Klow blend and cancer

So was planning on running ghkcu. Have some tendonitis in my elbow so figured id try the klow blend at 50/10/10/10. Planned on running it for 8 weeks. I'm second guessing it now and worried about the bpc and tb cancer scares. In a firefighter so around cancer causing things all the time. Would two months of it be a real big impact. I know it only increases cells if you have cancer already but thinking I should maybe just run the ghkcu solo to be safe?
lol they don’t cause cancer smh
 
The broscience belief that it caused cancer might have been debunked but the very mechanisms that make these peptides beneficial are cancer accelerants. But so are many other things that we do in daily life
 
Anything that leads to or accelerates cell growth is a potential issue. This entire lifestyle will feed cancer growth. If you have a family history of cancer or are just paranoid then give up this lifestyle. Removing one factor like avoiding angiogenesis promoting agents isn't going to prevent cancer growth if you have it.
 
So was planning on running ghkcu. Have some tendonitis in my elbow so figured id try the klow blend at 50/10/10/10. Planned on running it for 8 weeks. I'm second guessing it now and worried about the bpc and tb cancer scares. In a firefighter so around cancer causing things all the time. Would two months of it be a real big impact. I know it only increases cells if you have cancer already but thinking I should maybe just run the ghkcu solo to be safe?
My Pop was a firefighter in NYC, so I understand your fears. Have you ever had blood tests for cancer, you can order those for specific multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests (Galleri, Cancerguard) or specific cancer markers (colon, colorectal)?

Before beginning KLOW or GLOW Protocol,
Request a "Firefighter Physical": When seeing your doctor, specify you need an NFPA 1582/1583 physical. Most standard "annual checkups" do not include the specialized blood work or urinalysis needed for early detection of occupational cancers.

You've got rights, depending on which state you're working in, these cancer pre-screenings should alleviate some of your concerns.

National Firefighter Registry for Cancer
 
My Pop was a firefighter in NYC, so I understand your fears. Have you ever had blood tests for cancer, you can order those for specific multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests (Galleri, Cancerguard) or specific cancer markers (colon, colorectal)?

Before beginning KLOW or GLOW Protocol,
Request a "Firefighter Physical": When seeing your doctor, specify you need an NFPA 1582/1583 physical. Most standard "annual checkups" do not include the specialized blood work or urinalysis needed for early detection of occupational cancers.

You've got rights, depending on which state you're working in, these cancer pre-screenings should alleviate some of your concerns.

National Firefighter Registry for Cancer
Solid stuff dude!
 
So you're worried about the angiogenesis effect which Cancer cells can hijack. Why don't you get checked out for cancer first for peace of mind? Tumor markers, etc. that would be the bigger problem here
Can we please stop treating indiscriminate tumor marker testing as a good or even remotely meaningful screening tool? It is not. End of story. Tumor marker testing is not suitable as a screening instrument. The sensitivity and specificity of serum tumor markers are so poor that they are not appropriate for this purpose. Currently, tumor markers are primarily used for monitoring disease course in oncological patients, meaning patients who have already been diagnosed.

Regarding the Galleri test, I would like to refer to this publication (Chatanaka MK, Diamandis EP. Implosion of Grail's Galleri Cancer Screening Test? EJIFCC. 2025 Feb 28;36(1):7–8. PMID: 40061064; PMCID: PMC11886625) and in particular quote this passage:

“A recent prospective clinical trial using the Galleri Multi-Cancer Detection Test was temporarily put on hold, likely due to poor clinical performance (details were not made public).”
In any case, I am not fully up to date on the Galleri test, as it is not my field of expertise. As far as I know, the PATHFINDER-2 study is still ongoing until 2028. At this point, no definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding specificity, sensitivity, PPV, or NPV. Given that tumor markers have so far proven unsuitable as screening tools in most cases, I would remain rather cautious and not overly enthusiastic for now.

And don’t get me wrong, there are meaningful and effective cancer screening methods, and those should of course be used.
 
Back
Top