enanthate very cheap and I know exactly what is in it.
 
Conciliator said:
Sounds like a rudimentary protocol with questionable sterilization. I wouldn't be OK with not running my oil though a very fine filter.
.45 filters are fine enough
 
love_en said:
I agree. BA is bacteriostatic at the concentrations that are not corrosive or painful. Whatever bacteria, fungi, etc in the vial will not be killed, just kept from multiplying. Having said that, I prefiltered the oil I was going to use through a .45 and the final product was done through a .22. I now have a lot of test enanthate very cheap and I know exactly what is in it.
BA is actually Benzol Alcohol and even .5% is enough to kill bacteria to levels low enough to even read with most machines ... I use .2% and always go through a .45 with no problems .. I even use my gear the day i brew it but wait 7 days if worried .... .22 is a pain in the ass .. It's all good though ;)
 
MANWHORE said:
BA is actually Benzol Alcohol and even .5% is enough to kill bacteria to levels low enough to even read with most machines ... I use .2% and always go through a .45 with no problems .. I even use my gear the day i brew it but wait 7 days if worried .... .22 is a pain in the ass .. It's all good though ;)
I think he was just saying that BA is a bacteriostatic, which it is, not that BA is an acronym for "bacteriostatic".

Most seem to be of the opinion that BA will not kill bacteria, but that it merely inhibits their reproduction... hence the designation as a "bacteriostatic" and not a "bacteriocide". I remember Nandi talking about this a while back.
 
Conciliator said:
I think he was just saying that BA is a bacteriostatic, which it is, not that BA is an acronym for "bacteriostatic".

Most seem to be of the opinion that BA will not kill bacteria, but that it merely inhibits their reproduction... hence the designation as a "bacteriostatic" and not a "bacteriocide". I remember Nandi talking about this a while back.
Wel it's a fact that it will kill bacteria because a Pharm company tested it .. After 3 days bacteria was dropped very low and on 7th day bacteria was so low bacteria detection machines couldn't even pick any up .. How would a spore live in BA? I say it couldn't. Even at .1% which is what they used .. Infections are not very common at all ... the ones that happen, happen because of idiots rubbing pins on shit and still using them ... It's not that hard to brew a steril solution ..
 
MANWHORE said:
Wel it's a fact that it will kill bacteria because a Pharm company tested it .. After 3 days bacteria was dropped very low and on 7th day bacteria was so low bacteria detection machines couldn't even pick any up...
I haven't seen that. Do you have a link to it?
 
Conciliator said:
I haven't seen that. Do you have a link to it?
NO i learned this many years ago .. I forget what company did the experiment .. Just makes sense that bacteria can't live in BA ... No?
 
Back
Top