Lab max VS Roid test: which one is better?

[master.on]

Very interesting your thread. So in conclusion you recommend roid test ?

Marquis reagent is cheap (a $25 bottle lasts dozens of tests) and proven
in fact proven by none less than DEA

Google
"Preliminary Identification of Suspected Heroin
Samples by NarcoPouch Field Test Panel"
and you'll see the DEA tests results

 

[slick3]

I tested Test E , which turned out not to be it. I didn't have UV light to be completely sure it's fake, but colours in the vials already not matched. I previously used this test for same substance which was bought from different lab, and substance was confirmed correctly. I will retest with UV light and post results here with lab reveal.

 

[T&H]

I tested Test E , which turned out not to be it. I didn't have UV light to be completely sure it's fake, but colours in the vials already not matched. I previously used this test for same substance which was bought from different lab, and substance was confirmed correctly. I will retest with UV light and post results here with lab reveal.

Waste of time and money. Both are not reliable nor are accepted in place of HPLC testing. So don't bother because whatever source you name is irrelevant.

 

[slick3]

Waste of time and money. Both are not reliable nor are accepted in place of HPLC testing. So don't bother because whatever source you name is irrelevant.

Can you elaborate and explain why I was getting consistently correct results previously, until I switched lab ?Why it's not reliable ?

 

[Millard]

Can you elaborate and explain why I was getting consistently correct results previously, until I switched lab ?Why it's not reliable ?

Qualitative vs quantitative.

Colorimetric can be used as qualitative but there may be issues of false negatives/positives. But as a quantitative, not accurate at all.

Since @janoshik starting offering affordable quantitative testing , it's become the far preferred option to colorimetric testing.

 

[slick3]

Qualitative vs quantitative.

Colorimetric can be used as qualitative but there may be issues of false negatives/positives. But as a quantitative, not accurate at all.

Since @janoshik starting offering affordable quantitative testing , it's become the far preferred option to colorimetric testing.

I tested pharma grade stuff when I first bought this test kit, and it was correct, and then started testing Test E, which was also correct until I switched labs. I have some pharma grade stuff with me and out of curiousity I will test it again. If it will be correct, you can not say it's false positive. At the moment all I can see that you trying to push Janoshik who was proved to be selective scammer. That's what I found from quick search in google. And I have impression some of you have ties with janoshik and he tries to ''legitimize'' some of the sellers, who are selling fake gear. Around 30-40% of gear on the market is fake or subpar quality, what stops janoshik from taking some extra cash to provide fake certificate, considering his track records are not in his favor.

 

[T&H]

I tested pharma grade stuff when I first bought this test kit, and it was correct, and then started testing Test E, which was also correct until I switched labs. I have some pharma grade stuff with me and out of curiousity I will test it again. If it will be correct, you can not say it's false positive. At the moment all I can see that you trying to push Janoshik who was proved to be selective scammer. That's what I found from quick search in google. And I have impression some of you have ties with janoshik and he tries to ''legitimize'' some of the sellers, who are selling fake gear. Around 30-40% of gear on the market is fake or subpar quality, what stops janoshik from taking some extra cash to provide fake certificate, considering his track records are not in his favor.

And now we see your true colors come out. Ever heard of blind samples being identified correctly...yet Jano is taking cash under the table. Wow.

Good luck around the forum. The reputation you are showing will follow you around. You'll find that out first hand.

 

[janoshik]

Qualitative vs quantitative.

Colorimetric can be used as qualitative but there may be issues of false negatives/positives. But as a quantitative, not accurate at all.

Since @janoshik starting offering affordable quantitative testing , it's become the far preferred option to colorimetric testing.

We also experiment with qualitative only tests, as there seems to be 'some' demand.

 

[tuffie]

Qualtitative in chemistry = Identifying compound

Wealso experiment with qualitative only tests, as there seems to be 'some' demand.

View attachment 254989

Qualitative in chemistry = Identifying compound

 

[tuffie]

Qualitative vs quantitative.

Colorimetric can be used as qualitative but there may be issues of false negatives/positives. But as a quantitative, not accurate at all.

Since @janoshik starting offering affordable quantitative testing , it's become the far preferred option to colorimetric testing.

Use porcelain plate. use 3 samples (of the same sample). lay 3 samples on plate. drop marquiz on each sample. *sizzles sample* . Lift up porcelain plate. Let run. Identify. Its simple.

[***^^Qualitative described above^^***]

Send to Jano for quantitaive anaylisys. ez.

03 ***data days

just keep using diff email / btc address

 

[janoshik]

just keep using diff email / btc address

Don't underestimate my crystal ball!

 

[Rido]

Don't underestimate my crystal ball!

Magic 8 ball with a bunch of different AAS compounds on it.

 

[Millard]

At the moment all I can see that you trying to push Janoshik who was proved to be selective scammer. That's what I found from quick search in google. And I have impression some of you have ties with janoshik and he tries to ''legitimize'' some of the sellers, who are selling fake gear.

Wow. That's your take-away from my statement "Since @janoshik starting offering affordable quantitative testing , it's become the far preferred option to colorimetric testing"?

The takeaway should have been quantitative testing data is vastly and indisputably superior to qualitative testing (cp).

If you distrust Janoshik and/or other companies that can provide quantitative data, then by all means stick to the colorimetric tests.