Is my needle to big

I like 1.5" 26 Ga for pinning, and use a 20 Ga loading pin, Leur lock. I basically buy 20 Ga points and the 26 Ga syringe + points separately.

Since you want to always inject deep into the belly of the muscle and problems happen when you inject into the subcutaneous space or dermal layers with oils intended for deep i.m. injection, it's better to use the longer needle IMO, basically always.

Of course, body fat determines how deep you need to push.
 
I like 1.5" 26 Ga for pinning, and use a 20 Ga loading pin, Leur lock. I basically buy 20 Ga points and the 26 Ga syringe + points separately.

Since you want to always inject deep into the belly of the muscle and problems happen when you inject into the subcutaneous space or dermal layers with oils intended for deep i.m. injection, it's better to use the longer needle IMO, basically always.

Of course, body fat determines how deep you need to push.
Coring is bad if you draw with 20g
 
Never had rubber fall into my vials and Ive always used 18g.
Maybe stop using trash sources that use bottom of the barrel vials and stoppers.
Maybe you can't see it, are you stupid or what?

Read medical papers coring happened with 25g, moron
 
Peace out homeboy, I dont have time for people with poor attitudes
Hey, this is just one of the studies that were linked here (thanks @readalot)

"In this experiment, we found a coring rate of 10% when a 18-G needle without a filter was used for aspiration, independent of the needle diameter used for fluid ejection. Using a 23-G needle for aspiration led to a coring rate of 33%. Rubber particles in the injection fluid could be completely avoided by using a needle with 5 μm filter to withdraw the fluid from the vial.

Therefore, our first hypothesis, that coring may be reduced if a thinner needle is used for injection than for aspiration could not be confirmed. Using a needle with a 5 μm filter for fluid withdrawal eliminated vial coring completely, confirming the second hypothesis of this study.

The data of this study shows that the term “coring” is somewhat misleading. One would expect a particle of the size of the inner diameter of the needle. In fact, the inner diameter of the 18-G needle used in this study was 950 μm and that of the 23-G needle was 390 μm. The rubber particles created by the 18-G needle had a mean diameter of 77 μm with a maximum of 214 μm. Therefore, even the largest particles could easily pass the smaller diameter injection needle used for group two. The small size of the rubber particles is most likely caused by stretching of the rubber stopper when the needle is inserted and subsequent contraction of the resulting core.

Interestingly, using a thinner 23-G needle for aspiration resulted in a threefold coring rate. This result is in accordance with the available literature, as Asakura et al. found a coring rate of 73% in primary aspirations of insulin through a rubber stopper using a 31-G needle [22]. This data and our results suggest that thinner needles lead to higher coring rates."
 
Hey, this is just one of the studies that were linked here (thanks @readalot)

"In this experiment, we found a coring rate of 10% when a 18-G needle without a filter was used for aspiration, independent of the needle diameter used for fluid ejection. Using a 23-G needle for aspiration led to a coring rate of 33%. Rubber particles in the injection fluid could be completely avoided by using a needle with 5 μm filter to withdraw the fluid from the vial.

Therefore, our first hypothesis, that coring may be reduced if a thinner needle is used for injection than for aspiration could not be confirmed. Using a needle with a 5 μm filter for fluid withdrawal eliminated vial coring completely, confirming the second hypothesis of this study.

The data of this study shows that the term “coring” is somewhat misleading. One would expect a particle of the size of the inner diameter of the needle. In fact, the inner diameter of the 18-G needle used in this study was 950 μm and that of the 23-G needle was 390 μm. The rubber particles created by the 18-G needle had a mean diameter of 77 μm with a maximum of 214 μm. Therefore, even the largest particles could easily pass the smaller diameter injection needle used for group two. The small size of the rubber particles is most likely caused by stretching of the rubber stopper when the needle is inserted and subsequent contraction of the resulting core.

Interestingly, using a thinner 23-G needle for aspiration resulted in a threefold coring rate. This result is in accordance with the available literature, as Asakura et al. found a coring rate of 73% in primary aspirations of insulin through a rubber stopper using a 31-G needle [22]. This data and our results suggest that thinner needles lead to higher coring rates."

 
Even an unfiltered spike eliminates coring, pulls faster, and pays for itself by getting rid of the drawing needle. If you use the same needle to draw and inject, it keeps the needle perfectly sharp instead of being dulled by the stopper.
 
Even an unfiltered spike eliminates coring, pulls faster, and pays for itself by getting rid of the drawing needle. If you use the same needle to draw and inject, it keeps the needle perfectly sharp instead of being dulled by the stopper.
Spike don't last much at least the one I got the filter get melted by the BA and BB after maximum 6 draws on average. Filtered needle is where I'm going next. A lot easier and quicker to multidose too.
 
Spike don't last much at least the one I got the filter get melted by the BA and BB after maximum 6 draws on average. Filtered needle is where I'm going next. A lot easier and quicker to multidose too.

So, you think the advice about spikes should be revised, in favour of your approach, or not?
Is it just about durability + cost
 
Back
Top