Labmax - pharmacom - test e

If you can, get hold of Frank and tell him you want to send a vial of whatever you think is bunk or under dosed to the lab for testing, he says he will cover the cost and i assume replacements as well. Of course if they are bunk why would you want that?
 
If you can, get hold of Frank and tell him you want to send a vial of whatever you think is bunk or under dosed to the lab for testing, he says he will cover the cost and i assume replacements as well. Of course if they are bunk why would you want that?

Last I checked frank wanted the customer to pay all the costs upfront and then he would reimburse. No thanks.
 
Wish i knew you, i would pay for it just to finally get to the bottom of it.
If it is bunk we can show Frank the results..BAM !! Explain this, and if it passes then we know labmax is flawed.
 
Glad to hear your going to go as planned with this gear. I ran his sus and had good results BW came back at 4024 at 600mg per week. Currently running the mix2 and having some really decent results, anyway i hope it turns out to be good gear regardless of LM.
 
Wish i knew you, i would pay for it just to finally get to the bottom of it.
If it is bunk we can show Frank the results..BAM !! Explain this, and if it passes then we know labmax is flawed.
Do you know the cost to have it tested and where to send?
 
Your conclusion is incorrect. As it explicitly states on labmaxes website, these tests in no way, shape, or form tell you anything about concentration or potency and that's being generous if you believe in anything about labmax to begin with.
Fair enough. Seeing as there was only the faintest of fluorescence, how would you characterize the result?
 
Fair enough. Seeing as there was only the faintest of fluorescence, how would you characterize the result?

I don't characterize it Lightspan. I give no value to labmax personally. The only things I would consider are blood tests for things like testosterone and AIs/SERMs and mass spec for other compounds but that's my decision and not necessarily anyone else's.
 
Wish i knew you, i would pay for it just to finally get to the bottom of it.
If it is bunk we can show Frank the results..BAM !! Explain this, and if it passes then we know labmax is flawed.
I'd get in on that with you if there's a way and willingness to go forward keeping everyone's identity safe.
 
Fair enough. Seeing as there was only the faintest of fluorescence, how would you characterize the result?

the more you dissolve something the less you see it,

it makes sense if you dissolve less and less of the steroid in oil the fluorescence will faint out slowly.

but the point it that the test was not designed for potency.

see my last test of tren enan,

one powder gave good fluorescence but once it brewed it there was almost none

the other powder gave good fluorescence in oil, so it had higher concentration and I had it lab tested to confirm it.

but the point it is more like guessing
 
Back
Top