HYB Product Janoshik test result

[tweek]

Look

Any idea what yellow cap that was? As in was it a silver sticker h36 or white

 

[wexy1044]

Okay here guys.
USA stock
I have 36iu yellow cap. Paper package

 

[Dumbellsanonymous]

Okay here guys.
USA stock
I have 36iu yellow cap. Paper package

Yea I think they are full of shit she's has sent me same testing for the plastic case silver sticker.

Before I even ordered I asked for testing and they sent me testing for black caps making it seem they will be sending me blacks which had awesome coas then they pull the bullshit sending yellow I will never order from them again to much shit has been going on with them tbh.

 

[tweek]

Okay here guys.
USA stock
I have 36iu yellow cap. Paper package

Thanks for this.

I have the yellow cap but plastic package with silver h36 sticker so who knows if this is the same batch lol

 

[lipzz17]

Thanks for this.

I have the yellow cap but plastic package with silver h36 sticker so who knows if this is the same batch lol

Yura told me that it is the freight company who puts the stickers, but who knows

 

[wexy1044]

Thanks for this.

I have the yellow cap but plastic package with silver h36 sticker so who knows if this is the same batch lol

Who knows Any more these days bro lol

 

[Hitman]

Okay here guys.
USA stock
I have 36iu yellow cap. Paper package

I wouldn't put too much faith in that report , it looks fake and lacking many details.
I had a look as it was mentioned that someone in Australia tested it or an Australian lab had? If not the rest of below would still apply. *Credit to Complexity AI.

• There is no trace of any lab called Peptegrity/Peptegrity Analytics as a registered business or analytical facility in Australia (no ABN, website, address, phone, or accreditation details anywhere online), unlike real Aussie peptide labs such as Auspep or university mass‑spec cores that are easy to verify.
• The COA template is classic UGL style: one pretty chromatogram, a purity % to two decimals, and a vial photo, but no information on method, instrument, column, run conditions, impurity table, or who signed off the data, which is exactly what peptide‑testing guides warn about when they talk about vendor‑made COAs.
• A legit third‑party lab report will always give you a verifiable lab identity (physical address + contact), some kind of accreditation or at least method description, and a way to contact the lab directly; this one only points back to an anonymous email/QR that can be generated by the seller.

 

[Dumbellsanonymous]

I wouldn't put too much faith in that report , it looks fake and lacking many details.
I had a look as it was mentioned that someone in Australia tested it or an Australian lab had? If not the rest of below would still apply. *Credit to Complexity AI.

• There is no trace of any lab called Peptegrity/Peptegrity Analytics as a registered business or analytical facility in Australia (no ABN, website, address, phone, or accreditation details anywhere online), unlike real Aussie peptide labs such as Auspep or university mass‑spec cores that are easy to verify.
• The COA template is classic UGL style: one pretty chromatogram, a purity % to two decimals, and a vial photo, but no information on method, instrument, column, run conditions, impurity table, or who signed off the data, which is exactly what peptide‑testing guides warn about when they talk about vendor‑made COAs.
• A legit third‑party lab report will always give you a verifiable lab identity (physical address + contact), some kind of accreditation or at least method description, and a way to contact the lab directly; this one only points back to an anonymous email/QR that can be generated by the seller.

Yea and to have a jano report with such a large variance in purity makes no sense

 

[anabolic68]

Has anyone tested HYBs test e 250 and the Primobolan in the us warehouse?