Janoshik Accuracy Worries Address

Their internal report is completely useless and ought to be ignored.
yes i didnt mention their internal report at all because its always 98-99%

but its not even a %. its just gcms or gc_lc which their report states.

dosent look like hplc at all ive said it many times! it literally says area % xd

thank you for taking time answering my question

1768133632124.webp
 
Keep in mind ProM is a pay to play board. He doesn’t give two shits for testing. When multiple blind tests on his paying sources came back bad, of course he’s going to have them deleted and do what he did over there. He loses money if sources can’t pay their fees.

There’s a reason you don’t see those sources anywhere else unless they can pay to sponsor, and another reason you don’t see any testing from them, except maybe 2.
New board rules, users aren't even allowed to post tests there anymore.
 
That’s pretty piss poor tbh. People are paying your company and expect accurate results. Is it that hard to have these guys trained properly to avoid mistakes?

Seems you grew too fast and employed folk who don’t have a clue and you just shrug your shoulders and wave it off.

I guess Big A on ProM was right about you/your company…
There is no such thing as never making mistakes. However you can choose to address them as he is doing here.
 
sorry to off track this but i hope you can remember this odd sample i sent in. If you look the hplc result was HIGHER than the actual content in the gcms result
gcms area dosent equal hplc percentage.

jano has good accurcary on raws in hplc. although the hitrate can be 90% or so, or smaller amounts of impurities can co elude in the 10% he misses. from my personal experience comparing gcms and hplc test results and then determining jano vs analiza.

analiza will always count all impurities as the main molecule. idk if they even test it or just getting bunch of money for throwing numbers out but yeah defiently not calibrated for raws.

double testing or just regurlar testing at jano is fine, you get so many right tests you can define a good pattern.
 
Back
Top