MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
International HGH price comparison
- Thread starter MyNameIsJeff
- Start date
Like I said, I can admire the work you've put into this and at the same time recognize that new members will take this info as the QSC easy button.
Why does QSC even make it on the list with floaters present in the last 3 months on their finished oils? Yes this is a GH thread, but this spreadsheet promotes a vendor who has laughed in the face of basic MESO principles for years. Perhaps a column that identifies if vendor meets the most basic MESO QC? No floaters in last 3, 6 months? I don't know. You won't please everyone. I know that too well.
Happy Holidays Jeff.
Take care
Last edited:
I understand your point but I don't agree with SST here.
First of all this spreadsheet doesn't exonerate anyone on doing their own researches on the sources displayed there, second QSC HGH is excellent, that's a reality and I don't see why we should deny it just because their oils have been not up to standards until (maybe) now.
I have never seen an HGH test consistently as much as QSC and it keeps testing well and we keep sending new promo batches to test and it keeps coming back good. We will keep testing it as we should never trust any source and never fall for complacency.
Telling you the truth I see QSC doing better harm wise lately than many other sources that started well and went to shit instead GA cough cough?
QSC did the opposite, started bad and is improving. At their own pace? Sure but indeed improving..the new batches of oils SEEMS really up to a good standard, of course still to early to be sure so we will have to wait and see.
We need to be strict and severe but fair or than we are just following our emotions instead of facts.
Thanks for your feedback. Great concluding statement.
MyNameIsJeff
Member
- Updated risk assessment
- Updated promo availability
- Updated promo availability
MyNameIsJeff
Member
- Obtained new Janoshik test results from JY via email. No idea why they don't post those on their thread. Given these brand-new tests, and the recent activity and touchdowns reported in the thread, I reduced their risk score further to 'Medium'. The guy did doxx a customer via a tracking link, but at least he realized his mistake quickly and tried to fix it. The source risk primarily concerns the risk of not receiving the agreed upon products. That risk seems to have decreased, hence the change.
Wrangel7
Member
fantastic
MyNameIsJeff
Member
- Updated source risk (turns out readalot was right regarding the source risk of QSC 
).
- Added a column with an indicator of whether there are blind tests for the source's GH, and if it was a pass/fail. Please report here if you know of any other sources for which (blind) user tests of their GH are available. I will then incorporate that information and think about how to include it in the quality score.
).- Added a column with an indicator of whether there are blind tests for the source's GH, and if it was a pass/fail. Please report here if you know of any other sources for which (blind) user tests of their GH are available. I will then incorporate that information and think about how to include it in the quality score.
Delux
Member
Thanks for keeping this updated, I appreciate the work you put into it for the community
what does it means “hot packs”, “recent touchdown”?- Updated source risk (turns out readalot was right regarding the source risk of QSC
- Added a column with an indicator of whether there are blind tests for the source's GH, and if it was a pass/fail. Please report here if you know of any other sources for which (blind) user tests of their GH are available. I will then incorporate that information and think about how to include it in the quality score.View attachment 312612
sorry if the question is stupid for you, but im new in this threads
MyNameIsJeff
Member
Recent touchdown means a customer received a parcel with ordered goods in the past weeks.
Hot packs refers to an allegation that the source deliberately sent a package to a customer that stated on its label that it contained illegal goods. Essentially trying to get the customer in trouble with LE as revenge for a negative review.
Hot packs refers to an allegation that the source deliberately sent a package to a customer that stated on its label that it contained illegal goods. Essentially trying to get the customer in trouble with LE as revenge for a negative review.
thank you for your help!
after the silence of QSC im trying new sources like HYB and SSA,
HYB really good stuff,
SSA i recently ordered gh 10and 24
i will do a blind test, so i can help you with this spreadsheet
MyNameIsJeff
Member
- Updated Lobster EU pricing
- Added back Neogene as source of vials (guy needs to make up his mind)
- Increased FUYAO risk score due to one month MIA (told the guy)
- Extended strikethrough to risk score to improve readability
- Added light-blue shade to EU sources to improve readability
- Added back Neogene as source of vials (guy needs to make up his mind)
- Increased FUYAO risk score due to one month MIA (told the guy)
- Extended strikethrough to risk score to improve readability
- Added light-blue shade to EU sources to improve readability
Excel.exe
Member
for sry labs and under dimer column it says 0 instead of 0%. it is ruining my after work coffee.
Jeff why no SSA 24IU?
Wrangel7
Member
bump
MyNameIsJeff
Member
There is no lab test for that product.
MyNameIsJeff
Member
- Added another update to Lobster 50IU vial pricing
- Updated Neogene pricing
- Fixed serious formatting issues
- Updated Neogene pricing
- Fixed serious formatting issues
Last edited:
you haven't update JY blind test, we got one for 88% purity, until they provide new labtest and maybe pay for some more blindtest they should be ordered for that shit quality one imho
there is a new labtest for lobster 100IU
BigTomJ
Member
88% is absolutely unacceptable in todays market for UG GH
