Is this Bacteriostatic water any good for HGH?

Although it’s nothing crazy, it’s definitely not a $5 difference. More like a $40 difference
I was referring to single 30ml vials, which the most I’ve paid for is $15 (can find for $10-$12). Admittedly, that’s way more than it should be. But 30ml is enough to recon at least an entire kit, assuming 3ml per vial. I just price it into the overall cost of a kit.

For me, it’s not a lot to pay for one less variable that can create problems. But to each their own.
 
Cheapest source, $7 / 30ml vial when you buy a case


Single vial (not sure
if this is best deal)

Looks like Medex officially caved to the bullshit RX requirement. I have an email in to them I wrote as a reply to a previous order for a case of Hospira, but I doubt they'll play ball. Getting really tired of this kind of thing
 
not sure if I am allowed but a Very long time member on my other board starting making his own Bac water Made in the USA I can shoot a link to his online store if it is allowed..... 11$ for 30ml prolly the cheapest online too...
You can get hospira for that, people actually pay that for homebrewed bac water??
 
Looks like Medex officially caved to the bullshit RX requirement. I have an email in to them I wrote as a reply to a previous order for a case of Hospira, but I doubt they'll play ball. Getting really tired of this kind of thing
Well that's some BS considering they were just selling them without the license requirement even thought it was displayed. Guessing either they thought it was in place and just wasn't working, or they knew it wasn't even with it listed and something happened/changed. Sucks either way..
 
You can get hospira for that, people actually pay that for homebrewed bac water??
get on some of the source’s Discords or peptide forums and it seems pretty common. they don’t think twice on spending hundreds of dollars for their kits, but draw the line at paying $9 too much to mix the entire kit with.

luckily that BW alarm thread popped up prior to the recent gouging and license requirements. i think a lot of us were able to stock up…but i’d still seek out even the most expensive Hospira bottles if i had to.
 

Attachments

  • 55A464F0-B1A8-47E7-B6D6-EFF8D6E23862-5192-000001D977305525.webp
    55A464F0-B1A8-47E7-B6D6-EFF8D6E23862-5192-000001D977305525.webp
    59.8 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:
Well that's some BS considering they were just selling them without the license requirement even thought it was displayed. Guessing either they thought it was in place and just wasn't working, or they knew it wasn't even with it listed and something happened/changed. Sucks either way..
Yeah, they had the "medical license required" disclaimer on the listing for a while, but you could still add to cart and purchase, and they were shipping the product out consistently, without any medical license nonsense. This was well past the July date where things supposedly got more strict, and was true up until a day or two ago. I'm sitting in a decent amount, but I've got way more peptides stored than I can recon, and that irritates me now. Cheapest elsewhere is closer to 300 for a case, which is absurd, but I'll probably end up paying it before all sellers cave and leave us without a reliable means of purchasing it.
 
Yeah, they had the "medical license required" disclaimer on the listing for a while, but you could still add to cart and purchase, and they were shipping the product out consistently, without any medical license nonsense. This was well past the July date where things supposedly got more strict, and was true up until a day or two ago. I'm sitting in a decent amount, but I've got way more peptides stored than I can recon, and that irritates me now. Cheapest elsewhere is closer to 300 for a case, which is absurd, but I'll probably end up paying it before all sellers cave and leave us without a reliable means of purchasing it.

They always had the disclaimer.

I was told Pfizer was aware of the "diversion" of their product to unlicensed individuals and going to start enforcing the legal requirement on distributors that BAC could only be sold to rX authorized customers, and they did.

At the time I gave the heads up, it was still $89 / case.

 
They always had the disclaimer.

I was told Pfizer was aware of the "diversion" of their product to unlicensed individuals and going to start enforcing the legal requirement on distributors that BAC could only be sold to rX authorized customers, and they did.

At the time I gave the heads up, it was still $89 / case.

You warned of many of the then upcoming and now reality shortages/changes, and I followed all of your advice and am far better off because of it.

Looks like Medex is officially done. Anyone know if they actually verify the validity of medical licenses? Asking for a friend.... That or any Dr's want to help me out here? Lol
marine biologist.gif


Screenshot_20250912_093350_Gmail.webp
 
legal requirement
As I understand it, this is still vague enough to be a gray area. Bacteriostatic water is not mentioned specifically in the Durham-Humphrey Amendment of 1951, and since it it not a controlled or scheduled substance, and it is neither a prescription drug nor an over the counter drug, its inclusion under the amendment is considered a regulatory stance and not technically a legal one. And even if applicable, the requirement that it be "labeled and sold as Rx only" leaves it even more vague so that compliance from a vendor to see proof of prescription from the customer is largely voluntary on their part. Pfizer can pressure the vendor by threatening not to supply it (and other Pfizer products), but there is no other legitimate enforcement.

Which is why we see some vendors get incredibly anal about it, and some dgaf.
 
Have you reconstituted rHGH with it?

I've heard mixed reports (works/doesn't work), but I've seen a rHGH legit pharma product that comes with NaCL BAC, which make me think it should be ok.
Never had any problems with it.
More people have bad BAC and get lumps of infection, or painfull injectspot
Slightly swolen for some days. Ones they use pharma grade they are fine.

(more sorts of petides)
 
As I understand it, this is still vague enough to be a gray area. Bacteriostatic water is not mentioned specifically in the Durham-Humphrey Amendment of 1951, and since it it not a controlled or scheduled substance, and it is neither a prescription drug nor an over the counter drug, its inclusion under the amendment is considered a regulatory stance and not technically a legal one. And even if applicable, the requirement that it be "labeled and sold as Rx only" leaves it even more vague so that compliance from a vendor to see proof of prescription from the customer is largely voluntary on their part. Pfizer can pressure the vendor by threatening not to supply it (and other Pfizer products), but there is no other legitimate enforcement.

Which is why we see some vendors get incredibly anal about it, and some dgaf.

FDA approval designates a product as "rX Only" or "Over the Counter".

Hospira BAC is FDA approved and clearly marked rX Only on the bottle.

It's illegal under federal law to dispense rX Only without a prescription. That's why they took that off syringes when states wanted to make them available for harm reduction.
 
No Idea Idk GIF by Muppet Wiki
 
Back
Top