Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

[powdered_toast_man]

BB is a good solvent, whatever crap you have is probably going to be dissolved in the finished oil. It does not "choose" whats good for you..lol

Seems you are correct. Which sucks lol. But correct nonetheless.

 

[janoshik]

90% purity raws and 60% purity raws can both achieve the same amount of concentration required in the oils as its usually quite low 200-250mg/ml. One will probably pip more and have random sides than the other.

Whats a good test to determine if the oil is "pure" or full of impurities?

GCMS?

It might, but also it could be a pain in the arse to go through all the peaks there.

But I think GCMS might be the one eyed king here.

 

[janoshik]

All the finished oils testing shows is the mg/ml of the finished product.
It could be made out of raws that test at poor purity levels.

unfortunately yes

 

[powdered_toast_man]

It might, but also it could be a pain in the arse to go through all the peaks there.

But I think GCMS might be the one eyed king here.

Seems we all really need it right now, sincethere's still finished oils being pushed. The vendors might have a small supply of good raws they use themselves to brew finished oils, but we don't know without the testing.

 

[Photon]

Seems we all really need it right now, sincethere's still finished oils being pushed. The vendors might have a small supply of good raws they use themselves to brew finished oils, but we don't know without the testing.

Jano does offer it but i think GCMS addon costs more than testing the mg/ml itself. Basically the cost of testing goes up by more than 2x. Most UGLs do not even test their raws and even if they did, they do not publish them. No UGL is going to double their testing cost for GCMS.

I don't believe any UGL has promised that high quality % raws are used either. If you want it tested..I'm afraid you need to pay for it.

 

[powdered_toast_man]

Jano does offer it but i think GCMS addon costs more than testing the mg/ml itself. Basically the cost of testing goes up by more than 2x. Most UGLs do not even test their raws and even if they did, they do not publish them. No UGL is going to double their testing cost for GCMS.

I don't believe any UGL has promised that high quality % raws are used either. If you want it tested..I'm afraid you need to pay for it.

I didn't mean to imply that we shouldn't pay for it. It should indeed have a cost. I was simply talking to Jano, and the board.

To the point about UGLs... is that what everyone here expects - that sometimes their oils might be brewed from <50% raws?

 

[birdland]

Are these problems happen with all compounds?

 

[Ghoul]

Are these problems happen with all compounds?

Not the ones you make yourself after testing the raws.

 

[janoshik]

What a day!

Guys, as usual - NEVER believe edited reports.

If someone says they worry about their privacy, we can ALWAYS change the client name from personal email to "Anonymous."

 

[MuscularMD]

It might, but also it could be a pain in the arse to go through all the peaks there.

But I think GCMS might be the one eyed king here.

Makes me wish I added GCMS to the AAS samples I sent.

 

[Ghoul]

Makes me wish I added GCMS to the AAS samples I sent.

You still can if it's not complete.

 

[MuscularMD]

You still can if it's not complete.

I emailed @janoshik. But I don’t think there’s enough sample to do ID, mass, and GCMS. I only sent one cc.

 

[Ghoul]

I emailed @janoshik. But I don’t think there’s enough sample to do ID, mass, and GCMS. I only sent one cc.

Not sure what the requirements are. Hopefully you'll get lucky. I think GCMS encompasses the other two.

 

[MuscularMD]

Not sure what the requirements are. Hopefully you'll get lucky. I think GCMS encompasses the other two.

I was able to add GCMS. They did provide the results of ID and mass:

M

Post in thread 'DEVON ONE STOP SHOP - US DOMESTIC'

Apr 9, 2025

Got my @janoshik results for @DevonPharmacy test cyp 250 mg.

This was a bit of a science experiment since I'm new to UGL testosterone.

Sample A was crashed, Sample B wasn't. Before sending to Janoshik, I heated both vials and swirled them around until Sample A dissolved back in solution. I then transferred them to the Janoshik approved container using clean syringes and needles for each. I did this because there was a few posts here questioning whether crashed T was ok or not.

There's questions of test raw being bad lately. I have GCMS cooking with Sample B and...

• MuscularMD

• 
• 

 

[themanhart]

@janoshik
Hello sir,

Have you done any tests on UG lab Vaxinas?

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

Janoshik LABS please explain your error. The damage to our reputation has been severe. The spectrum shows that the purity of the product is 99.48%. Why do you mark it as 0

 

[Ghoul]

Janoshik LABS please explain your error. The damage to our reputation has been severe. The spectrum shows that the purity of the product is 99.48%. Why do you mark it as 0

Were they both supposed to be Tirz?

They're showing two different results. One Reta, one Tirz.

Good purity on both, but different products.

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

Were they both supposed to be Tirz?

They're showing two different results. One Reta, one Tirz.

Good purity on both, but different products.

Both are tirzepatide

 

[MuscularMD]

Were they both supposed to be Tirz?

They're showing two different results. One Reta, one Tirz.

Good purity on both, but different products.

Packaging mixup? Frightening if so.

Janoshik Analytical

 

[Sampei]

Packaging mixup? Frightening if so.

Janoshik Analytical

I don't think so... I mean looking at their internal testing they don't even have a retatrutide R15 with red cap.

Maybe just an honest mistake of Jano?