Kurt Havens : Test Cypionate vs Enanthate Case Report

Kurt has been saying for years that Enanthate is superior. He just wanted to have a research that showed that.

I prefer Test Prop over anything, unfortunately the highest concentration is 200mg. I'm sure I could do a case report just like this one to prove that Test prop is superior to any other ester as long as it was n=1
If we are to make conclusions simply on a n=1 study, I will toss my experience to contribute and contradict. On 128mg test c my total test is 1300, and free test is 30. My results are significantly more responsive than the subject on test e or c.

This study is disappointing, I was expecting better especially after all the hype he was giving to it.
 
If we are to make conclusions simply on a n=1 study, I will toss my experience to contribute and contradict. On 128mg test c my total test is 1300, and free test is 30. My results are significantly more responsive than the subject on test e or c.

This study is disappointing, I was expecting better especially after all the hype he was giving to it.
And I bet you were not running Primo with it. Comes to show how badly this case report was done and how individual it can be.
 
How exactly does primo make this case study any different? He used the same dose of primo with both testosterone esthers. If he used different primo doses, then yes it would muddy the data. However, the same dose was used both times.

Because aromatisation matters and is one of the most important distinctions between these esters.

This study is trash and rightfully belongs in the bin.
 
So in the world of hormones we know how much variability there is user to user and he chose to run this study with 1 subject and then went on all these podcasts and shit to talk about how cypionate is a useless ester.
Same dude who says aromasin just… doesn’t work? Odd claim
 
Back
Top