How much more powerful is testosterone than equipoise?

ruckin

Member
I'm having a hard time figuring out a good way to word this question, so I'll just ask in the form of an example. Say for example (I'm just making up arbitrary numbers here for the sake of my question) I would gain 10 lbs of lean muscle tissue on 1000 mg/week of test c throughout a cycle. If I were to use eq instead of test c, about how much eq would be needed to make equal gains to the test c cycle?

So in terms of muscle gains expected, how much eq would be needed to replace test and still build the same amount of muscle, assuming all other factors are equal?
 
I always hear the best aspects of EQ are the endurance and the hunger. If I were to run EQ it would be to see if it really increases hunger, because sometimes I just have a hard fucking time eating enough damn food.
 
After trt bloods next month I am blasting a gram of test and a gram of EQ with a few other ancillary and will blow the f up. I would much rather bulk with eq versus deca, besides I get veins like road maps from eq
 
I think eq is worthless :D

800mg eq = 250 test maybe?
I have to disagree. I think eq is one of the better compounds for me personally. I get awesome lean gains and good pure strength. Yes, it takes awhile to kick in, but the gains stick as long as you keep your diet and training up. I'd rather put on ten pounds of good vascular gains over 20 weeks than 15 lbs over 10 weeks and have my strength and size drop.
 
I think if anything you would get bigger faster, if you use test. You have to run eq longer to be as effective. I agree with the increased vascularity. Test gets me more water retention.
 
I think if anything you would get bigger faster, if you use test. You have to run eq longer to be as effective. I agree with the increased vascularity. Test gets me more water retention.
That's why I like running low test. The only time I run high test is when I've been off for awhile. Essentially, 500mg of Test is my bulking cycle. For leaning, I like 250 mgs with 500 mgs of Eq and blasts of tren.
 
I have to disagree. I think eq is one of the better compounds for me personally. I get awesome lean gains and good pure strength. Yes, it takes awhile to kick in, but the gains stick as long as you keep your diet and training up. I'd rather put on ten pounds of good vascular gains over 20 weeks than 15 lbs over 10 weeks and have my strength and size drop.
Running EQ only?
It's a personal opinion either way :)

Obviously I know that you ran something else too, replacement dose test @ 250mg and EQ only I will give you props. Otherwise I think it's the other compounds that helped you. That's what I would think.. In the post above you stated blast of tren, maybe king tren helped a lot? :)
 
Last edited:
EQ run by itself is pretty much worthless. You should always run it with test. EQ will give you quality gains that you will keep, but you need to run it at least 16 weeks. I run it pretty much year round.
 
After trt bloods next month I am blasting a gram of test and a gram of EQ with a few other ancillary and will blow the f up. I would much rather bulk with eq versus deca, besides I get veins like road maps from eq
What makes you prefer eq over deca? I would LOVE to try deca and/or npp but it could take 18 months to clear the system and I may have drug tests to pass in the next couple years :/

No way to answer that. It could vary greatly depending on your response to each drug.

Good point. I guess I was looking to get at least a ballpark figure though.

I have to disagree. I think eq is one of the better compounds for me personally. I get awesome lean gains and good pure strength. Yes, it takes awhile to kick in, but the gains stick as long as you keep your diet and training up. I'd rather put on ten pounds of good vascular gains over 20 weeks than 15 lbs over 10 weeks and have my strength and size drop.
I know you've always been a big lover of eq, aaron. You've certainly contributed to me wanting to try it so much. I don't particularly care about the increased vascularity and other aesthetic benefits of it, I'm more concerned with performance increases. Enhanced recovery, solid muscle (and concequently strength) gains, overall high levels of anabolic activity, etc.

I'm sure I'd make great gains with just high test, but the thought of replacing some of that test with eq to minimize sides while still making those gains is appealing to me.
 
EQ run by itself is pretty much worthless. You should always run it with test. EQ will give you quality gains that you will keep, but you need to run it at least 16 weeks. I run it pretty much year round.
You cruise on eq between blasts or something?
 
Back
Top