L.R. who has actually had a Visit!?

micro said:
Unless they purchased there products with a credit card through pay-pay. Then that would be 2 things with your name on it.

I know of a source from awhile back that was contacted by pay-pal and asked what kind of business he was running. He told them he was supplying a service (booklet) for nutritional help. He contacted all his clients and told them what to say when pay-pal contacted them. I was never contacted but he told me some of his clients were.

I have been contacted by pay-pal when I paid a source with it. They asked what I bought. I told them none of there business. Nothing ever came of it.
 
I got some liquid clen from them right before all this happened and it's not working. I started out 125mcg two days and nothing so I jumped up to 140mcg. I still get nothing last two days I went up to 200 and still no shakes no temp rise. Anyone els had similar problems or what?
 
Sack....Law enforcement should not be interacting (golf) with known felons........they have an image to uphold......HAHAHAHA
 
.


Maybe some credible bro's might now want to talk about what is happening with LR on an open message board?

.
 
MassiveMike_576 said:
I got some liquid clen from them right before all this happened and it's not working. I started out 125mcg two days and nothing so I jumped up to 140mcg. I still get nothing last two days I went up to 200 and still no shakes no temp rise. Anyone els had similar problems or what?



hey MM I just finished up 30 days of their T3 and I got minimal results as well, no more than i might lose without it.. I got the clen late, so i am going to start it within the next few days, i'll let you know what i find.
 
I got T3 and Clen from them on the day they were busted. Havn't tried it yet. It'd suck to not only have been scammed, but also worried about a "friendly visit".
 
guys....the ancillaries purchased are non scheduled or controlled substances...u need a perscription to purchase....so they would be regulated by the FDA....the FDA rarely if ever would bust a guy buying cialis because he can't get a hard on to fuck his wife.....the DA would never agree to prosecute a guy that bought a few ancillaries....now LR distributing them is a different story....I would expect the FDA to get involved to see if they can punch holes in the research argument....

the whole scedule thing is about abuse.....


Read the below....a family memeber is a pharmacist and sent me the below for a clearification of a controlled vs non controlled substance.

Classification of Controlled Substances

The first step in controlling drugs of abuse is to define which drugs are considered to be subject to abuse. The CSA does this by enumerating five Schedules of drugs and describing the criteria for placing drugs into one of the five Schedules. These criteria were listed in the Chapter I. It is important to note that there is a difference between a Scheduled drug and a legend drug. This fundamental distinction is sometimes overlooked by pharmacists. A legend drug is one that may be distributed only pursuant to a prescription. The opposite of legend drug is non-prescription drug. A Scheduled drug is one that is regulated under the CSA due to its potential for abuse. The opposite of Scheduled drug is non-Scheduled drug. Thus, there are four possible combinations. A drug may be a Scheduled, legend drug. This would mean that it is has an abuse potential and requires a prescription. Morphine and benzodiazepines are examples of Scheduled, legend drugs. Alternatively, a drug may be a non-Scheduled, legend drug. This would mean that it does not have an abuse potential but it requires a prescription. Oral antibiotics and antihypertensives are examples of non-Scheduled, legend drugs. A third possibility is that a drug could be a non-Scheduled, non-legend drug. This would mean that the drug does not have an abuse potential and requires no prescription. Aspirin and ranitidine are examples of nonScheduled, non-legend drugs. The fourth possibility is the most rarely occurring and it sometimes takes some convincing before people believe there are really drugs of this kind; a drug that has abuse potential and requires no prescription. Products that contain low strengths of opium to treat diarrhea and products that contain low strengths of codeine to treat cough are examples of such drugs. These products are limited to dispensing by a pharmacist under the CSA and they do not require a prescription under the FDCA, thus they occupy a very unusual category regulated drugs.

With five different Schedules, one might think that there would be five different sets of rules to learn. But the reality for pharmacists is that three sets of rules will actually suffice. Since Schedule I controlled substances have no currently recognized medical use, they are generally not found in pharmacies. Only when such drugs are being used under clinical protocols would they be of concern to pharmacists, and that classification restricts them to research institutions. Schedule II controlled substances are the most highly restricted of those drugs that are ordinarily found in pharmacies, so the rules applicable to them are numerous and somewhat burdensome. At the dispensing level, Schedule III and IV controlled substances are handled in essentially the same way, so no distinction need be drawn between them. The rules for Schedule V controlled substances are similar to those for Schedules III and IV, but there are differences that warrant considering them separately. So as a general rule, it is possible to learn three sets of rules, those applicable to Schedule II drugs, those applicable to Schedules III and IV, and those applicable to Schedule V. The other rules of the CSA depend on this drug classification scheme.
 
Actually on the your credit card statement it didnt say you made a purchase from Liquid Research, it said something else but I cant remember. I ordered about 8months ago. 1 bottle of clen for my buddy and it did nothing for him.

And thats the truth
 
Hey Micro, my cc statement from last month lists the purchase from "Liquid Research." I can't remember if previous purchases listed that name or not. I hope those vials I bought don't get me into trouble. ;)

Cronk
 
Back
Top