Klow blend and cancer

glutesforthesloots

New Member
10+ Year Member
So was planning on running ghkcu. Have some tendonitis in my elbow so figured id try the klow blend at 50/10/10/10. Planned on running it for 8 weeks. I'm second guessing it now and worried about the bpc and tb cancer scares. In a firefighter so around cancer causing things all the time. Would two months of it be a real big impact. I know it only increases cells if you have cancer already but thinking I should maybe just run the ghkcu solo to be safe?
 
KPV, BPC 157, TB500, and GHKCU all promote angiogenesis, and will fertilize any existing cancer cells.
Do you recall where you read that KPV is angiogenic? My understanding is that it's most broadly understood as indirectly anti-angiogenic, and almost certainly suppressive of inflammatory angiogenesis in the context of the gut.
 
I'm very bearish on the long term safety of all of these peptides. I used BPC and TB very briefly, then just tossed everything. I get better healing from GH anyway.
 
I'm very bearish on the long term safety of all of these peptides. I used BPC and TB very briefly, then just tossed everything. I get better healing from GH anyway.
I’m actually the same way. I tossed my klow mix and just sticking with reta, hgh, and trt plus deca
 
I’m actually the same way. I tossed my klow mix and just sticking with reta, hgh, and trt plus deca
More than enough right there. I just tossed some NPP into my course. Forgot how well nandrolone agrees with me. Fills me out faster than anything and I’m in a deficit.
 
Do you recall where you read that KPV is angiogenic? My understanding is that it's most broadly understood as indirectly anti-angiogenic, and almost certainly suppressive of inflammatory angiogenesis in the context of the gut.
You're right, I got it flipped for KPV
 
Dr Todd Lee's view on cancer accelerant PEDs (angiogenesis promoting or cellular growth promoting like GH/GH secretagogues) is that you're just going to find it sooner if you do have dormant cancer.
 
Dr Todd Lee's view on cancer accelerant PEDs (angiogenesis promoting or cellular growth promoting like GH/GH secretagogues) is that you're just going to find it sooner if you do have dormant cancer.
Hate to say it but he’s right. Increasing angiogenesis and / or increasing IGF-1 is going to make a cancerous cell like grow that much faster.
 
I'm very bearish on the long term safety of all of these peptides. I used BPC and TB very briefly, then just tossed everything. I get better healing from GH anyway.
I heal like a mutant with hgh and klow, yes cancer concerns but there also existing with hgh. As well as others I just noticed you list. More or less ALOT of the stuff were using to edge physique gains has the potential to proliferate that growth. Pick your poison and use wisely. Harm reduction has a whole lot more info on hgh and test then everything in klow or other peptides or how were using it.

coming from a man on atm
hgh, reta, klow, deca, test, mast, then selank and adamax occasionally

forgot mots-c & ss-31 I cycle in and out upon needs
 
Last edited:
Dr Todd Lee's view on cancer accelerant PEDs (angiogenesis promoting or cellular growth promoting like GH/GH secretagogues) is that you're just going to find it sooner if you do have dormant cancer.
We just had the galleri test done at work and came back negative so was thinking now is a good time to try some but now I'm not sure haha. You guys are scaring me
 
So was planning on running ghkcu. Have some tendonitis in my elbow so figured id try the klow blend at 50/10/10/10. Planned on running it for 8 weeks. I'm second guessing it now and worried about the bpc and tb cancer scares. In a firefighter so around cancer causing things all the time. Would two months of it be a real big impact. I know it only increases cells if you have cancer already but thinking I should maybe just run the ghkcu solo to be safe?
So you're worried about the angiogenesis effect which Cancer cells can hijack. Why don't you get checked out for cancer first for peace of mind? Tumor markers, etc. that would be the bigger problem here
 
So you're worried about the angiogenesis effect which Cancer cells can hijack. Why don't you get checked out for cancer first for peace of mind? Tumor markers, etc. that would be the bigger problem here
We get checked via the galleri test at work every two years. Just got my results from that and came back negative
 
Like I always say, I know a lot about nothing usually, but I do read. From what I gather, just like GH there’s been no direct link with these drugs and cancer. These are theories that haven’t been proven. GH is probably THE MOST studied peptide out there and there isn’t a direct link for it causing or promoting tumor growth as well. With the current research available, I would assume GH would likely cause or increase tumor growth before the others. Also- there are some that say these other drugs can have a cancer/tumor inhibiting effect as well. Again, I’m absolutely positively not an expert, I just hate to see bad information spread of off one study. It’s that kind of thinking that has kept TRT/HRT out of women’s hands for decades. One bad study, that doctors still cling to, that keeps them from prescribing these meds for women. We now know this was all BS and the women that are being treated by someone that knows their shit are having much better quality of life outcomes. My wife included.

Food for thought…
 
Back
Top